If there are 7 billion peoples in the world

  On 10/7/2010 at 4:21 AM, lumpenprol said:

just think of how many hot chicks are taking a shit every second...

97222

(if you consider that it takes 2min to take a dump and that 1 chick out 100 is hot)

How long is the average shared sexual experience?

  On 10/7/2010 at 6:09 AM, chenGOD said:

  On 10/7/2010 at 4:21 AM, lumpenprol said:

just think of how many hot chicks are taking a shit every second...

 

 

  On 10/7/2010 at 4:26 AM, troon said:

i would love to be a fly in those toilets

 

Huh, i never would have guessed troon was a coprophage.

 

semi-NSFW (unless you work at home, alone)

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

"Is this stool taken?"

  On 10/7/2010 at 3:36 AM, troon said:

the problems don't want to get solved (that's the problem)

basically, most of the problems would be quite easily fixed if you took the humans out of the decision making process, so i don't see how some all powerful hive mind of 7 billion humans is going to help things. In fact it would probably lobby for the one thing that would make our lot on earth fundamentally worse. It would argue that we needed more people on earth, as in it's self interest the more people there are, the more power this processing device would be.

---

  On 10/7/2010 at 5:31 AM, wake said:

  On 10/7/2010 at 5:24 AM, 24ourange said:

im not offended about your thread idea, i am offended that for asking a simple explanation of the very idea this thread was supposed to be about, you, the thread creator, ignored me and acted like i was an idiot, and then attacked me personally.

So then I should assume you still don't know what the thread means? In that case, you called the thread banal and totally inconsequential with nothing to back up that statement... in which case:

Or you figured it out all on your own and now you're butthurt, in which case:

I think your math is off, wake. Why don't you break it down for us?

  On 10/7/2010 at 3:34 AM, nene multiple assgasms said:

if only we could network all the minds of the world to form some sort of supercomputer. we could harness a small percentage of each person's brain power to solve the world's problems.

  On 10/8/2010 at 7:43 PM, Braintree said:

  On 10/7/2010 at 5:31 AM, wake said:

  On 10/7/2010 at 5:24 AM, 24ourange said:

im not offended about your thread idea, i am offended that for asking a simple explanation of the very idea this thread was supposed to be about, you, the thread creator, ignored me and acted like i was an idiot, and then attacked me personally.

So then I should assume you still don't know what the thread means? In that case, you called the thread banal and totally inconsequential with nothing to back up that statement... in which case:

Or you figured it out all on your own and now you're butthurt, in which case:

 

I think your math is off, wake. Why don't you break it down for us?

K, the math here is pretty simple.. 7 billion x 1 second = 221.821352 years.

Ding.

i move to ban the facepalm emoticon for the reasons thus

1) it is passive aggresive and/or smug to respond to a post you disapprove of with such a trite collection of unwholesome pixels

2) it encourages posters to respond uncreatively

3) its use among the more eccentric and homosexual members of this board has led to a trash culture

4) anyone who responds to this post with a facepalm is a big girly faggot

  On 10/8/2010 at 11:43 PM, Funktion said:

i move to ban the facepalm emoticon for the reasons thus

 

1) it is passive aggresive and/or smug to respond to a post you disapprove of with such a trite collection of unwholesome pixels

 

2) it encourages posters to respond uncreatively

 

3) its use among the more eccentric and homosexual members of this board has led to a trash culture

 

4) anyone who responds to this post with a facepalm is a big girly faggot

  On 10/8/2010 at 11:26 PM, wake said:

  On 10/8/2010 at 7:43 PM, Braintree said:

  On 10/7/2010 at 5:31 AM, wake said:

  On 10/7/2010 at 5:24 AM, 24ourange said:

im not offended about your thread idea, i am offended that for asking a simple explanation of the very idea this thread was supposed to be about, you, the thread creator, ignored me and acted like i was an idiot, and then attacked me personally.

So then I should assume you still don't know what the thread means? In that case, you called the thread banal and totally inconsequential with nothing to back up that statement... in which case:

Or you figured it out all on your own and now you're butthurt, in which case:

 

I think your math is off, wake. Why don't you break it down for us?

 

K, the math here is pretty simple.. 7 billion x 1 second = 221.821352 years.

Ding.

I got something about 217 years, but anyway, you´ll get a better feeling for this number if you do the math by yourself.

  On 10/8/2010 at 11:48 PM, plstik said:

  On 10/8/2010 at 11:26 PM, wake said:

  On 10/8/2010 at 7:43 PM, Braintree said:

  On 10/7/2010 at 5:31 AM, wake said:

  On 10/7/2010 at 5:24 AM, 24ourange said:

im not offended about your thread idea, i am offended that for asking a simple explanation of the very idea this thread was supposed to be about, you, the thread creator, ignored me and acted like i was an idiot, and then attacked me personally.

So then I should assume you still don't know what the thread means? In that case, you called the thread banal and totally inconsequential with nothing to back up that statement... in which case:

Or you figured it out all on your own and now you're butthurt, in which case:

 

I think your math is off, wake. Why don't you break it down for us?

 

K, the math here is pretty simple.. 7 billion x 1 second = 221.821352 years.

Ding.

I got something about 217 years, but anyway, you´ll get a better feeling for this number if you do the math by yourself.

K, after using a different calculator to solve this *really* difficult math equation, I came up with 221.9685438864.

The difficult steps:

7,000,000,000 / 365 / 24 / 60 / 60 = 221.9685438864

Either way, I'm not too sure how you came up with 217.

12(months)x31(days)

edit: and i wasnt talking to you ´bout doing the math and stuff.

  On 10/8/2010 at 7:38 PM, delet... said:

  On 10/7/2010 at 3:36 AM, troon said:

the problems don't want to get solved (that's the problem)

basically, most of the problems would be quite easily fixed if you took the humans out of the decision making process

  On 10/9/2010 at 12:08 AM, plstik said:

12(months)x31(days)

Ah yeah, the 12x31 would get you.

  On 10/9/2010 at 12:08 AM, plstik said:

edit: and i wasnt talking to you ´bout doing the math and stuff.

  On 10/9/2010 at 12:14 AM, wake said:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

Sorry, I'm in grumpy-mode.

 

  On 10/8/2010 at 11:48 PM, wake said:

the joke is on you, sir, for i had already anticipated such a response in my original post. it appears that you are quite the fag and that you have just made a fool out of yourself in front of everyone on these forums.

edit: check and mate.

  On 10/9/2010 at 12:45 AM, Funktion said:

edit: check and mate.

no check before you need to edit ...

lol

wow guys it's wake

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!!!!!!!!1 :emotawesomepm9:

222

is

the

new

666

  On 10/9/2010 at 9:27 AM, Atop said:

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!!!!!!!!1 :emotawesomepm9:

 

 

222

 

is

 

the

 

new

 

666

 

 

 

:emotawesomepm9:

ZING!

  On 10/9/2010 at 11:03 AM, Atop said:

COOL!!!

  On 10/8/2010 at 11:48 PM, wake said:

  On 10/8/2010 at 11:43 PM, Funktion said:

i move to ban the facepalm emoticon for the reasons thus

 

1) it is passive aggresive and/or smug to respond to a post you disapprove of with such a trite collection of unwholesome pixels

 

2) it encourages posters to respond uncreatively

 

3) its use among the more eccentric and homosexual members of this board has led to a trash culture

 

4) anyone who responds to this post with a facepalm is a big girly faggot

 

  Reveal hidden contents

  Reveal hidden contents

By the way, I totally respect your homophobia.

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

I have heard that schizophrenics have a hard time understanding irony.....?

Is this true IRARI?

I am a scientist, I need to know!