dude turns dolphin calls into idm pictures

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/picture-galleries/6644756/Whale-song-art-dolphin-calls-turned-into-kaleidoscopic-patterns-using-wavelets.html

pretty cool. reminds me of this....

"The first in a ongoing series begun in 1997, this photograph is the result of digitally averaging every Playboy centerfold foldout for the 10 years beginning Jan. 1988 through Dec. 1997. The shroud-like image is yielded by a simple, custom process: point-by-point mathematical averaging. No special "morphing" is used."

  On 3/30/2010 at 10:00 PM, jules said:

pretty cool. reminds me of this....

 

"The first in a ongoing series begun in 1997, this photograph is the result of digitally averaging every Playboy centerfold foldout for the 10 years beginning Jan. 1988 through Dec. 1997. The shroud-like image is yielded by a simple, custom process: point-by-point mathematical averaging. No special "morphing" is used."

 

 

very cool. i still get a completely sexual vibe from it. they should make an issue of 'ambient pornography'.

it reminds me of that shroud of torin thing that was supposed to be jesus

cool find, reminds me of this ted talk.

Evan Grant: Making sound visible through cymatics

  On 3/30/2010 at 10:00 PM, jules said:

pretty cool. reminds me of this....

 

"The first in a ongoing series begun in 1997, this photograph is the result of digitally averaging every Playboy centerfold foldout for the 10 years beginning Jan. 1988 through Dec. 1997. The shroud-like image is yielded by a simple, custom process: point-by-point mathematical averaging. No special "morphing" is used."

 

 

i dont get how that is cool, it's an orangey pink mist created by thousands of images of fake-titted, dumb-brained women.

  On 3/30/2010 at 10:00 PM, jules said:

pretty cool. reminds me of this....

 

"The first in a ongoing series begun in 1997, this photograph is the result of digitally averaging every Playboy centerfold foldout for the 10 years beginning Jan. 1988 through Dec. 1997. The shroud-like image is yielded by a simple, custom process: point-by-point mathematical averaging. No special "morphing" is used."

 

What does that mean exactly. they just overlapped each picture over another?

Living in the 21st Century is awesome.

  On 3/30/2010 at 11:23 PM, ZiggomaticV17 said:

  On 3/30/2010 at 10:00 PM, jules said:

pretty cool. reminds me of this....

 

"The first in a ongoing series begun in 1997, this photograph is the result of digitally averaging every Playboy centerfold foldout for the 10 years beginning Jan. 1988 through Dec. 1997. The shroud-like image is yielded by a simple, custom process: point-by-point mathematical averaging. No special "morphing" is used."

 

 

What does that mean exactly. they just overlapped each picture over another?

each pixel has a byte-sized (0-255) number for red, green and blue.

so for example the pixel in the upperleft corner of Miss Jan. 1988 reads:

123 087 076

and the same pixel for Miss Feb. 1988 reads:

082 233 123

and March:

092 123 134

you add them together and devide by the number of layers to get the average, and repeat that with every pixel.

(123+082+092)/3 (087+233+123)/3 (076+123+134)/3

pixels are fun innit

<- this avatar is that image:

put through an mp3 compressor.

overdrive:

vocoder treatment:

etc...

As if Bobby Kotick wasn't scary enough

  On 3/30/2010 at 11:39 PM, phling said:

  On 3/30/2010 at 11:23 PM, ZiggomaticV17 said:

  On 3/30/2010 at 10:00 PM, jules said:

pretty cool. reminds me of this....

 

"The first in a ongoing series begun in 1997, this photograph is the result of digitally averaging every Playboy centerfold foldout for the 10 years beginning Jan. 1988 through Dec. 1997. The shroud-like image is yielded by a simple, custom process: point-by-point mathematical averaging. No special "morphing" is used."

 

 

What does that mean exactly. they just overlapped each picture over another?

 

each pixel has a byte-sized (0-255) number for red, green and blue.

 

so for example the pixel in the upperleft corner of Miss Jan. 1988 reads:

 

123 087 076

 

and the same pixel for Miss Feb. 1988 reads:

 

082 233 123

 

and March:

 

092 123 134

 

you add them together and devide by the number of layers to get the average, and repeat that with every pixel.

 

(123+082+092)/3 (087+233+123)/3 (076+123+134)/3

 

nice, now i like it more

the dolphin one is a bit crap and has obviously had a huge amount of human input.

hippy cunts.

  On 3/30/2010 at 10:13 PM, uptowndevil said:

'ambient pornography'.

Most IDM thing of 2011!

  On 3/30/2010 at 11:39 PM, phling said:

  On 3/30/2010 at 11:23 PM, ZiggomaticV17 said:

  On 3/30/2010 at 10:00 PM, jules said:

pretty cool. reminds me of this....

 

"The first in a ongoing series begun in 1997, this photograph is the result of digitally averaging every Playboy centerfold foldout for the 10 years beginning Jan. 1988 through Dec. 1997. The shroud-like image is yielded by a simple, custom process: point-by-point mathematical averaging. No special "morphing" is used."

 

 

What does that mean exactly. they just overlapped each picture over another?

 

each pixel has a byte-sized (0-255) number for red, green and blue.

 

so for example the pixel in the upperleft corner of Miss Jan. 1988 reads:

 

123 087 076

 

and the same pixel for Miss Feb. 1988 reads:

 

082 233 123

 

and March:

 

092 123 134

 

you add them together and devide by the number of layers to get the average, and repeat that with every pixel.

 

(123+082+092)/3 (087+233+123)/3 (076+123+134)/3

 

It would be kool if they fused all the chicks into one image to make one super hot porn star. Like the way the made Gordon Freeman's Face from Half Life a fusion of 5 guys.