Guest Adjective Posted November 26, 2007 Report Share Posted November 26, 2007 they took a sweep, tone, other stuff at 96khz and then resampled in various wave editors to 44.1khz and you can browse the spectrograms of each result. http://src.infinitewave.ca Quote Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/28550-comparison-of-sample-rate-converters/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubba69 Posted November 27, 2007 Report Share Posted November 27, 2007 many some of those have crazy noise and aliasing. Like the waveburner one, and the anytime 1.0 one. Whats up with that? and sadie... iZotope ones are really nice. Thanks Haha Confused Sad Facepalm Burger Farnsworth Big Brain Like × Quote Hide Bubba69's signature Hide all signatures https://intervallux.bandcamp.com/ Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/28550-comparison-of-sample-rate-converters/#findComment-603978 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Adjective Posted November 27, 2007 Report Share Posted November 27, 2007 the weird harmonics that pop up make really cool designs poor goldwave. a little surprised that wavelab 5 would look so ugly i was trying to see what editors actually use the iZotope SRC, all i could see was iZotope RX but only the advanced version that's still in trial or something. and then there was some suite that i was unfamiliar with that had licensed it. adobe audition seemed to fair well so i think i'll stick with that, they've also licensed some stuff from iZotope like multiband / singleband dynamics p.s. way to go Voxengo! their free r8brain seemed to ball outta control Quote Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/28550-comparison-of-sample-rate-converters/#findComment-604089 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts