ascdi Posted November 11, 2009 Report Share Posted November 11, 2009 I did pick up the "In Order To Dance" R&S reissue which I'm assuming is similarly remastered. It doesn't sound bad, but then again I didn't have those tracks in the first place, where I do already have SAW1. Thanks Haha Confused Sad Facepalm Burger Farnsworth Big Brain Like × Quote Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/50145-saw-1-remasters-vs-original/page/2/#findComment-1163066 Share on other sites More sharing options...
modey Posted November 12, 2009 Report Share Posted November 12, 2009 On 11/11/2009 at 12:36 PM, Sigmund Goid said: Referring to the CD remaster, the only difference I could really discern was boosted volume, hence some of the louder tracks have probably lost some dynamic range through compression. It's an odd album to remaster since the tape warbles and various imprefections are so integral to it's sound (which R & S must have agreed with since these were left in). This is a very weak remastering job in my opinion and if I were you I'd save my money, particularily if you already have the original pressing. The same goes for the Classics remaster; these are lazy reissues for cash. yeah, probably, but i couldn't pass up the opportunity to have saw1 on vinyl! Thanks Haha Confused Sad Facepalm Burger Farnsworth Big Brain Like × Quote Hide modey's signature Hide all signatures youtube | bandcamp | soundcloud | twitter | facebook 0F.digital Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/50145-saw-1-remasters-vs-original/page/2/#findComment-1163905 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts