Jump to content
IGNORED

How to Tell If You’re an Amateur Musician


Recommended Posts

Checked this out on iZotope's facebook page and I thought this article was very insightful. He's able to make the division between being an amateur and professional musician (or any artful craft really) pretty clear with a good definition on what each label means.

 

http://www.trustmeimascientist.com/2013/11/04/op-ed-how-to-tell-if-youre-an-amateur-musician/

lel, this guy is very much into his little categories isn't he. sounds like he has a real chip on his shoulder.

  Reveal hidden contents

 

i dunno, he didn't seem to be promoting the idea of "professionalism" that hard imo (on the contrary actually).

 

  Quote

According to the French and Latin roots of the word, to be an amateur is to be “a lover.” One who loves, and one who does out of love. How amazing is that? Why would we ever, in our right minds, stigmatize such a word?


There’s really only one answer to that: Insecurity. It is only an insecure professional, straddling both worlds, woefully uncertain of his or her standing, who would ever stoop to denigrating amateur musicians as a class.

And that is their key point of separation: Professionals must seek a sustainably profitable return on their investment. If they consistently lose money, then they are failing at their jobs.

Amateurs on the other hand, if and when they “lose” money, are not failures at all. Are you “losing” money when you go rock climbing, take in a movie, paint someone a picture, run a marathon, or join a community theater? Allow me to be the first to say hell no.

Whether they do it consciously or not, amateurs effectively take their cash and use it to say: “This is valuable. This is important. I want there to be more of it in the world. I want to support this. Just being around it is its own reward. And I’m willing to pay more for what I think is the most worthwhile.”

 

i think he overestimates "the value of professional musicians," but he ends on a sensible note. and the frusciante quotes were good.

Edited by luke viia

GHOST: have you killed Claudius yet
HAMLET: no
GHOST: why
HAMLET: fuck you is why
im going to the cemetery to touch skulls

[planet of dinosaurs - the album [bc] [archive]]

If you have to wonder whether you're an amateur or whatever the fuck else you wana call it then you're an amateur.

  Quote

it's meaningless. who cares? if you're a musician, you're a musician.

may as well say "how to tell if you're an amateur terrorist".

 

agreed, but that would be a pretty good article imo

Edited by luke viia

GHOST: have you killed Claudius yet
HAMLET: no
GHOST: why
HAMLET: fuck you is why
im going to the cemetery to touch skulls

[planet of dinosaurs - the album [bc] [archive]]

you join the office of homeland security, actually

GHOST: have you killed Claudius yet
HAMLET: no
GHOST: why
HAMLET: fuck you is why
im going to the cemetery to touch skulls

[planet of dinosaurs - the album [bc] [archive]]

Ha, I'm surprised by the hostility! I didn't read this thinking that he had a chip on his shoulder at all. I found his description of what being an amateur or a professional musician is to be cohesive and based in realism, not a wishful ideal. If some of you feel it's pointless to even discuss the idea, so be it.

 

  On 11/19/2013 at 7:22 PM, luke viia said:
i dunno, he didn't seem to be promoting the idea of "professionalism" that hard imo (on the contrary actually).


Yes, I felt the same way. The title is misleading. He actually makes the case FOR amateur musicians, for the TERM amateur and that really the only difference between someone who would be labeled a professional and one labeled an amateur is one gets paid just enough to live off it. So, semantically, a person who solely busks on the street to make just enough to live independently is a professional whether he has sold his music or not.

  Quote
it's meaningless. who cares? if you're a musician, you're a musician.


I think that's what the core of the article is saying with the caveat that there are some personal and outside expectations if you consider yourself professional.

hah .. i wasn't professional, or is that amateur, enough to read the article properly. So i've deleted my post. I will say though that i'll admit to not being passionate enough about anything, well motivated really, to be either professional or was that amateur about everything (well except work, but they do pay me to be there, so well there you go).

A member of the non sequitairiate.

Ah, well... ;)

If I read it correctly, the article's summary is 'amateur' is not bad word and never should have been. Like luke viia mentioned, Frusciante's decision to become 'amateur' gave him a lot more freedom to do whatever the fuck he wanted and to enjoy himself a lot more than being in the spotlight.

So a "professional" is one who makes music for a living and earns a self-sustaining income from it basically, according to Justin Colletti. Didn't seem like he took experience or talent into account tho.

 

  On 10/21/2015 at 9:51 AM, peace 7 said:

To keep it real and analog, I'm gonna start posting to WATMM by writing my posts in fountain pen on hemp paper, putting them in bottles, and throwing them into the ocean.

 

  On 11/5/2013 at 7:51 PM, Sean Ae said:

you have to watch those silent people, always trying to trick you with their silence

 

he did actually, and commented that those are not pre-requisites for making money, lol

GHOST: have you killed Claudius yet
HAMLET: no
GHOST: why
HAMLET: fuck you is why
im going to the cemetery to touch skulls

[planet of dinosaurs - the album [bc] [archive]]

I guess when it comes to an occupation it's more about who you know than what you know, as they saying goes innit.

Still, I'm not gonna pay for some artist's music if they are shit at making it, or are being blatant copycats of other stars in the industry.

Edited by ambermonk

 

  On 10/21/2015 at 9:51 AM, peace 7 said:

To keep it real and analog, I'm gonna start posting to WATMM by writing my posts in fountain pen on hemp paper, putting them in bottles, and throwing them into the ocean.

 

  On 11/5/2013 at 7:51 PM, Sean Ae said:

you have to watch those silent people, always trying to trick you with their silence

 

Emily Dickenson = amateur

 

the guy who adds the laugh track to Big Bang Theory = professional

 

 

so...

Really, Dude, you surprise me. They're not gonna kill shit, they're not gonna do shit. What can they do? They're a bunch of fuckin' amateurs, and meanwhile, look at the bottom line: Who's sittin' on a million fuckin' dollars? Am I wrong? Nothing is fucked here Dude. Nothing is fucked. They're a bunch of fucking amateurs!

Edited by MadameChaos
  Reveal hidden contents

 

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 Member

×
×