Now Reading

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hecatomb

I watched the series 3 times and have also seen the original 1963 film adaptation, “the haunting”.

 The series is fantastic but it is loosely based on the characters and themes in the book, where as the 1963 film is a pretty truthful adaptation.
I’m a little over halfway through the book and it’s a page turner. The main thing that the series carries over from the book is the sickly sense of madness that comes through in Eleanor’s inner thoughts and monologues. As if we’re being seduced into a spider’s web by some psychic monster. 
I’m definitely going to have to rewatch the series again now

  On 5/14/2023 at 4:02 PM, ooqpoo said:

Haruki Murakame's Killing Commendatore. The people and locations in this book stuck with me from since a previous read through (where for some reason I got sidetracked and never finished it) In the three or so years since, certain situations or thoughts would conjure the pit & shrine, Tomohiko's mountain house or Menshiki's mansion up clear as a place I'd once visited in real life, so naturally I was immersed doubly this time round.

Loved this guy's books since I was given Wind Up Bird Chronicle around 2010 and recently reread Kafka on the Shore aswell, which used to be my 2nd favorite after IQ84, but I reckon Commendatore has nudged it into 3rd place. 

And recently found out his new novel, The City And Its Uncertain Walls, has been released in Japan! Wonder how long we'll have to wait for a translation.. 

Expand  

I finally picked up Kafka on the Shore. About a third of the way through and so so very enjoyable. 

I’m gonna read Blood Meridian again now that McCarthy passed away. Thoughts from y’all?

who all enjoys Ligotti? I just picked up Songs of a Dead Dreamer + Grimscribe for my first foray.

  On 6/15/2023 at 12:02 AM, DyeMyBlueBlack said:

I’m gonna read Blood Meridian again now that McCarthy passed away. Thoughts from y’all?

do.

Ligotti fan here. The first story in that collection you got, "Frolic," is super creepy, though most people (reviews, anyway) don't seem to think that highly of it... and it's kind of an anomaly among the other stories. Weird starter. That said, I felt compelled to tell a friend of mine, who had just become a dad, to skip it. 

The collection felt a bit uneven in spots (I think it's his early stuff?), but there are some real gems in there. IIRC "Vasterian" and "The Last Feast of Harlequin" are both in there somewhere, and they're awesome. I also loved "Nethescurial," though it is a VERY direct homage to Lovecraft (with some good commentary on itself in the first half). I liked that one so much I narrated it. One of the best ending lines in a short story I've ever read. Grimscribe > Songs, IMO. 

sweet m8

For reasons I no longer remember, JR Ackerley's "Hindoo Holiday" popped up on the top of my reading list. Dutifully worked through it, was entertained.

It's supposedly the diary of an openly homosexual British man during a five month stay at the court of a minor (and equally homosexual) Indian raja. The quest for pretty young boys is a bit tiresome but other than that it was an interesting and fairly amusing visit to a world now (thankfully) long gone.

A quick read, +1 would recommend.

  On 6/15/2023 at 8:22 AM, usagi said:

who all enjoys Ligotti? I just picked up Songs of a Dead Dreamer + Grimscribe for my first foray.

do.

Lol - I remember one paragraph by heart:

”Like beings provoked out of the absolute rock and set nameless and at no remove from their own loomings to ramble ravenous and and doomed and mute as gorgons shambling the brutal wastes of Gondwanaland at a time when nomenclature was and each was all”

I've just ordered a hardcover version of Blood Meridian. It's the best book I've ever read. RIP Cormac McCarthy 

  On 8/23/2021 at 7:10 PM, dcom said:

For a more modern take on those issues I'd suggest Nick Bostrom's Superintelligence, and Max Tegmark's Life 3.0.

this bostrom dudes basicaly a fascist , he pontificates on the most obscure bullshit "the ai in the box is gona use radio waves to rearrange the atoms into a knife to escape from the box" other bullshit type ideas, its all hype, "the ai creators are too powerful, theyre like gods, unleashing pandoras box" give me a break , the guys such a fool

what he doesnt see under his nose is capital itself is the super ai he claims to worry about, it exists in the balance sheets, in the machinery, in the emergent computations of the supply chains, in the supercomputers running the ecnomy for profit. 

the dude might have a big brain iq but hes a dunce and a fool, a useful tool and distraction for his other "long termist" fascist buddies  and evil folks

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006295222000405

decided to read Industrial Society & Its Future by Mr. Unicycle himself. It's....okay? Not very well-reasoned, but his whole thing about needing effort-based goals in our lives and how modern society foils that (except by giving us a desire for "surrogate goals") and cannot be reformed is interesting. I'm not done with it yet, but idk. He trashes "leftists" repeatedly but then also throws in a paragraph starting with "The conservatives are fools." So, you know, both sides.

also reading some Nietzsche for the first time in my life (I once heard that Nietzsche was a "young man's philosophy" so naturally waited until my late 30s to read him, being an iconoclastic stable genius myself). Started with Human, All Too Human, which felt like a good introduction, and I bookmarked quite a few pages, but there was plenty to dislike. I'm about halfway through Thus Spake Zarathustra now and it's a slog, ngl. I can see why it's hailed as a literary achievement, but again I disagree with most of what he's saying, so yeah. Trying to reserve judgment until I get through some more of his stuff, but idk how much time I want to spend with the guy. Might get through Beyond Good & Evil and call it quits. 

also recently read: Emmanuel Swedenborg's Divine Love & Wisdom, which was equal parts insane and profound; a few books on Platonic metaphysics by Tim Addey, who follows Proclus' teachings - not easy stuff, but I do love neoplatonism; and Crime & Punishment, which is absolutely a fantastic novel. And it's what made me pick up Nietzsche, though Dostoevsky is 1000% better, fairer, and clearer in his (well, Raskolnikov's) philosophy.

edit: finished Kaczynski's essay and it was, unsurprisingly, not great. pretty much what you'd expect... cracked luddite revolutionary manifesto. sadly not hard to understand his frustration with modern society, though. 

  On 7/6/2023 at 4:20 AM, luke viia said:

decided to read Industrial Society & Its Future by Mr. Unicycle himself. It's....okay? Not very well-reasoned, but his whole thing about needing effort-based goals in our lives and how modern society foils that (except by giving us a desire for "surrogate goals") and cannot be reformed is interesting. I'm not done with it yet, but idk. He trashes "leftists" repeatedly but then also throws in a paragraph starting with "The conservatives are fools." So, you know, both sides.

also reading some Nietzsche for the first time in my life (I once heard that Nietzsche was a "young man's philosophy" so naturally waited until my late 30s to read him, being an iconoclastic stable genius myself). Started with Human, All Too Human, which felt like a good introduction, and I bookmarked quite a few pages, but there was plenty to dislike. I'm about halfway through Thus Spake Zarathustra now and it's a slog, ngl. I can see why it's hailed as a literary achievement, but again I disagree with most of what he's saying, so yeah. Trying to reserve judgment until I get through some more of his stuff, but idk how much time I want to spend with the guy. Might get through Beyond Good & Evil and call it quits. 

also recently read: Emmanuel Swedenborg's Divine Love & Wisdom, which was equal parts insane and profound; a few books on Platonic metaphysics by Tim Addey, who follows Proclus' teachings - not easy stuff, but I do love neoplatonism; and Crime & Punishment, which is absolutely a fantastic novel. And it's what made me pick up Nietzsche, though Dostoevsky is 1000% better, fairer, and clearer in his (well, Raskolnikov's) philosophy.

 

edit: finished Kaczynski's essay and it was, unsurprisingly, not great. pretty much what you'd expect... cracked luddite revolutionary manifesto. sadly not hard to understand his frustration with modern society, though. 

Expand  

I am in the third part ofThus Spoke Zarathustra, and the book is pretty funny to read, the guy was really a good writer... but he (Nietzche) has the image on his head of him being otherwordly intelligent and the most elevated, but the rest of mortals around were all kinds of scums. While you read it, you can sense his hate for almost all humanity, and the sad thing he seems to be right on all those kinds of funny labels he puts on some collectives. He tries to dig deep in the concepts of augmentated personal will, power and freedom which is good inspiration. Part 3 and 4 seems to be dedicated more to mysticism and the eternal recurrence stuff, a concept I do not really support much, because I cant wrap my mind around it, in its literal supposed sense.

More interpretations about it: https://philosophybreak.com/articles/eternal-recurrence-what-did-nietzsche-really-mean/

  On 2/22/2023 at 8:55 AM, prdctvsm said:

 jus started :

Expand  

RIP Cormy. I'm actually good friends with the German translator, and he gave me a copy, so I' guess I'm gonna read that.

  On 6/15/2023 at 12:02 AM, DyeMyBlueBlack said:

I’m gonna read Blood Meridian again now that McCarthy passed away. Thoughts from y’all?

  On 7/1/2023 at 9:46 PM, chim said:

I've just ordered a hardcover version of Blood Meridian. It's the best book I've ever read. RIP Cormac McCarthy 

Blood Meridian is due before that, somehow never read it.

Before that, however, I'll have to finish American Psycho and Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, the latter of which I've started like four times since high school and never seen it through to the end. It's become something like my white whale, and this time I'm determined to harpoon the shit outta the mofo.

  On 7/8/2023 at 3:38 PM, IDEM said:

RIP Cormy. I'm actually good friends with the German translator, and he gave me a copy, so I' guess I'm gonna read that.

 

 

Blood Meridian is due before that, somehow never read it.

Before that, however, I'll have to finish American Psycho and Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, the latter of which I've started like four times since high school and never seen it through to the end. It's become something like my white whale, and this time I'm determined to harpoon the shit outta the mofo.

Expand  

Read American Psycho and Blood Meridian together - it’s like the same personality in vastly different worlds 

  On 7/12/2023 at 9:08 AM, DyeMyBlueBlack said:

Read American Psycho and Blood Meridian together - it’s like the same personality in vastly different worlds 

 

Yeah, I know that BEE counts it among his most favorite books; definitely an influence.

  On 7/12/2023 at 11:19 AM, IDEM said:

Yeah, I know that BEE counts it among his most favorite books; definitely an influence.

What’s BEE

  On 7/12/2023 at 1:18 PM, DyeMyBlueBlack said:

What’s BEE

Bret Easton Ellis, lol.

  On 7/7/2023 at 11:48 AM, Milwaukeeeee said:

I am in the third part ofThus Spoke Zarathustra, and the book is pretty funny to read, the guy was really a good writer... but he (Nietzche) has the image on his head of him being otherwordly intelligent and the most elevated, but the rest of mortals around were all kinds of scums. While you read it, you can sense his hate for almost all humanity, and the sad thing he seems to be right on all those kinds of funny labels he puts on some collectives. He tries to dig deep in the concepts of augmentated personal will, power and freedom which is good inspiration. Part 3 and 4 seems to be dedicated more to mysticism and the eternal recurrence stuff, a concept I do not really support much, because I cant wrap my mind around it, in its literal supposed sense.

More interpretations about it: https://philosophybreak.com/articles/eternal-recurrence-what-did-nietzsche-really-mean/

Expand  

so I ended up really liking TSZ. (much more than Human, All Too Human.) Each of the four parts got better and more engaging - maybe I was just getting used to the style, not sure, but by the end I was pretty well sucked into its dreamy allegorical world. 

  On 7/14/2023 at 9:52 PM, luke viia said:

so I ended up really liking TSZ. (much more than Human, All Too Human.) Each of the four parts got better and more engaging - maybe I was just getting used to the style, not sure, but by the end I was pretty well sucked into its dreamy allegorical world. 

  Reveal hidden contents

Eternal Recurrence is an interesting idea, not sure how I feel about it. It's empowering in a way, finding the will to endlessly repeat things because that is just how things are anyway (I liked the imagery of the gateway and two endless roads that Zarathustra comes upon with the dwarf). I guess my objection is that since we all have such different experiences, some obviously full of far more circumstantial sorrow and pain than others, that trying to use a blanket criteria of being able to say an "eternal yes" to one's life repeating forever seems cruelly unrealistic. I could be misunderstanding it though.

  Reveal hidden contents

time is a flat circle

 

Expand  

Haven't seen this movie yet, seems cheesy af, and Arman Assante aka Rico from Judge Dredd acts as Nietzsche (massively random cast one could think for that role), but seems a promising movie to enjoy around in a summer night

  On 7/15/2023 at 6:06 PM, Milwaukeeeee said:

Haven't seen this movie yet, seems cheesy af, and Arman Assante aka Rico from Judge Dredd acts as Nietzsche (massively random cast one could think for that role), but seems a promising movie to enjoy around in a summer night

 

Expand  

I think you might be better off with Yalom's book, which isn't bad.

great read. especially if there are aging and/or terminally ill people in your life (as there are in mine). 

  On 7/6/2023 at 4:20 AM, luke viia said:

decided to read Industrial Society & Its Future by Mr. Unicycle himself. It's....okay? Not very well-reasoned, but his whole thing about needing effort-based goals in our lives and how modern society foils that (except by giving us a desire for "surrogate goals") and cannot be reformed is interesting. I'm not done with it yet, but idk. He trashes "leftists" repeatedly but then also throws in a paragraph starting with "The conservatives are fools." So, you know, both sides.

also reading some Nietzsche for the first time in my life (I once heard that Nietzsche was a "young man's philosophy" so naturally waited until my late 30s to read him, being an iconoclastic stable genius myself). Started with Human, All Too Human, which felt like a good introduction, and I bookmarked quite a few pages, but there was plenty to dislike. I'm about halfway through Thus Spake Zarathustra now and it's a slog, ngl. I can see why it's hailed as a literary achievement, but again I disagree with most of what he's saying, so yeah. Trying to reserve judgment until I get through some more of his stuff, but idk how much time I want to spend with the guy. Might get through Beyond Good & Evil and call it quits. 

also recently read: Emmanuel Swedenborg's Divine Love & Wisdom, which was equal parts insane and profound; a few books on Platonic metaphysics by Tim Addey, who follows Proclus' teachings - not easy stuff, but I do love neoplatonism; and Crime & Punishment, which is absolutely a fantastic novel. And it's what made me pick up Nietzsche, though Dostoevsky is 1000% better, fairer, and clearer in his (well, Raskolnikov's) philosophy.

 

edit: finished Kaczynski's essay and it was, unsurprisingly, not great. pretty much what you'd expect... cracked luddite revolutionary manifesto. sadly not hard to understand his frustration with modern society, though. 

Expand  

His writings aren't all wrong and I believe there was merit to his fears, but none of it is very original and it has been covered by earlier philosophers, ones who didn't overreact with pipe bombs.