most ignored user

  On 11/19/2009 at 5:35 PM, Bob Dobalina said:

Got wead, cardigan, and that spazz sini on my ignore. ET is about a pubic hair away too

who the fuck is cardigan

an wead?

I know who he means by cardigan because i think i ignore that guy too, cant remember what his username really is though

  On 11/20/2009 at 12:12 AM, delet... said:

hah !! So coalbucket wouldn't know that i rarely post in genban anymore. Plus i've mostly ditched the ellipses, got tired of pplz moaning about it. Only took 10 years.

then we cool bro

SELECT name, count(1) AS total
FROM watmm_ignored_users
INNER JOIN watmm_members
ON ignore_ignore_id = member_id
GROUP BY ignore_ignore_id
ORDER BY total DESC

I was kind of surprised by who is #2. But #1 is obvious.

I haven't wanted to ignore anyone really. I like everyone.....

  On 11/20/2009 at 1:06 AM, chaosmachine said:

SELECT name, count(1) AS total
FROM watmm_ignored_users
INNER JOIN watmm_members
ON ignore_ignore_id = member_id
GROUP BY ignore_ignore_id
ORDER BY total DESC

 

 

I was kind of surprised by who is #2. But #1 is obvious.

Don't be an asshole

  On 11/20/2009 at 12:53 AM, sneaksta303 said:

  On 11/20/2009 at 12:14 AM, Awepittance said:

why does everyone think Troon is Cats, because he liks fucking muslimgauze? wtf ? thats not enough evidence, tons of idm fanboys overly worship muslimgauze

 

only one person said that i thought. I KNOW it's not him. The thought is ridiculous.

Yeah, me. Twice. And I was kidding.

Thanks for confirming he's a dupe though!

Also, Chaos, why show a list but blur out the names!?

  On 11/20/2009 at 1:06 AM, chaosmachine said:

SELECT name, count(1) AS total
FROM watmm_ignored_users
INNER JOIN watmm_members
ON ignore_ignore_id = member_id
GROUP BY ignore_ignore_id
ORDER BY total DESC

 

 

I was kind of surprised by who is #2. But #1 is obvious.

That's kind of blurry. I can't really read it.

I don't ignore anyone, cause if I did I imagine I would have a hard time understanding what was going on if other people start referring to posts by them.

  On 11/20/2009 at 1:17 AM, Obel said:

Also, Chaos, why show a list but blur out the names!?

just to show that most people aren't using ignore. the most ignored user has only been ignored 10 times. in other words, they're ignored by less than 0.3% of people here.

chaqosmaqine

everyone except clitterhaus

I reckon I'm the long name which has been ignored 4 times. Weed is number 1.

I could be the 3rd one down actually with 7 ignores, I cannot work out how many characters = blurred length.

the 2nd one is Obel

unblur that shit! maybe if certain members knew they were being ignored it would humble them.

i have everyone on ignore.

  On 11/20/2009 at 1:34 AM, Awepittance said:

the 2nd one is Obel

 

unblur that shit! maybe if certain members knew they were being ignored it would humble them.

I've often wondered if you put me on ignore because I've made some quite interesting replies to you in some film threads and never got a response :(. I don't think you do though because we had a whole terminator/aliens discussion in one thread and you're pretty cool, so I doubt it. But in reality this post is a test lol.

The 2nd one is LUDD.

no 2. is clearly LUDD

edit: that definitely makes it true

The only posters i ever came close to ignoring were calx and miya... no offense calx, it was just the manson avatar.

But ive never ignored anybody on any forum ever.

I ignore my own dupes.

Someone with too much time on their hands can easily decode that and find out exactly who the people on the list are:

recovering censored text using javascript and photoshop

I might try it myself just for fun, I'm sort of curious to see who's on that list. =P

Someone please do this.

Heh, I remember that link. I'd like to see someone try it. My bet is it doesn't work.

I think the only problem with it, is the fact that each line of text is in a cell that's slightly different coloured, and the mosaic isn't aligned with that, which may confuse the algorithm. But it'd be pretty easy to guess what font is used, since I'm pretty sure it's the one used in the forums...

  On 11/20/2009 at 1:06 AM, chaosmachine said:

SELECT name, count(1) AS total
FROM watmm_ignored_users
INNER JOIN watmm_members
ON ignore_ignore_id = member_id
GROUP BY ignore_ignore_id
ORDER BY total DESC

 

 

I was kind of surprised by who is #2. But #1 is obvious.

ENHANCE TOHSE PIXALS!