Jump to content
IGNORED

Christopher Hitchens


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 156
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Awe that's sad. RIP

  On 11/24/2015 at 12:29 PM, Salvatorin said:

I feel there is a baobab tree growing out of my head, its leaves stretch up to the heavens

  

 

 

NO. NO. FUCK NO

 

of course he lived longer than I plan to.

  On 8/19/2011 at 11:51 PM, Luke Fucking Hazard said:

Essines has, and always will remind me of MacReady.

feared i would be reading that at some point this year, guess this was it. a great man is lost to us.

meanwhile - the local maternity ward - nurse comes in with a great big sledgehammer

On the one hand, yes he was a fine thinker. On the other, his cheerleading for the invasion of Iraq is sickening.

백호야~~~항상에 사랑할거예요.나의 아들.

 

Shout outs to the saracens, musulmen and celestials.

 

He was a sharp and witty man, but was not spared from some dumb opinions. Where are the next wave of public intellectuals who can and will criticize the establishments?

Rc0dj.gifRc0dj.gifRc0dj.gif

last.fm

the biggest illusion is yourself

  On 12/16/2011 at 1:08 PM, chenGOD said:

On the one hand, yes he was a fine thinker. On the other, his cheerleading for the invasion of Iraq is sickening.

  On 12/16/2011 at 1:39 PM, azatoth said:

He was a sharp and witty man, but was not spared from some dumb opinions. Where are the next wave of public intellectuals who can and will criticize the establishments?

 

True, and I was particularly annoyed when his editorial term "Islamofascism" became ammunition for the religious far-right, the same crowd who will mostly discredit him as foul-mouthed pissy atheist in the coming days. Still, he was a left-winger who became a fierce contrarian on that issue, not a pundit nor politician who jumped on a bandwagon and tried downplaying it later. His opinions were of his own intellectual judgement and considerations, he was never to be easily swayed by peers or public opinion.

 

As Hitchens would of said:

 

"My own opinion is enough for me, and I claim the right to have it defended against any consensus, any majority, anywhere, any place, any time. And anyone who disagrees with this can pick a number, get in line and kiss my ass."

 

 

  On 12/16/2011 at 10:19 AM, rixxx said:

I'm gutted, what a fine human we have lost, no one can ever replace.

Edited by joshuatxuk

in honor of this entertaining and always thought-provoking public speaker, I present to you....the Hitchslap!

 

 

[youtubehd]mQorzOS-F6w[/youtubehd]

  On 12/16/2011 at 1:39 PM, azatoth said:

He was a sharp and witty man, but was not spared from some dumb opinions. Where are the next wave of public intellectuals who can and will criticize the establishments?

I'm not sure how cheerleading for intervention is criticism. Didn't he spend most of his time criticizing dead people like Mother Teresa and Gandhi? However he certainly was sharp and witty, which is why I said "on the one hand he was a fine thinker. On the other..." He never recanted his support for the invasion of Iraq.

 

To answer your question - you want Lawrence Lessig, Michael Geist, as well as the old hands such as Noam Chomsky and Norman Finkelstein.

백호야~~~항상에 사랑할거예요.나의 아들.

 

Shout outs to the saracens, musulmen and celestials.

 

  On 12/16/2011 at 1:08 PM, chenGOD said:

On the one hand, yes he was a fine thinker. On the other, his cheerleading for the invasion of Iraq is sickening.

 

He was known for other things other than cheerleading wars? i guess he must be if so many people are sad about his death, thats the only context i have for him.

  On 12/16/2011 at 3:50 PM, joshuatxuk said:

True, and I was particularly annoyed when his editorial term "Islamofascism"

 

  On 12/16/2011 at 3:50 PM, joshuatxuk said:

His opinions were of his own intellectual judgement and considerations, he was never to be easily swayed by peers or public opinion.

 

i find this personally hard to believe based on his islam writings, but i'll leave this thread to not beat a dead horse (or more specifically dead man)

no because even if he was on the right side of history for certain issues, his legacy of supporting the Iraq war will last forever

but then the war in iraq is almost over, israel on the other hand will continue oppressing brownish people for no reason for decades to come...so there is still hope for him.

Edited by eugene
Guest disparaissant

it's officially over as far as the US is concerned but hitchen's position on israel didn't stop him from being a racist sexist twathole who, with the help of richard dawkins, poisoned the idea of new atheism for anyone who isn't a straight white teenage male assclown.

 

christ he didnt even talk about it that much, he was too busy defacing posters in lebanon and saying women aren't funny and just generally being a horrid clown

Edited by disparaissant
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 Member

×
×