Jump to content
IGNORED

How long til we get a Flying Lotus thread?

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

Any chance of this in the future? :emotawesomepm9: (sorry if this is an utterly useless thread/question)

Link to comment
https://forum.watmm.com/topic/54711-how-long-til-we-get-a-flying-lotus-thread/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

FlyLo is interesting, definitely not worthy of a subforum though.

백호야~~~항상에 사랑할거예요.나의 아들.

 

Shout outs to the saracens, musulmen and celestials.

 

  On 3/26/2010 at 12:14 PM, chenGOD said:

FlyLo is interesting, definitely not worthy of a subforum though.

I like his stuff a lot, but I agree. Maybe genre subforums would be ok, but that's probably a bit much too. (plus there would have to be too many and some artists don't fit neatly into genres)

  On 3/26/2010 at 2:23 PM, LOL Alzado said:

Listen to Cosmogramma first, then make that judgment. He's the new bright light.

 

thats still clark's role, imo. plus, its going to take a lot more than 15 2-minute prefuse like tracks to convince me otherwise

I've asked these questions before with Clark and Vsnares.

 

They have to be British, and have to have been around for some amount of years.

 

Also, I think Joyrex has something against Vsnares.

 

So where's my Merzbow and V/vm subforums?

Is this thread even about anything? Lol. It could have easily been your desired Flying Lotus thread...but instead it's a thread about a hypothetical Flying Lotus thread and hypothetical subforums. Sweet!

I love Flylo, but unless there is a Adult Swim Bump Music thread, the isn't a reason to put him in any subforum.

 

And to be serious, I think the only serious threads we could get going are label ones: Rephlex, Planet Mu, Warp, etc.

 

Clark and Vsnare subforums would probably get as much posts as Cylob and Mu-ziq, but it'd be a pandora's box of debate over other "worthy" artist subforums.

  On 3/26/2010 at 4:40 PM, sidewinder said:

Is this thread even about anything? Lol. It could have easily been your desired Flying Lotus thread...but instead it's a thread about a hypothetical Flying Lotus thread and hypothetical subforums. Sweet!

 

lol.

 

 

 

this is a post about posting in a thread about making a thread. only at watmm.

  On 3/26/2010 at 6:06 PM, reyde_espana said:
  On 3/26/2010 at 3:50 PM, Backson said:
  On 3/26/2010 at 11:48 AM, jules said:

Clark first

agreed

double agreed

 

Yep.

  On 3/26/2010 at 6:35 PM, Captain James Mission said:
  On 3/26/2010 at 6:06 PM, reyde_espana said:
  On 3/26/2010 at 3:50 PM, Backson said:
  On 3/26/2010 at 11:48 AM, jules said:

Clark first

agreed

double agreed

 

Yep.

 

 

you know one day, joyrex will give in and there will be a clark subforum. we will all rejoice and dance and twirl while ted plays in the background. it will be great, there will be all kinds of posts for like a week. then it will turn to crickets chirping and then you'll get the mod thread close message. :aphexsign:

Edited by jules

I listened to LA again the other night, actually really enjoyed it. Am waiting for Cosmogramma in the post (unless they release the WAVs early as seems to be the flava with Warp these days).

 

Dont think he deserves a sub forum *yet* though.

  On 3/26/2010 at 6:19 PM, jules said:
  On 3/26/2010 at 4:40 PM, sidewinder said:

Is this thread even about anything? Lol. It could have easily been your desired Flying Lotus thread...but instead it's a thread about a hypothetical Flying Lotus thread and hypothetical subforums. Sweet!

 

lol.

 

 

 

this is a post about posting in a thread about making a thread. only at watmm.

:biggrin:

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 Member

×
×