Jump to content
IGNORED

Tremelo min

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

Guest ccfeln

Tremelo Min:

 

Yup. Goes to prove that sometimes you just strike something simple and great, because that first synth melody on its own

is already good, what a start (0:14). Then that other synth melody (1:17) also does it, great, and you just dont need to complicate (not playing off the work here, on the contrary)

 

Well done, thumbs up.

 

(Only criticism, the end, i think a simple fade with all elements in place is better than what you did, try it!)

(1:59, synth _perhaps_ too loud)

Edited by ccfeln
Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/23097-tremelo-min/#findComment-481648
Share on other sites

Guest yan_g
tremelo min: thought it started pretty terrible, but you never know what to expect next to such a simple beat. the synths do it pretty good, the panning is nice. i think that the second melody (1:17) could've been acompanied by changes in the sounds, some drums backing up those already in place, or some other synths, added or replacing. the next synth at about 1:55 is pretty nice, like the vibe. i would've just enjoyed more variation in the beat. there is one note that sounds out of key (maybe because of the delay, dunno). imo this track deserves some more development. i hear a little unexploited potential.
Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/23097-tremelo-min/#findComment-482050
Share on other sites

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 Member

×
×