VOTE

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=Fh9dUWsVyW4K7tAOwvq0sQ_3d_3d

thanks

I picked number 2.

5

What it's supposed to be used for?

i picked one...

it was number 3.

I picked 4 and wrote my reasons in the comment field.

4

4 is by far the best, due to it being easy to reproduce in 1 colour or full colour formats, no gradients (again for ease of reproduction), and no gimmicks like #5 has.

Would make a good sticker; I'd get one to put on a laptop or other surface.

I choosed no.1 even it has parts like the Habitat Skateboards firm logo does.

final year assignment to make water-tight business plan. me and a mate are doing web/graphic design/development company which we could conceivably start when we graduate.

  On 11/11/2009 at 5:17 PM, Joyrex said:

4 is by far the best, due to it being easy to reproduce in 1 colour or full colour formats, no gradients (again for ease of reproduction), and no gimmicks like #5 has.

 

Would make a good sticker; I'd get one to put on a laptop or other surface.

these are really good points, thanks.

Yeah Joyrex knows his shit.

I'd like it if 4 was redone in the perspective of 5

Can you post them here? After I voted it doesn't let you look at them again.

  On 11/11/2009 at 5:24 PM, assegai said:

Can you post them here? After I voted it doesn't let you look at them again.

Yeah that is a bit of a shitter, would be nice to see them again from joyrex's perspective.

personally i'm now thinking we shouldn't go with #4 or #5 (despite it coming out top). stylistically something like that could date quite quickly and isn't very adaptable. by contrast, #1 can be changed or adapted whilst keeping the core design (ie. those basic swirly lines). we could tailor it to the aesthetics of each specific project we do too...

I actually voted for 3 but i think it's just because of the colors, 1 with 3's colors sans gradient would be nice.

I still very much like 2.

Thanks IDRN.

I voted for number 1. Don't know shit about design but I think it's quite pleasing as an image as well as a text logo.

  On 11/11/2009 at 5:35 PM, idrn said:

 

personally i'm now thinking we shouldn't go with #4 or #5 (despite it coming out top). stylistically something like that could date quite quickly and isn't very adaptable. by contrast, #1 can be changed or adapted whilst keeping the core design (ie. those basic swirly lines). we could tailor it to the aesthetics of each specific project we do too...

Speaking professionally, I think #4 has more positive aspects in terms of good logo design - #1 is nice, but is unreadable, which, depending on it's application, might make it ineffective in conveying it's message or brand recognition.

#2 is definitely the most aesthetically pleasing.

i would possibly have gone with 3, as geometrically, its probably slighty more balanced than 2 but i didn't like the gradients, partly because of the complications they bring with printing etc.

actuallt i'd go with a hybrid of 2 and 3, but all in flat blue....

something like this

the first 3 remind me of the old Arctic Monkeys logo. as a consequence, i detest them. 4 or 5 it is

4 looks clumsy. the 3D aspect and the leaning typeface looks shoddy.

5 (without the shadow) is definitely tidier looking than 4.

where is the obama option. racist bullshit.

CATASTROPIC WARNING -

Obama must resign to save his people from his catastrophe.

SUN power will not allow any

Black Skin power to rule over its Light Domain.

Hell cometh to the dumb, ignorant, educated

stupid "Worshippers of ONE", for Creation

is of OPPOSITES. Born Cubed I defy God of

ONE, for I have a Yes and No mentality

necessary for cubed intelligence -no Cyclopic

educator can allow. Obama must resign or

Doomsday,for only Light can rule over Earth.

No ONEistic god possesses Cubed Wisdom.

1 - 3 are neat looking but I don't think they immediately project meaning like 4 -5

4 is more quirky than 5, having the tilt, and so i think it's less likely to be accidentally copied by someone else

for clarity, then 4

for beauty and mystery, i would choose 1

i liked the first 3 better but I couldnt read them