The Last Airbender

lol

at the end of the movie you find out

never seen the cartoon

but that looks pretty dope

shyamalongadingdong was born to fail

i get it...he blows angry plant pollen at his enemies, right?

why must he has his stupid name above all his movie titles. he is so full of himself.

I can imagine whe he signed on they were like "we are going to make this awesome amine series called Avatar into Avatar: The Movie! Oh wait, nevermind."

I quite enjoyed the show and hope that it translates well into live action movie. At the very least this will look good.

God damnit! M. Night Shyamalan has again tricked me into going to see another one of his movies.

How does this guy still get money to make these retarded movies

what a twist!

Wait. I don't understand. How can Shamylandalongalan make this movie when James Cameron is making it? Did he just do the teaser trailer?

i just floated an airbender.

looks good!

so it's another "lots a things" *mouth explosion* movie

i'd like to see him do other nickelodeon shows in this style. M. Night Shamalyan's DOUG.

a friend of mine met shyamalan in a book store in new york and he was a jerk. signs was fail. this is all the opinion i got

p.s. adjective your avatar rocks

is this that kid that fred mcgriff farted on in the grocery store and the radioactive fart gave him super fart summoning powers and now he's gonna get his revenge on fred?

I tried bending the air and broke it.

  Barricade said:

thats exactly what I was thinking. I sure somebody has already dubbed this with the voice of the trailer.

the avatar movie by james cameron is about blue aliens which don't have souls and humans kind of mind control them to make them do stuff. basically the same thing as surrogates.

finally, an x-men prequel!

somebody please explain to filmmakers that putting LOTS OF STUFF on screen was impressive in the olden days because some poor fucker had to actually build LOTS OF STUFF.

nowadays it means jack shit. everyone knows its fake. nobody gives a fuck about how many times your animators can copy/paste a boat/tank/robot/orc/whatever

This picture gave me a few days worth of lawls.

  analogue wings said:

somebody please explain to filmmakers that putting LOTS OF STUFF on screen was impressive in the olden days because some poor fucker had to actually build LOTS OF STUFF.

 

nowadays it means jack shit. everyone knows its fake. nobody gives a fuck about how many times your animators can copy/paste a boat/tank/robot/orc/whatever

i think the problem goes deeper, somehow the more real vfx get, the more they alienate us from ourselves (not sure if this is covered by uncanny valley or not). It's like breast implants - you want them visually but end up being disgusted by them; they turn your own desires against you, much as advertising does. Similarly you want vfx to be believable because you need the endorphin/adrenaline rush, yet the fakeness nags at you and makes you vaguely disgusted with things.

I don't think people really stopped to think how long it took them to make models in the early days of VFX, but the novelty has certainly worn off and the threshold needed to achieve eyegasm keeps rising. I really don't know what we humans are going to be doing to stimulate ourselves 50 yrs from now...