Silent Member Posted February 21, 2011 Report Share Posted February 21, 2011 It's not different, you cant make the signal more than 100% wet by putting it on a seperate return channel, that's nonsense. 100% = 100% no matter where you stick it... Thanks Haha Confused Sad Facepalm Burger Farnsworth Big Brain Like × Quote Hide Silent Member's signature Hide all signatures Some songs I made with my fingers and electronics. In the process of making some more. Hopefully. Reveal hidden contents Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/63962-extracting-the-effect-from-the-effect/page/2/#findComment-1521103 Share on other sites More sharing options...
o00o Posted February 21, 2011 Report Share Posted February 21, 2011 On 2/21/2011 at 2:16 AM, Blanket Fort Collapse said: Yeah I don't think people are getting it, we be talking about HEARING ONLY THE EFFECT and NOT ANY OF THE SOURCE MATERIAL TO BE AUDIBLE/NOTICEABLE in the end result. I'm going to look into this and try the routing ideas mentioned previously but I wouldn't surprised if this is almost impossible save for extremely rare VSTs. thats why I came up with the idea of doing it like filtering out vocals from a tune when you have the exact instrumental version. whats that method called? Thanks Haha Confused Sad Facepalm Burger Farnsworth Big Brain Like × Quote Hide o00o's signature Hide all signatures Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/63962-extracting-the-effect-from-the-effect/page/2/#findComment-1521105 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silent Member Posted February 21, 2011 Report Share Posted February 21, 2011 (edited) edit: pointless post Edited February 21, 2011 by Gocab Thanks Haha Confused Sad Facepalm Burger Farnsworth Big Brain Like × Quote Hide Silent Member's signature Hide all signatures Some songs I made with my fingers and electronics. In the process of making some more. Hopefully. Reveal hidden contents Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/63962-extracting-the-effect-from-the-effect/page/2/#findComment-1521110 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nil Posted February 21, 2011 Report Share Posted February 21, 2011 use phase cancelation to remove the dry signal from the processed/wet sound ? Thanks Haha Confused Sad Facepalm Burger Farnsworth Big Brain Like × Quote Hide Nil's signature Hide all signatures Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/63962-extracting-the-effect-from-the-effect/page/2/#findComment-1521116 Share on other sites More sharing options...
o00o Posted February 21, 2011 Report Share Posted February 21, 2011 On 2/21/2011 at 2:26 PM, lin said: phase cancelation thats what I meant Thanks Haha Confused Sad Facepalm Burger Farnsworth Big Brain Like × Quote Hide o00o's signature Hide all signatures Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/63962-extracting-the-effect-from-the-effect/page/2/#findComment-1521117 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Adam Posted February 21, 2011 Report Share Posted February 21, 2011 Yeah. But if the effect is phaser? Quote Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/63962-extracting-the-effect-from-the-effect/page/2/#findComment-1521131 Share on other sites More sharing options...
wahrk Posted February 23, 2011 Report Share Posted February 23, 2011 (edited) On 2/21/2011 at 5:07 AM, Bubba69 said: it kind of depends on the effect. If you want the sound of a flanger without there being source material, turn the feedback all the way up and put a short noise burst through it, or just continuous white noise if you want less of the boing and more airey flanger noise. P.S. effects don't generate sound on their own(in most cases), they depend entirely on a source signal. That's what effects are. This is what I was going to suggest, only with pink noise instead. White noise gets so much use but IMO it sounds shitty, because it has balanced levels of all frequencies, which sounds way heavy on the high end to us because of the way we hear (which is non-linear). Pink noise has a curve closest to that of music we listen to, so use it instead. It's not always available though if you're a synth guy, so just run an EQ over some white noise and pull the highs down. That's what this is: http://soundcloud.com/wahrk/violent-space PS: *affected Edited February 23, 2011 by wahrk Thanks Haha Confused Sad Facepalm Burger Farnsworth Big Brain Like × Quote Hide wahrk's signature Hide all signatures website soundcloud facebook patreonnew wahrk music threadKarakasa Music Aleph9 DEFUNKT TX Chip Quote abusivegeorge | WAHRK STRANGENESS AND CHARM Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/63962-extracting-the-effect-from-the-effect/page/2/#findComment-1522423 Share on other sites More sharing options...
acid1 Posted February 23, 2011 Report Share Posted February 23, 2011 I'm convinced this thread is a troll attempt. Thanks Haha Confused Sad Facepalm Burger Farnsworth Big Brain Like × Quote Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/63962-extracting-the-effect-from-the-effect/page/2/#findComment-1522440 Share on other sites More sharing options...
hardcode Posted February 23, 2011 Report Share Posted February 23, 2011 configure effects send as pre fader and turn down the fader Thanks Haha Confused Sad Facepalm Burger Farnsworth Big Brain Like × Quote Hide hardcode's signature Hide all signatures www.soundcloud.com/hardcode Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/63962-extracting-the-effect-from-the-effect/page/2/#findComment-1522483 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silent Member Posted February 23, 2011 Report Share Posted February 23, 2011 Thanks Haha Confused Sad Facepalm Burger Farnsworth Big Brain Like × Quote Hide Silent Member's signature Hide all signatures Some songs I made with my fingers and electronics. In the process of making some more. Hopefully. Reveal hidden contents Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/63962-extracting-the-effect-from-the-effect/page/2/#findComment-1522545 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Blanket Fort Collapse Posted February 24, 2011 Report Share Posted February 24, 2011 lol phase cancellation wouldn't really work because the original sound would be have such a different phase/frequency response etc. right? For phase cancellation to work don't you have to be canceling out the exact same sound? Quote Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/63962-extracting-the-effect-from-the-effect/page/2/#findComment-1522848 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silent Member Posted February 24, 2011 Report Share Posted February 24, 2011 yes. Thanks Haha Confused Sad Facepalm Burger Farnsworth Big Brain Like × Quote Hide Silent Member's signature Hide all signatures Some songs I made with my fingers and electronics. In the process of making some more. Hopefully. Reveal hidden contents Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/63962-extracting-the-effect-from-the-effect/page/2/#findComment-1523058 Share on other sites More sharing options...
GORDO Posted February 24, 2011 Report Share Posted February 24, 2011 this is almost like the "If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it" thing. Thanks Haha Confused Sad Facepalm Burger Farnsworth Big Brain Like × Quote Hide GORDO's signature Hide all signatures ZOMG! Lazerz pew pew pew!!!!11!!1!!!!1!oneone!shift+one!~!!! Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/63962-extracting-the-effect-from-the-effect/page/2/#findComment-1523075 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mafted Posted February 24, 2011 Report Share Posted February 24, 2011 (edited) On 2/20/2011 at 7:27 PM, Polymershapes said: wet. dry. and/or auxiliary effects send, with muted source channel Edited February 24, 2011 by mafted Quote Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/63962-extracting-the-effect-from-the-effect/page/2/#findComment-1523336 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts