"The Modern Bass Guitar" is the music you play when you get the HIGHEST SCORE OF ALL TIME

please can i touch your orville?

frankly, i've already got the highest score of all time.

the highest score is what comes right before it all rolls over to 000's

he knows^

  Dr. Elemeno von Hat X: PhD said:

the highest score is what comes right before it all rolls over to 000's

true dat.

that's when you crack open the dashboard.

Or, if this is software orientated: some peices of code tend to make your score into minus numbers for some reason.

yeah, i thought of that!

computers in general use "two's compliment" for internal binary math, meaning all 1's (1111...) is a negative number, -1. the most nevative number in your average 32 bit computer is -2,147,483,648 (a zero followed by 31 ones).

the flip side, 32 bit int max, 2,147,483,647, would be a 1 followed by all zeroes!! not the binary high score at all...

0 followed by 31 ones == -2,147,483,647

1 followed by 31 zeroes == 2,147,483,647

32 ones (max straight-up binary) == -1

is this why tom prefers analogue?

analogue might be better here because when you get the highest score of all time

in the digital world.... things just tend to crash...no rewards!

(egads elemeno man you earned the phd with the binary)

  Dr. Elemeno von Hat X: PhD said:

yeah, i thought of that!

 

computers in general use "two's compliment" for internal binary math, meaning all 1's (1111...) is a negative number, -1. the most nevative number in your average 32 bit computer is -2,147,483,648 (a zero followed by 31 ones).

 

the flip side, 32 bit int max, 2,147,483,647, would be a 1 followed by all zeroes!! not the binary high score at all...

 

0 followed by 31 ones == -2,147,483,647

1 followed by 31 zeroes == 2,147,483,647

32 ones (max straight-up binary) == -1

 

is this why tom prefers analogue?

Thanks for explaining that old chap.

  ANTIDEMETA said:

(egads elemeno man you earned the phd with the binary)

 

  Dr. Elemeno von Hat X: PhD said:

yeah, i thought of that!

 

computers in general use "two's compliment" for internal binary math, meaning all 1's (1111...) is a negative number, -1. the most nevative number in your average 32 bit computer is -2,147,483,648 (a zero followed by 31 ones).

 

the flip side, 32 bit int max, 2,147,483,647, would be a 1 followed by all zeroes!! not the binary high score at all...

 

0 followed by 31 ones == -2,147,483,647

1 followed by 31 zeroes == 2,147,483,647

32 ones (max straight-up binary) == -1

 

is this why tom prefers analogue?

i refer you to this painfully nerdy pun:

http://forum.watmm.com/index.php?showtopic=14903

  Josso said:

Thanks for explaining that old chap.

i think i may have to devote the rest of my life to the pursuit of reverb...

  Dr. Elemeno von Hat X: PhD said:

  ANTIDEMETA said:

(egads elemeno man you earned the phd with the binary)

 

  Dr. Elemeno von Hat X: PhD said:

yeah, i thought of that!

 

computers in general use "two's compliment" for internal binary math, meaning all 1's (1111...) is a negative number, -1. the most nevative number in your average 32 bit computer is -2,147,483,648 (a zero followed by 31 ones).

 

the flip side, 32 bit int max, 2,147,483,647, would be a 1 followed by all zeroes!! not the binary high score at all...

 

0 followed by 31 ones == -2,147,483,647

1 followed by 31 zeroes == 2,147,483,647

32 ones (max straight-up binary) == -1

 

is this why tom prefers analogue?

 

i refer you to this painfully nerdy pun:

 

http://forum.watmm.com/index.php?showtopic=14903

 

  Josso said:

Thanks for explaining that old chap.