Jump to content
IGNORED

Erotic photos girl count estimate


Recommended Posts

So I browse the tumblrs and I started thinking that I have, in my whole life seen so many different girls on photos it's ridiculous.

 

Let's make this simple: I want to know, how many girls/women had their photos taken, but only such photos count that they have had to have the intention of making it look at least a bit erotic if not pornographic.

 

Even greater would be a value in %. Let's say only women between 18 and 30 in Europe and USA count. I'm telling you I've seen so many and I know you've seen even more.

 

Are they 1% ?

 

...so many...

 

Oh, and don't post such stuff in here that will destroy and make bosses delete this thread, I want to make something special here!

www.petergaber.com is where I keep my paintings. I used to have a kinky tumblr, but it exploded.

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/71024-erotic-photos-girl-count-estimate/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I have been wondering this same thing for the past year. We live in such a bizarre world.

 

I don't know how anyone can answer your question, but I'd like to know a percentage as well.

  On 1/10/2012 at 6:56 PM, marf said:

what's the question?

 

I would like to participate in this discussion, but yeah.

Well a lot of girls take photos that are supposed to be for one particular person, unfortunately (well...not so much for you guys) we know how that pans out.

  On 1/10/2012 at 8:35 PM, rixxx said:

Well a lot of girls take photos that are supposed to be for one particular person, unfortunately (well...not so much for you guys) we know how that pans out.

Yea, are these kind of photos factored in? I'd vote no, but how do we differentiate/know?

Edit: I'm more interested in how many women willingly put themselves online or out in the media in borderline pornographic/pornographic poses.

 

The question is what percentage of women/girls have sexy pictures of themselves on the internet or published in some form of media? We haven't drawn the "cute/attractive/erotic/gaarg" line yet, so that's still up for debate.

 

I vote that the picture is supposed to be sexy, not just cute. Has to be scantily clad, pornographic, or something like that. And I have no idea what percentage that'd be.

 

I've never been in the loop in regards to sexy girl photos. I just look up a porn, wank, and call it a day/week.

Edited by Murveman

Hey, wait, are we voting already? I guess it's about .0001 percent, in los angeles it's probably 65 percent though. I vote maybe.

Some songs I made with my fingers and electronics. In the process of making some more. Hopefully.

 

  Reveal hidden contents
  On 1/10/2012 at 9:03 PM, Awepittance said:

i think what you're finding is that life itself is erotic

No. I'm going to blame this one on human society, or at least our (the people's nations in this forum) collective society.

  On 1/10/2012 at 9:03 PM, Awepittance said:

i think what you're finding is that life itself is erotic

 

No tears, please. It's a waste of good suffering.

here are some numbers.

 

europe female population aged 20-24: 18.8 million

europe female population aged 25-29: 19.8 million

usa female population aged 20-24: 11.0 million

usa female population aged 25-29: 10.8 million

 

60.4 million total

 

if you looked at 100 different pictures of women everyday for 10 years, that's 365,000 pictures.

 

0.365/60.4 = 0.6%

 

so you'd have seen roughly 0.6% of the total population of eligible females.

 

there's no way to calculate the total percentage who actually took these kind of pictures, though.

  On 1/10/2012 at 10:10 PM, chaosmachine said:

here are some numbers.

 

europe female population aged 20-24: 18.8 million

europe female population aged 25-29: 19.8 million

usa female population aged 20-24: 11.0 million

usa female population aged 25-29: 10.8 million

 

60.4 million total

 

if you looked at 100 different pictures of women everyday for 10 years, that's 365,000 pictures.

 

0.365/60.4 = 0.6%

 

so you'd have seen roughly 0.6% of the total population of eligible females.

 

there's no way to calculate the total percentage who actually took these kind of pictures, though.

 

 

/thread

So that old cliche, "there's plenty of fish in the sea" is so, so true. Like astronomical amounts of hot girls.

  On 1/10/2012 at 10:58 PM, rixxx said:
  On 1/10/2012 at 10:10 PM, chaosmachine said:

here are some numbers.

 

europe female population aged 20-24: 18.8 million

europe female population aged 25-29: 19.8 million

usa female population aged 20-24: 11.0 million

usa female population aged 25-29: 10.8 million

 

60.4 million total

 

if you looked at 100 different pictures of women everyday for 10 years, that's 365,000 pictures.

 

0.365/60.4 = 0.6%

 

so you'd have seen roughly 0.6% of the total population of eligible females.

 

there's no way to calculate the total percentage who actually took these kind of pictures, though.

 

 

/thread

 

you need to take into account the distribution (you can see the same girl several times). It's probably a distribution with a long tail, so i'd wager it's a lot less.

*caresses long tail*

  On 1/10/2012 at 10:10 PM, chaosmachine said:

here are some numbers.

 

europe female population aged 20-24: 18.8 million

europe female population aged 25-29: 19.8 million

usa female population aged 20-24: 11.0 million

usa female population aged 25-29: 10.8 million

 

60.4 million total

 

if you looked at 100 different pictures of women everyday for 10 years, that's 365,000 pictures.

 

0.365/60.4 = 0.6%

 

so you'd have seen roughly 0.6% of the total population of eligible females.

 

there's no way to calculate the total percentage who actually took these kind of pictures, though.

Christ, way to end the thread.

So uh, now what do we talk about?

There will be quite some fireworks once you can run facial recognition via google or facebook and it tells you who all those girls are

That is a good tangent.

Some songs I made with my fingers and electronics. In the process of making some more. Hopefully.

 

  Reveal hidden contents

Ok, I think, that every girl's photo, that shows boobs or more counts, as long as the girl/woman knew it was made AND that it made it to the internet. It could be intimate photos or photoshoots for magazines, I don't care as long as it was meant to have her look good for men (or ladies...houwa!)

 

I knew more of you would be interested in this and I think we could get a bigger number. At least I'm suspecting that the rise of blog and facebook gave girls green light to show their bodies as they deeply always wanted. And today, younger girls see, that their predecessors have done so and it's kind of a role model thing for them. So if this goes on, I'd say in a couple of years at least 20% of young girls (15-20) will have their exposed or half exposed bodies somewhere on the nets, available for everyone to see.

 

Today, I'd say the number is bigger than 0,6%

www.petergaber.com is where I keep my paintings. I used to have a kinky tumblr, but it exploded.

If you only count western women above the age of 18 and below 40, you'll probably get a higher number. I don't think the numbers for ie India, the middle east or china are very high.

Some songs I made with my fingers and electronics. In the process of making some more. Hopefully.

 

  Reveal hidden contents
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 Member

×
×