Jump to content
IGNORED

the internet must not be ‘stifled by government control or censorship’


Recommended Posts

Yeah not regulation of the internet exactly, but definite regulation of the corporations that run the internet. net-neutrality is good.

백호야~~~항상에 사랑할거예요.나의 아들.

 

Shout outs to the saracens, musulmen and celestials.

 

    Quote
Hague rejected the idea of any government policing of the web, saying: “Nothing would be more fatal or self-defeating than the heavy hand of State control on the internet’.

 

    Quote
Hague said that an international agreement about behaviour in cyberspace should be pursued ‘with the same intensity as efforts to eradicate global poverty or tackle climate change’.

 

Am I missing something, or aren't these contradictory statements?

Guest viscosity
  On 11/2/2011 at 1:02 PM, Bob Dobalina said:
    Quote
Hague rejected the idea of any government policing of the web, saying: “Nothing would be more fatal or self-defeating than the heavy hand of State control on the internet’.

 

    Quote
Hague said that an international agreement about behaviour in cyberspace should be pursued ‘with the same intensity as efforts to eradicate global poverty or tackle climate change’.

 

Am I missing something, or aren't these contradictory statements?

 

i took the latter as sarcasm

  On 11/2/2011 at 2:26 PM, verticalhold said:

The Internet must not be stifled by algorithms

 

Yeah, algorithms are evil.

Yo, my name is Saad and I don't give a fuck.

  On 11/2/2011 at 1:25 AM, The Pod said:

That fucking mick is probably drunk.

Its a paddy.

 

Jesus, fucking fat american, cant even do racism right. :emotawesomepm9:

 

  On 11/2/2011 at 1:02 PM, Bob Dobalina said:
    Quote
Hague rejected the idea of any government policing of the web, saying: “Nothing would be more fatal or self-defeating than the heavy hand of State control on the internet’.

 

    Quote
Hague said that an international agreement about behaviour in cyberspace should be pursued ‘with the same intensity as efforts to eradicate global poverty or tackle climate change’.

 

Am I missing something, or aren't these contradictory statements?

 

Could be, its not clear. For me "regulation" and "agreement" dont mean the same thing. But in politics they probably do.

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 Member

×
×