Jump to content
IGNORED

psychologists / spiritual teachers


Recommended Posts

  On 12/29/2010 at 2:50 AM, lumpenprol said:
  On 12/28/2010 at 3:27 PM, dese manz hatin said:
  On 12/28/2010 at 11:36 AM, lumpenprol said:

threads like this remind me watmm is still a pretty dandy little oasis :beer:

tumblr_lafdjwjagb1qajsgwo1_500.jpg

you have to admit though, SR4 and Happycase making peace in a thread on psychology and spirituality is :wtf: :sup:

 

 

what are you saying exactly? :wink:

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i'm saying you're a colossal cunt and happycase is an addled hippie :emotawesomepm9:

After this I listened to geogaddi and I didn't like it, I was quite vomitting at some tracks, I realized they were too crazy for my ears, they took too much acid to play music I stupidly thought (cliché of psyché music) But I knew this album was a kind of big forest where I just wasn't able to go inside.

- lost cloud

 

I was in US tjis summer, and eat in KFC. FUCK That's the worst thing i've ever eaten. The flesh simply doesn't cleave to the bones. Battery ferming. And then, foie gras is banned from NY state, because it's considered as ill-treat. IT'S NOT. KFC is tourist ill-treat. YOU POISONERS! Two hours after being to KFC, i stopped in a amsih little town barf all that KFC shit out. Nice work!

 

So i hope this woman is not like kfc chicken, otherwise she'll be pulled to pieces.

-organized confused project

Alan Watts is one I haven't seen mentioned. Good thread... of course psychology and spirituality are connected, such is the nature of reality,

edu_venn_diagram_blank.gif

maaan.

  On 12/29/2010 at 10:35 AM, essines said:

i hate my life and i want to die.

honestly taking a look at suffering is a good start to realizing whats really going on in this place. first we must see what the world and this experience isn't

to then know it for what it is. if we naively celebrate life just based on the positive things it allows us then we are not seeing

what is really going on. things need to change, we all need to be changed but first we must be made to see what it

means to allow ourselves to be changed and understand what it is that will do the changing.

 

quite possible the most destructive aspects of many so called spiritual paths and spiritual teachers is dishonesty (some don't even know they are being dishonest)

and candy coating. it's hard to gain a following if one speaks the truth because the fact is that the truth is disturbing and not what most

people want to hear. most spiritual figures will soften the truth or make it more palatable, more interesting to the worldly senses.

some completely change the truth or come from a place of 100% self-invention.

 

that is not passing the flame and keeping it lit as we are meant to do, it is instead putting it out and screwing in a lightbulb.

troon, i know you think that everyone is under you and blind and needs to wake up, and i lol every time you post something ambiguously ambiguous to try to make a point.

Would be interesting to see some discussions going on in this thread about psychologists/theories that people may currently be reading up on. Maybe discussions over interesting theories or claims?

 

I'm reading up on a lot of John Watson at the moment

He seems to really emphasise throughout his career the need for psychology to be reoriented toward the perspectives of "Behaviourism" - a field of study which included contributions by B.F. Skinner whereby the core understanding is that environment helps to shape a lot of the behaviour animals convey (of course this goes for humans as well) therefore all that should be analysed is the behaviour (output result) of people in relation to the environment they have been conditioned by.

 

Interesting claim that Watson makes: He explains that from a very early age, when young children (between the ages of 1-2 years) begin learning to 'verbalise' the world around them, slowly building up a vocabulary beginning with nouns and moving on from there after 2 years of age. He says that from his own observations, a lot of children think aloud, meaning that when they're beginning to verbalise their world surrounding them, they talk to themselves to further understand situations and objects in the environment. Parents and society have the ability to suppress this "thinking aloud" by claiming it is socially abnormal for an individual to talk to themselves.. so then children naturally (according Watson) talk to their dolls and toys instead, as if these inanimate objects are their audience - and here we witness the suppressing tendencies of society on the mind of a child which Watson describes as unhealthy.

 

I think the processes that come with verablising the world around you and thinking aloud to help you better understand things should be encouraged from an early age .. otherwise that child could develop a mindset where they hide their inner emotions and feelings about given social situations later in life, and may find it harder to effectively explain their personal psychology to others.

Edited by Bread

bread thats very interesting. there are so many aspects that are suppressed in young children. the first ten years of a child's development sets

most of the major themes for their lives. it's said that it would be best for a child to interact with all that is primarily nonlinear for the first ten years.

linear thinking is destructive, especially for a young mind and program's it in the wrong way, linear types of education are pushed

on children at far to young an age. 1-10 is for dreaming, it's for learning how to dream, how to think about things that are not

inside the square of beginnings and endings. young people need to be given the freedom to develop eternal consciousness

outside the false boundaries of time and space.

Edited by troon
  On 1/2/2011 at 3:20 AM, troon said:

bread thats very interesting. there are so many aspects that are suppressed in young children. the first ten years of a child's development sets

most of the major themes for their lives. it's said that it would be best for a child to interact with all that is primarily nonlinear for the first ten years.

linear thinking is destructive, especially for a young mind and program's it in the wrong way, linear types of education are pushed

on children at far to young an age. 1-10 is for dreaming, it's for learning how to dream, how to think about things that are not

inside the square of beginnings and endings. young people need to be given the freedom to develop eternal consciousness

outside the false boundaries of time and space.

 

 

The false boundaries of time and space? Are you fucking kidding me?

 

Now I want you to define non-linear vs. linear thinking.

백호야~~~항상에 사랑할거예요.나의 아들.

 

Shout outs to the saracens, musulmen and celestials.

 

i think the thing that fucked me up more as a kid is other fucking kids. I wish there were schools where the kids are screened so i wouldnt have been placed in a prison with a sand box full of little jerks

Guest hahathhat
  On 1/2/2011 at 9:49 AM, marf said:

i think the thing that fucked me up more as a kid is other fucking kids. I wish there were schools where the kids are screened so i wouldnt have been placed in a prison with a sand box full of little jerks

 

i agree... and that was just in the schoolyard. back in the schoolhouse, they also did their best to ruin art, science, and many other things.

  On 1/2/2011 at 5:31 AM, chenGOD said:

Now I want you to define non-linear vs. linear thinking.

 

most accurate definition:

 

nonlinear = spirit

 

linear = mind + body

 

 

 

less accurate definition but still a good example:

 

nonlinear = right brain

 

linear = left brain

Guest happycase

Troon you should read Trungpa's "Cutting through Spiritual Materialism." He does a good job murdering your spiritual ego by showing you everything about it. Moralism and this degree of certainty in your spirituality is one of the most intense and thoroughly rigid ways for an ego to preserve and strengthen itself. In my opinion there are issues around mirroring and narcissistic wounds that you are covering up by being spiritual.

 

 

  On 1/3/2011 at 4:58 AM, troon said:
  On 1/2/2011 at 5:31 AM, chenGOD said:

Now I want you to define non-linear vs. linear thinking.

 

most accurate definition:

 

nonlinear = spirit

 

linear = mind + body

 

 

 

less accurate definition but still a good example:

 

nonlinear = right brain

 

linear = left brain

 

 

bah hah hah hah hah.

you could at least try.

백호야~~~항상에 사랑할거예요.나의 아들.

 

Shout outs to the saracens, musulmen and celestials.

 

if you have itunes podcasts check out the "Zencast" series.

 

i've begun to listen to these while i'm laying in bed getting set to fall asleep. it's a good tool to add to your arsenal.

 

seriously, do a search on itunes.

 

 

 

EDIT:

 

listen to jazz

Edited by vamos scorcho
  On 1/3/2011 at 8:25 AM, happycase said:

listen to Conversations by corn cat to sleep positive

 

see the difference? its like you've completely thrown your sexually repressive history out the window :emotawesomepm9:

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 Member

×
×