54 cymru beats melody...

theres really nothing to change on any aphex track, its kinda blasphemous.

well

except pigeon street, that shit should be longer.

oh, that's a load of BS, plenty of stuff i'd change on plenty of tracks, espeically his earlier, less refined works -- but you don't have to take my word for it.

:laughing:

not tuk but

POC !

also don't forget the double drukqs thing.

I will prove soon that's intentionnal, but my double curriculum at uni demands me a lot of time (yeah i'm very double in life actually).

One more thing :

@ : 1:50 there is a sample saying something like :

"Copy paper"

"Poppy fire"

what is he actualy saying ?

break free from the chains of academia babar

unleash your afx forum potential

busy elephant.

  hahathhat said:

break free from the chains of academia babar

 

 

unleash your afx forum potential

You don't want to see that, hat. Once I got into a 25 pages argument about double drukQs on a french forum, alone against all the other. But you know, frenchies are really hoity-toity people, so it's pretty easy to troll them. Actually tt'was worthy of an elephant. After that i winded up here, and i must admit WATMM is comfortable !

an oliphant never repentz

I think it's supposed to be just short enough to suck you into the vortex of Aphex.

  Babar said:

One more thing :

@ : 1:50 there is a sample saying something like :

"Copy paper"

"Poppy fire"

 

what is he actualy saying ?

"mummy bear"

"daddy bear"

Baby bear!

1. the entire musical phrase is actually from 1:21 to 1:49

2. the song only starts getting good (IMO) at 3:40, everytime i listen i usually skip to that part (I even made a dnb mix onetime that used this track and cut at that part, but that was like 6 years ago)

3. whoever has marilyn manson in their avatar on an aphex twin forum: fuck you

  Pete is your friend said:

had afx posted that track on the YLC forum you guys wouldve totally fucked that song up . . . seriously :/

lol are you for real?

  danknugz said:

2. the song only starts getting good (IMO) at 3:40, everytime i listen i usually skip to that part (I even made a dnb mix onetime that used this track and cut at that part, but that was like 6 years ago)

0:00 - 3:40 is where SHIT GOES DOWN African American, 3:40 onwards, is sorter like the come down.

down

down

down

down

down

yeah well im a stoner not an acid head so i like the more groovier come down stuff not the crazy i ate 10 hits of acid shit, not that it isn't cool too though

second thoughts it isnt really a come down, it comes in with those harsh industrial type sounds... who cares the whole song is amazing, the bear bit is a bit fuckin random. but i think that melody should have been progressed more or something, not repeated just more of those synths would've been nice

Aphex play goods drums.

Aphex Twins

N.I.G.G.A

N

I

G

G

A

N

I

G

G

A

whats the point in setting it to say African American when someone says NIIGGAAAAAAA

What are we discussing, again?

Oh, yeah, TOK.

  danknugz said:

1. the entire musical phrase is actually from 1:21 to 1:49

2. the song only starts getting good (IMO) at 3:40, everytime i listen i usually skip to that part (I even made a dnb mix onetime that used this track and cut at that part, but that was like 6 years ago)

3. whoever has marilyn manson in their avatar on an aphex twin forum: fuck you

the fact you cant tell the difference between an avatar and a sig is a strong indication i shouldnt even waste my time with you :)

I would like Tha to be about 4 times longer but you know what he made it how it is, and who the H are you to say that's wrong?

Personally, I think all AFX's songs are too boring. Bucephalus Bouncing Ball, for example, should sound exactly like this:

(note: it's a bit breakcore.)

Listening now.

when i 1st heard Vordhosbn i was a bit dispointed with how it ended, should be alot longer

i think the chosen lords are the only ones i wouldnt change

  Dragon said:

Personally, I think all AFX's songs are too boring. Bucephalus Bouncing Ball, for example, should sound exactly like this:

 

(note: it's a bit breakcore.)

No.