Mad Dentist Attempting To Clone John Lennon Using DNA From His Rotten Molar

A Canadian dentist is hoping to clone John Lennon using DNA from one of the singer's rotten teeth. Michael Zuk, who bought Lennon's molar at a 2011 auction, has begun sequencing the former Beatle's DNA – the first step in a process set out by scientists who propose to clone a woolly mammoth.

"Many Beatles fans remember where they were when they heard John Lennon was shot. I hope they also live to hear the day he was given another chance," Zuk said. The tooth has already been couriered to an unnamed US lab where scientists are "considering ways to extract [its] genetic code". "I am nervous and excited at the possibility that we will be able to fully sequence John Lennon's DNA," Zuk said.

http://www.theguardian.com/music/2013/aug/22/john-lennon-tooth-clone-dna

they should just try and clone the molar

and then sell john lennon molar necklaces

They'll have to wait for Yoko to die first, otherwise she'll fuck it up again.

I read about this today... more stupid people with more money than sense. Even if they managed to do this, the clone would only look like Lennon - does not mean he would have the talents, or make the life decisions that led Lennon to become the man he was. What a tool.

Heard this guy being interviewed on the radio this morning, he sounded pretty level headed actually.

imagine all the john lennons.

  On 8/22/2013 at 7:51 PM, thanks robert moses said:

imagine all the john lennons.

living life in piece of tooth

  On 8/22/2013 at 7:10 PM, Joyrex said:

I read about this today... more stupid people with more money than sense. Even if they managed to do this, the clone would only look like Lennon - does not mean he would have the talents, or make the life decisions that led Lennon to become the man he was. What a tool.

He would either die or consciously disappear under that pressure.

'Hmmm, this is OK, but you're just ripping off the Beatles, dude.'

this is just depressing and incredibly stupid at the same time...

Great Scott it's like we're living in the future!

  On 8/22/2013 at 7:51 PM, thanks robert moses said:

imagine all the john lennons.

lol

How much is he charging for people to have sex with it?

  On 8/22/2013 at 8:37 PM, LimpyLoo said:

How much is he charging for people to have sex with it?

What, the molar?

  On 8/22/2013 at 8:02 PM, paranerd said:

'Hmmm, this is OK, but you're just ripping off the Beatles, dude.'

xcept he wouldn't. these days he would just take ritalin instead of LSD and make deep house.

  On 8/22/2013 at 7:51 PM, thanks robert moses said:

imagine all the john lennons.

I'm onto you!

  On 8/22/2013 at 8:53 PM, paranerd said:

 

  On 8/22/2013 at 8:37 PM, LimpyLoo said:

How much is he charging for people to have sex with it?

 

What, the molar?

 

No, the John Lennon.

  On 8/22/2013 at 9:11 PM, LimpyLoo said:

 

  On 8/22/2013 at 8:53 PM, paranerd said:

 

  On 8/22/2013 at 8:37 PM, LimpyLoo said:

How much is he charging for people to have sex with it?

What, the molar?

 

No, the John Lennon.

 

Then you should have phrased it as "How much WILL he charge for people to have sex with it?", since the John Lennon isn't here yet.

And I think he will not use his John Lennon as a giggolo, though. Not sure why you are asking yourself such questions. Even if he did, you at least have to wait around 20 years or so if you legally want to make use of the sexual services of Giggolo Lennon.

the problem with this is, this isnt real. and if it is real, he should have kept his fecking mouth closed.

  On 8/22/2013 at 9:27 PM, triachus said:

 

  On 8/22/2013 at 9:11 PM, LimpyLoo said:

 

  On 8/22/2013 at 8:53 PM, paranerd said:

 

  On 8/22/2013 at 8:37 PM, LimpyLoo said:

How much is he charging for people to have sex with it?

What, the molar?

 

No, the John Lennon.

 

Then you should have phrased it as "How much WILL he charge for people to have sex with it?", since the John Lennon isn't here yet.

 

And I think he will not use his John Lennon as a giggolo, though. Not sure why you are asking yourself such questions. Even if he did, you at least have to wait around 20 years or so if you legally want to make use of the sexual services of Giggolo Lennon.

 

Obviously I'm asking on a friend's behalf.

*reads The Catcher in the Rye*

if this isn't an opportunity for feature film, then i don't know what is - following the john lennon clone as he struggles to live up to expectations. his sorrow, his slow change and his eventual fall into darkness and extreme behavior. following the dejected john lennon clone as he stealthily evades the public eye and struggles to find his own identity.

This is exactly like Jurassic Park but with John Lennon instead of dinosaurs.

  On 8/22/2013 at 11:32 PM, MadameChaos said:

This is exactly like Jurassic Park but with John Lennon instead of dinosaurs.

I would never My friend would never have sex with a dinasaur, if that's what you're hinting at.

  On 8/22/2013 at 11:36 PM, LimpyLoo said:

  On 8/22/2013 at 11:32 PM, MadameChaos said:

This is exactly like Jurassic Park but with John Lennon instead of dinosaurs.

 

 I would never My friend would never have sex with a dinasaur, if that's what you're hinting at.

You obviously never saw the porn version of Jurassic Park...

  On 8/22/2013 at 7:16 PM, feltcher said:

Heard this guy being interviewed on the radio this morning, he sounded pretty level headed actually.

JIm Jones sounded real level-headed in interviews as well.