Jump to content
IGNORED

Itunes 320 vs LAME 320

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

I know there has been a lot of discussion on here about best sound quality of mp3's.

 

Is there any difference/is one a better sound quality between a 320vbrjointstereo from Itunes and one created with LAME?

 

My desktop won't burn cd's anymore, I use my bf's laptop. It doesn't have the LAME encoder on it.

I can either use his itunes and compress to mp3 or dl as wav and hot stick to my desktop and convert with LAME there.

any advice is greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks for your help.

 

 

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/88817-itunes-320-vs-lame-320/
Share on other sites

you can install lame on his laptop too you know.

and in general don't waste your time ripping/encoding stuff by yourself, 99% chance it's already ripped by someone so just torrent or slsk it.

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/88817-itunes-320-vs-lame-320/#findComment-2371864
Share on other sites

At 320 kbps both encoders are essentially transparent, so "quality"-wise they're identical. Just go with whatever workflow is easiest for the botayoouz.

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/88817-itunes-320-vs-lame-320/#findComment-2371920
Share on other sites

It may well be fixed now but in the past the iTunes encoder didn't correctly set the metadata for seamless transitions between mix albums. Would sound fine in iTunes but on any other playback you'd get a click between seamless tracks (live concerts, mix albums, fsol albums etc.). There were two bits of data inserted - one was a pre-buffer, can't remember the other - but it flagged the mp3 player to buffer the next track for the milliseconds required for a seamless transition.

I haven't eaten a Wagon Wheel since 07/11/07... ilovecubus.co.uk - 25ml of mp3 taken twice daily.

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/88817-itunes-320-vs-lame-320/#findComment-2372140
Share on other sites

This is about the application itself and using it for ripping & encoding rather than the store part of it.

I haven't eaten a Wagon Wheel since 07/11/07... ilovecubus.co.uk - 25ml of mp3 taken twice daily.

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/88817-itunes-320-vs-lame-320/#findComment-2372678
Share on other sites

Because it rips and encodes ..... wait what ?!

 

I mean I don't personally do it as I have foobar2000 but if you do, don't see why you wouldn't

I haven't eaten a Wagon Wheel since 07/11/07... ilovecubus.co.uk - 25ml of mp3 taken twice daily.

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/88817-itunes-320-vs-lame-320/#findComment-2372993
Share on other sites

  On 9/24/2015 at 6:44 PM, drillkicker said:

Why would you use iTunes for ripping and encoding?

 

  Quote

My desktop won't burn cd's anymore, I use my bf's laptop. It doesn't have the LAME encoder on it.

I can either use his itunes and compress to mp3 or dl as wav and hot stick to my desktop and convert with LAME there.

 

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/88817-itunes-320-vs-lame-320/#findComment-2373233
Share on other sites

Oh, that makes sense. Personally, I wouldn't use iTunes to rip CDs because it doesn't have a lot of flexibility. It would be better, in my opinion, to rip it and encode with LAME, but that's because I don't trust iTunes for anything except playing and organizing audio.

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/88817-itunes-320-vs-lame-320/#findComment-2373359
Share on other sites

Guest bitroast

if using just go into settings > Import Settings and you can fiddle with compression settings. set it to 320 variable or fixed. it's what i used tbh cos its v easy

(altho i tend to have no idea where itunes saved the new files without immediately doing a file search for one of the tracks and finding the folder).

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/88817-itunes-320-vs-lame-320/#findComment-2373477
Share on other sites

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 Member

×
×