Jump to content

Recommended Posts

security-wise, chrome (- google updater) is a million miles ahead of other browsers because of the way it implements sandboxing

Edited by kaini
  On 5/7/2013 at 11:06 PM, ambermonk said:

I know IDM can be extreme

  On 6/3/2017 at 11:50 PM, ladalaika said:

this sounds like an airplane landing on a minefield

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/44414-google-chrome/page/2/#findComment-1004506
Share on other sites

Guest Pilcat

F11 isn't doing shit in my chrome, neither is there a fullscreen option under the menu

Perhaps an update is required...

 

And yes, there is something like incognito for FF, I use it on my mac. It's an addon called Distrust- https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1559

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/44414-google-chrome/page/2/#findComment-1004732
Share on other sites

  Joyrex said:
  chris moss acid said:
so i was getting a bit bored with firefox so i though id download google crome and its pretty nice

 

anyone got any hits or tricks to enhance my internet surfing with google crome?

 

Nope - Chrome just works. That's what makes it so great. And it's blazingly fast.

 

is chrome mac ready yet?

 

then is does not work.

 

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/44414-google-chrome/page/2/#findComment-1004787
Share on other sites

  autopilot said:
Especially considering Macs are renown for 3rd party software support.

 

i guess i don't care about support, i just want to give chrome a spin on my mac. i've heard positive things about it.

 

the only times i've used tech support for any product (hp printer/copier/scanner, my wife's hp tower, my wife's hp photo printer, wait a sec - i detect a pattern here) i've hung up with the friendly indian fellow wishing i had the last 2-5 hours of my life back. i can't see google being much different. and software support for a browser? really? does such a thing exist?

 

i was surprised chrome was even released before a mac version was ready to roll. i guess i thought mac had begun to approach the PC in popularity.

 

my mistake.

Edited by pattern recognition
Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/44414-google-chrome/page/2/#findComment-1004817
Share on other sites

Guest fiznuthian

chrome will never be as good as firefox until it supports some kind of plugin system.

 

i love tweaking firefox all out to elimate bajillions of ads, knock some of the tougher popups out of the water, handle links in various ways, speed it up, make it look the way i want, etc.

 

kindof sad really because i like chrome and really want to use it, but at the end of the day i find myself unsatisfied because it's just not all there..

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/44414-google-chrome/page/2/#findComment-1004819
Share on other sites

Guest fiznuthian
  pattern recognition said:
  autopilot said:
Especially considering Macs are renown for 3rd party software support.

 

i guess i don't care about support, i just want to give chrome a spin on my mac. i've heard positive things about it.

 

the only times i've used tech support for any product (hp printer/copier/scanner, my wife's hp tower, my wife's hp photo printer, wait a sec - i detect a pattern here) i've hung up with the friendly indian fellow wishing i had the last 2-5 hours of my life back. i can't see google being much different. and software support for a browser? really? does such a thing exist?

 

i was surprised chrome was even released before a mac version was ready to roll. i guess i thought mac had begun to approach the PC in popularity.

 

my mistake.

 

google doesn't really have much of a relationship with apple

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/44414-google-chrome/page/2/#findComment-1004821
Share on other sites

  abracadabra said:
any reason for one to switch from Opera to Chrome?

 

i was a happy opera man before i tried chrome. compared to chrome opera is pretty slow and that's saying a lot. before chrome i thought opera was the best browser out there. i want my browser to be fast and it should be able to show most pages without any problems...don't really care about all the extra bells and whistles. that's why FF never sat well with me, to get it to look like i wanted i had to download a million add-ons and further slow it down and bloat the shit out of it. crap, imo.

 

for the clean and fast internet experience, chrome is the way to go.

Rc0dj.gifRc0dj.gifRc0dj.gif

last.fm

the biggest illusion is yourself

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/44414-google-chrome/page/2/#findComment-1004889
Share on other sites

...and now I'm done with it.

 

Some of the design choices are really ass backwards having been raised on IE & FF (like no mousewheel click & scroll, auto-opening mp3 files in Quicktime without a help option to set it to auto-download, etc etc). Plus, chrome doesn't look right maximised in Vista. It still has a border on the right and bottom sides for some reason.

 

I'll stick with FF3.

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/44414-google-chrome/page/2/#findComment-1004894
Share on other sites

  jefferoo said:
I've been looking for a reason to ditch ff. I guess this is it, huh?

*edit*

fuck, nevermind... not out for mac yet. bogus.

 

Should get a stable beta by this fall, if not sooner.

 

  thehauntingsoul said:
there was an article about google chrome on wired.com about how they bundle it with the google desktop updater. This program constantly chuggs away in the background, there is no way to disable it and instead of working like normal updaters and checking for updates once per day, it is ALWAYS running and if there was ever a virus released into the update system, every single user with that software on their computer would be infected whether they like it or not. It doesn't even give you the choice to download an update or not.

 

after about 10 minutes of heated battle with wired's search engine i dug the article up here

http://blog.wired.com/business/2009/02/why-googles-sof.html

 

I find that hard to believe... and what's constantly running is the Google Desktop indexer, not the updater - why would an updater run continuously?

 

  Rubin Farr said:
try going to ign.com it froze on me every time.

 

IGN works fine for me - make sure some third party software (like Ad Aware or something) isn't conflicting, and that you have Flash 9.0 or higher installed.

 

 

  pattern recognition said:
is chrome mac ready yet?

 

then is does not work.

 

This fall, although a very shaky alpha was compiled and released (not by Google) today. I wouldn't bother until Google officially unveils something.

 

  abracadabra said:
any reason for one to switch from Opera to Chrome?

 

Faster than Opera, but other than that, nothing really. I like Opera too.

 

  fiznuthian said:
chrome will never be as good as firefox until it supports some kind of plugin system.

 

i love tweaking firefox all out to elimate bajillions of ads, knock some of the tougher popups out of the water, handle links in various ways, speed it up, make it look the way i want, etc.

 

kindof sad really because i like chrome and really want to use it, but at the end of the day i find myself unsatisfied because it's just not all there..

 

Once Chrome 2.0 (non beta) comes out, they will support user scripts (a la Greasemonkey) that will offer extendability - as a longtime Firefox user, I thought extensions were very handy, but after using Chrome for a period of time, I've seen that most of that is bloat and really not needed - think again about what the application is for - a web browser, for viewing web pages. All that extra fluff that extensions offer is nice, but really, other dedicated apps do a better job in most cases.

 

 

  autopilot said:
...and now I'm done with it.

 

Some of the design choices are really ass backwards having been raised on IE & FF (like no mousewheel click & scroll, auto-opening mp3 files in Quicktime without a help option to set it to auto-download, etc etc). Plus, chrome doesn't look right maximised in Vista. It still has a border on the right and bottom sides for some reason.

 

I'll stick with FF3.

 

Mousewheel click and scroll works for me, and setting the download option to always ask where to save files before downloading will prevent it auto-opening in Quicktime.

 

And this is just my opinion, but nothing looks right in Vista, including Vista itself. Worst OS since Windows ME MS has released.

 

WATMM-Records-Signature-Banner-500x80.jpg

 

Follow WATMM on Twitter: @WATMMOfficial

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/44414-google-chrome/page/2/#findComment-1005034
Share on other sites

  autopilot said:
...and now I'm done with it.

 

Some of the design choices are really ass backwards having been raised on IE & FF (like no mousewheel click & scroll, auto-opening mp3 files in Quicktime without a help option to set it to auto-download, etc etc). Plus, chrome doesn't look right maximised in Vista. It still has a border on the right and bottom sides for some reason.

 

I'll stick with FF3.

 

give it a lil more time. after a while you'll be surprised you ever thought FF was good. also you can always right click -> save link as.

 

and btw click & scroll works fine for me, but maybe that's cus im using a developers beta. anyway what's the version number on yours?

 

ZOMG! Lazerz pew pew pew!!!!11!!1!!!!1!oneone!shift+one!~!!!

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/44414-google-chrome/page/2/#findComment-1005042
Share on other sites

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 Member

×
×