Jump to content
IGNORED

prop 8 overturned


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah. It doesn't compute in my brain why people would give a shit who marries who.

How does it make any difference to someone if 2 gay people they don't know personally marry each other?

 

I'm happy for teh gays.

:beer:

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/58515-prop-8-overturned/#findComment-1387485
Share on other sites

  On 8/5/2010 at 4:50 AM, jefferoo said:

Yeah. It doesn't compute in my brain why people would give a shit who marries who.

How does it make any difference to someone if 2 gay people they don't know personally marry each other?

 

I'm happy for teh gays.

:beer:

This.

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/58515-prop-8-overturned/#findComment-1387522
Share on other sites

i've never understood the logic behind the argument against this. It seems like gay marriage should lessen the association of homosexuals with promiscuity, a stereotype many people seem to have.

guidedbyvoicesbeethousa.png

  On 6/9/2010 at 4:26 PM, Blanket Fort Collapse said:

Daniel Johnston > Lady Gaga

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/58515-prop-8-overturned/#findComment-1387537
Share on other sites

Don't you guys remember? Allowing gays to marry will lead to an alarming rise in the number of people having sex with horses.

백호야~~~항상에 사랑할거예요.나의 아들.

 

Shout outs to the saracens, musulmen and celestials.

 

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/58515-prop-8-overturned/#findComment-1387546
Share on other sites

Guest glasse

A reminder that it is not a democracy but a republic.

 

My personal view is that civil unions should be made for everyone, gay or straight as far as the government is concerned, and then it is up to individual churches whether or not to bless that union as a marriage. This way conservative/religious views on the sanctity of marriage are not threatened, but gay people still get the same civil rights as anyone else. Liberal churches would be able to marry homosexuals but conservative churches could still choose not to. The secular government would only be concerned with civil unions and would have no more say over who is or isn't married than they do over who is or isn't baptized.

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/58515-prop-8-overturned/#findComment-1387561
Share on other sites

my take:

 

maybe i'm wrong, but christianity / western philosophies and morals play a large role in American politics. so it seems.

 

 

 

this sort of western moral system makes people feel some sort of deep unconscious fear of being gay. that's just my theory - it's some sort of repression or defense mechanism. these people are maybe just the tiniest bit gay and they strongly reject it because they project their hate onto others. some kind of inadequacy.

 

i don't think i explained that well at all, but the idea is in there somewhere.

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/58515-prop-8-overturned/#findComment-1387565
Share on other sites

  On 8/5/2010 at 6:32 AM, tipper said:

i've never understood the logic behind the argument against this. It seems like gay marriage should lessen the association of homosexuals with promiscuity, a stereotype many people seem to have.

 

Maybe the right wants to hold onto that association?

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/58515-prop-8-overturned/#findComment-1387683
Share on other sites

Guest MaxChewie
  On 8/5/2010 at 3:18 PM, Squee said:
  On 8/5/2010 at 4:33 AM, Franklin said:

strange that this is even still an issue in the western world.

 

^This^

 

 

On a sidenote, I was watching America's Next Top Model the other day and during a photo shoot Jay Manuel's nipple came into the shot but it was blurred out! Wtf? I'm not implying that it was blurred out because of the fact that he's too gay to function, but why the hell would you want to blur out a man nipple? USA USA USA!

 

arrested-development-tobias.gif

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/58515-prop-8-overturned/#findComment-1387696
Share on other sites

  On 8/5/2010 at 3:07 PM, jefferoo said:
  On 8/5/2010 at 6:32 AM, tipper said:

i've never understood the logic behind the argument against this. It seems like gay marriage should lessen the association of homosexuals with promiscuity, a stereotype many people seem to have.

 

Maybe the right wants to hold onto that association?

obviously but then disallowing civil unions seems counter-intuitive on their part.

guidedbyvoicesbeethousa.png

  On 6/9/2010 at 4:26 PM, Blanket Fort Collapse said:

Daniel Johnston > Lady Gaga

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/58515-prop-8-overturned/#findComment-1387940
Share on other sites

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 Member

×
×