funny pictures Funny Pictures - The Official Thread

what is this i dont even

hur face be awl swollded up

her face makes my eyes water

  On 6/29/2011 at 7:27 PM, jules said:

her eyes makes my face water

She has a huge fucking face.

And fuck off with the aphex reference that i know somebody wants to post. Don't fucking do it.

  On 6/29/2011 at 8:56 PM, essines said:

She has a huge fucking face.

 

And fuck off with the aphex reference that i know somebody wants to post. Don't fucking do it.

LOL

  On 6/29/2011 at 8:56 PM, essines said:

She has a huge fucking face.

 

And fuck off with the aphex reference that i know somebody wants to post. Don't fucking do it.

what the fuck is that thing?

  On 6/29/2011 at 10:01 PM, Coalbucket PI said:

what the fuck is that thing?

http://www.google.com/search?q=jocelyn+wildenstein

  On 6/29/2011 at 9:54 PM, jules said:

  On 6/29/2011 at 8:56 PM, essines said:

She has a huge fucking face.

 

And fuck off with the aphex reference that i know somebody wants to post. Don't fucking do it.

 

 

 

 

LOL

how dreadful. why is her wikipedia page deleted? what did we do before wikipedia?

  On 6/29/2011 at 11:10 PM, Coalbucket PI said:

how dreadful. why is her wikipedia page deleted? what did we do before wikipedia?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:N

  On 6/29/2011 at 11:18 PM, kaini said:

  On 6/29/2011 at 11:10 PM, Coalbucket PI said:

how dreadful. why is her wikipedia page deleted? what did we do before wikipedia?

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:N

is that really why? If her photo has been in a newspaper I thought that was enough

i laughed...but thats also fucking horrible...she has to live with the fact that she has completely ruined her face.

edit: WOW she has been living with that since the 80s?

  On 6/29/2011 at 11:24 PM, Coalbucket PI said:

  On 6/29/2011 at 11:18 PM, kaini said:

  On 6/29/2011 at 11:10 PM, Coalbucket PI said:

how dreadful. why is her wikipedia page deleted? what did we do before wikipedia?

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:N

is that really why? If her photo has been in a newspaper I thought that was enough

to be specific, it's WP:BLP1E. as a fairly active wiki editor, i'd be the first to admit that it's full of little tinpot dictators who raise a fuss about literally fucking anything.

here's the actual AfD if you're interested: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jocelyn_Wildenstein

I don't know how people get involved in editing wikipedia, everytime I've looked at talk pages it's just these horrible bickering notability arguments

  On 6/30/2011 at 1:06 AM, Coalbucket PI said:

I don't know how people get involved in editing wikipedia, everytime I've looked at talk pages it's just these horrible bickering notability arguments

it's like a battle of the retards. on one side, anon editors who when they aren't vandalising are inserting made-up shit or can barely string a sentence together. on the other, the editors in the top 2% wrt editcounts, who clearly have nothing better to do and spend their time trying to get articles deleted because they have a ridiculous problem with the article, or they're in a bad mood, or they're on their fucking period. in the middle are editors like me who get drowned out because of all this fucking noise.

witness this AfD on die antwoord's album, or this one on one of their EPs - particularly love this gem:

  Quote

Comment. A musical recording does not establish notability, based on the mere fact that it was released on a specific label. Notability of an album is not inherited from the label on which it was released. As blogs, neither BoingBoing nor Consequence of Sound are considered reliable. Pitchfork Media is not considered reliable as a zine. The Rolling Stone is notable, independent of the bands that they cover. Brief mentions or reviews, along with track listings are not considered significant coverage, regardless of the source. Regarding the notability of Consequence of Sound, the article contains no reliable links to establish notability. Regardless of this fact, you may want to review this link WP:OTHERSTUFF. The inclusion of one inappropriate article does not validate the inclusion of another.

or this, where because some random dude on the internet doesn't like stockhausen, he shouldn't be mentioned in the aphex article.

being a wiki editor is very, very frustrating at times.

John Noble's night gig.