Circumcision

  Yegg said:

Someone should make a poll based on this chart.

not as much fun when it's anonymous . . i want to be able to look at people's posts and think "#5, #8, #2"

i'm more of a 2 man myself, though my foreskin doesn't protrude as much, in a way that is more gentle and stately

yay for phimosis out of the closet! now we can slap our phimotized foreskins together!)~~~~~~~~~

im nowhere near a 2. more a 4/6.

when i'm boned out i mean

  Yegg said:

Someone should make a poll based on this chart.

 

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

barely nsfw

 

Some of these are quite exotic.

#1 is the arse-end of an earthworm, surely?

and #8 just confuses me

#9

#9 . . . #9 . . .

#3 . . "the larch"

yeah this is just gonna be 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 6, 9

We should have an mspaint your own penis avatar week.

erect or not?

or.. av and sig week

every chick i've been with has told me my penis was perfect

i am uncut

is there anybody on this earth that really has a #10? and if so, would they admit?

I still can't get over #5. It looks like a pouting dog with no eyes. Poor little guy. #7 looks like he thinks he's better than you, or better than your penis at least. #8 would probably be awesome from a girl's point of view. Plus you could feel like your wang is the king of all wangs.

Nothing looks cleaner than a freshly circumsized dick. Women prefer it.

  Mr Salads said:

Nothing looks cleaner than a freshly circumsized dick. Women prefer it.

Nothing looks cleaner? Nothing in the world? Not even some piece of sterilised surgical apparatus, or a freshly Cillit-Banged kitchen worksurface?

  Mr Salads said:

Nothing looks cleaner than a freshly circumsized dick. Women prefer it.

There's nothing clean about a freshly circumcised dick. Apart from all the blood and swelling, because you've essentially cut through a whole layer of flesh, blood vessels, lymphatic system, you oose various other bodily fluids from the wound. This lasts for a couple of weeks and is disconcerting.

I have to assist with routine infant circs on a regular basis. It definitely is a barbaric procedure, one that won't be done to any future kids of mine.

Good article on the history of it in the US.

http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/1998/10/26feature.html

Whats barbaric is not circumsizing and exposing your penis to all sorts of unnecessary bacteria.

  Mr Salads said:

Whats barbaric is not circumsizing and exposing your penis to all sorts of unnecessary bacteria.

Lol, what unnecessary bacteria exactly?

the AIDS

  Mr Salads said:

the AIDS

That's like saying that you should cut off your limbs to prevent gangrene.

There are more logical ways to prevent AIDs.

you need help if you think having a circumsized cock will stop you from getting AID's!!

You are gay if you are circumsized, and your parents don't love you.

What they said. Furthermore HIV is a virus not a bacteria, but I'm picking nits.

If cleanliness and infection were really as much of a big deal as pro-circ people make it out to be, dudes penises would have started rotting at the beginning of time and some how I don't think that was the case. It's very reminiscent of how they used to perform tonsillectomies and appendectomies at the drop of a hat in years past because people didn't understand how these body parts might actually be useful.

I think you boys have a problem. Mainly it is this: I was joking about preventings AIDS via circumsizion (SP)

Still its quite hideous, but europeans arent the cleanest people either

my great grandad was a scientist and was invited to work in America (the reason was so his discoveries would be American). anyway, one of the things he proved was that the original Kellogg's cornflakes were made using the foreskins of American babies.

not all of that is true obviously but he hated the kelloggs