If Richard releasing Drukqs II

How would you react?

It was really a long time ago I had heard Drukqs for the first time. That album is really a master piece and back then I was floating into that special Drukqs-mode. Of course I would love a Drukqs 2 album with more of those awsome tracks but can go into that mode again? I don't now.. Im afraid it's like listen to old tracks coming in a new form.

"If Richard releasing Druqks II"

"no"

yeah no, but yeah but no but... yes.

nope.

uhuh.

Drukqs 2?

I don't even dare to specualt

If Richard releasing Drukqs II

I'd rather want something new and exciting, but Drukqs 2 would be nice too. Any new Aphex would be nice... ANYHTHING.

PLZ RELEASE SOMETHING ALREADY

I need more songs dedicated to dogs.

Something like, Richard D James presents: "Drukqs Part 2: Ode to 3 dogs and my Pet salamander Larry" By Aphex Twin.

Giititdone.

At this point I'd be happy If Richard releasing Anything.

i want a funky richard this time, Ambient Funk

i want "aphex twin" no more aliases.

I want him to come out of the closet and release that Enya collaboration as soon as possible.

  On 11/25/2012 at 11:44 AM, usagi said:

if (Richard releasing drukqs II) then (_._) = (_o_)

LOL

And this is the point where I realise I may have seen too many porn videos.

...

O_o

  On 11/25/2012 at 11:44 AM, usagi said:

void main(){
if (Richard releasing drukqs II) then (_._) = (_o_);
}

 

/tmp$ gcc test.c
test.c: In function ‘main’:
test.c:2:6: error: ‘Richard’ undeclared (first use in this function)
test.c:2:6: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
test.c:2:14: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘releasing’
test.c:2:41: error: ‘_’ undeclared (first use in this function)
test.c:2:49: error: ‘_o_’ undeclared (first use in this function)

if richard releases drukqs 2 then everyone will go "omg".

then theey will grumble that its not as good as they thought it would be.

then they go back 2 whatever the fuk u lot r doing now.

Ehm, no you guys are definitely using the wrong compilers.

lol

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

  On 11/25/2012 at 11:57 AM, usagi said:

  On 11/25/2012 at 11:51 AM, psn said:

  On 11/25/2012 at 11:44 AM, usagi said:

void main(){
if (Richard releasing drukqs II) then (_._) = (_o_);
}

 

 

 

/tmp$ gcc test.c
test.c: In function ‘main’:
test.c:2:6: error: ‘Richard’ undeclared (first use in this function)
test.c:2:6: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
test.c:2:14: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘releasing’
test.c:2:41: error: ‘_’ undeclared (first use in this function)
test.c:2:49: error: ‘_o_’ undeclared (first use in this function)

 

Richard needs no declaration

you forgot

#include <aphex.h>

if rifford reasing ruqks roo

give it a listen, depending on how I felt would listen more, then id probably write something about it on this forum here

I'd shit my pants then post them to him for not releasing anything for so many years and then releasing a sequel.

I would groan as it would be a waste of time and I am sure he has better material than DrukQs by now.

  On 11/26/2012 at 9:48 PM, Joyrex said:

quite good 2: the sequel - 2 good 4 you

better than ziggomatic? oh SHIIIIIIIIIIII!

I honestly never saw thae whole "drukqs is the best rdj album evar!" thing.

It's a really good album, but it's by no means his best, imo.

I love how there is one afx song with piano in it that pops up and all the drukqs fanboys go crazy.