Let's talk (explore) about earlier internet

My favorite error message that I have *INCLUDED* in a program was:

ERROR: A really big FUCK UP has been detected !!

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Disk drive error codes:

 

Momentaraly writing while seeking

Constantly writing while seeking

Momentaraly writing while reading

....

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

If you run "strings" on the executable of gawk (the messdos version, at

least), you'll see a line with this message:

 

initstate: not enough state (%d bytes) with which to do jack; ignored.

 

I've no idea how to get gawk (GNU awk) to spit out this message, but it

appeals, somehow....

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

We have a PC clone with a flakey keyboard. It often produces the error

message "Keyboard not present, press any key"

 

 

A friend of mine in a compiler writing class produced a compiler with one

error message "you lied to me when you told me this was a program"

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

My favorite was "PROGRAMMER GOOFED . . . YOU SHOULD NEVER SEE THIS MESSAGE"

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

When I was at Purdue, the IE department had a DG Nova system that would

respond to attempts to run object programs formatted for a DG Eclipse

system with the message:

 

YOU CAN'T DO THAT!

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

A library automation package I once worked on had the message:

 

Man the Lifeboats! Women and children first! ....

 

Management was not amused when the first customer called in for

support with this message. :-)

 

No sense of humor, some of those mgt. types!

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Okay, I know this isn't rec.games.trivia, but...

 

Can someone tell me the machine and editor which, when instructed to

 

MAKE WAR

 

would respond with

 

MAKE LOVE NOT WAR

 

(no, I don't know the answer; someone told me about this one once)

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

It's TECO, on VAX/VMS, and goes like this:

 

$ make :== $ sys$system:teco32 make

$ make love

Not war?

*

 

Long live TECO!!!

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Here are some that I found in reading the string-pool from Knuth's TeX:

[Note that I included these from the actual file, so the one with 'can

fix can fix' below is what's actually there!]

 

(That makes 100 errors; please try again.)

 

 

You can now delete more, or insert, or whatever.

 

 

Sorry, I don't know how to help in this situation.

Maybe you should try asking a human?

 

 

Sorry, I already gave what help I could...

 

 

An error might have occurred before I noticed any problems.

 

 

``If all else fails, read the instructions.''

 

 

This can't happen.

 

 

I'm broken. Please show this to someone who can fix can fix

 

 

I can't go on meeting you like this.

 

 

One of your faux pas seems to have wounded me deeply...

in fact, I'm barely conscious. Please fix it and try again.

 

 

Interruption

You rang?

 

 

IMPOSSIBLE.

 

NONEXISTENT.

 

ETC.

 

BAD.

 

 

A funny symbol that I can't read has just been input.

Continue, and I'll forget that it ever happened.

 

 

I suspect you've forgotten a `}', causing me to apply this

control sequence to too much text. How can we recover?

My plan is to forget the whole thing and hope for the best.

 

 

I dddon't go any higher than filll.

 

 

Dimensions can be in units of em, ex, in, pt, pc,

cm, mm, dd, cc, bp, or sp; but yours is a new one!

I'll assume that you meant to say pt, for printer's points.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

If things go amiss in Interactive Data Language, as they frequently do,

you get :

 

Something Rotten in Denmark, Interp Stack Not ALigned

 

just before the core dumps.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

My own favorite, from one of DEC's less successful versions of the RT11

linker:

 

<Assorted DEC ID fruitcake> ILLEGAL ERROR

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

My first 'C' class was under 4.1 BSD. I forgot to name my

first program with a ".c" suffix; hence the following error message:

 

% cc prog1

ld: bad magic number

 

 

which was a bit confusing to a person who didn't know

about magic numbers or what even 'ld' was....

 

Then there is my favourite, 'sail', who asks for a scenario

number from a list; if anything but a valid digit is input, 'sail'

simply says "very funny" and exits.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

The most common error message we got from a modula II compiler that I used

at an other company was "Unexpected ';', expecting ';'"

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

The early versions of TeX had this classic, which I believe the people at

Stanford even had printed on T-shirts:

 

You can't do that in horizontal mode.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

My favorite was on the (gasp!) IBM 7094. Occasionally, the COBOL

compiler would die with just:

 

"COMPILER THWARTED".

 

This was in '74. I remember, because we had a tenth anniversary

party for the compiler (printed a date in '64 at the top of each

listing).

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

rickc@pogo.WV.TEK.COM (Rick Clements) writes:

 

>We have a PC clone with a flakey keyboard. It often produces the error

>message "Keyboard not present, press any key"

 

In which case it's not really compaible. *The* message is

 

"Keyboard error or no keyboard present. Press F1 to continue."

 

Pull the keyboard lead out of an IBM (while power of), power on and

laaaaugh.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

A program called "junk" written by a student here at PSU gives the

following error message:

 

"Argument is bletchful."

 

On the Commodore Amiga, system crashes are always indicated by a black

window with a red flashing border at the top of the screen with the

words "Guru Meditation" and a number.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

This is probably just another Urban Legend, but ...

 

A large company had just gotten their first Macintosh. As Macs do, it

had a system crash, and popped up a window with a picture (uhh, excuse

me, icon :-) of a bomb on it.

 

Management ordered the building evacuated. And called the police ...

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Doing a strings on our version of lint yields this error message; I have

no idea how to get it to spit out... stack overflow, maybe?

 

"lint's little mind is blown."

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

And a graph plotting program on the Amiga uses the red box with:

 

"Hot Damn! You need more ram!"

 

When it runs out of memory.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Not to mention the MPW C compiler (not all of these may be funny to all

of you):

 

String literal too long (I let you have 512 characters, that's 3 more than

ANSI said I should)

 

....And the lord said, 'lo, there shall only be case or default labels

inside a switch statement'

 

a typedef name was a complete surprise to me at this point in your program

 

You can't modify a constant, float upstream, win an argument with the IRS,

or satisfy this compiler

 

This struct already has a perfectly good definition

 

type in (cast) must be scalar; ANSI 3.3.4; page 39, lines 10-11 (I know you

don't care, I'm just trying to annoy you)

 

Can't cast a void type to type void (because the ANSI spec. says so, that's

why)

 

Huh ?

 

can't go mucking with a 'void *'

 

we already did this function

 

This label is the target of a goto from outside of the block containing this

label AND this block has an automatic variable with an initializer AND your

window wasn't wide enough to read this whole error message

 

Call me paranoid but finding '/*' inside this comment makes me suspicious

 

Symbol table full - fatal heap error; please go buy a RAM upgrade from your

local Apple dealer

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I just got this error message while trying to spell-check a document:

 

"It seem you are trying to check the output from a word-processor. Not

only does this not make sense, but you would probably damage the file

if you tried so I am not going to let you do this!"

 

Well, what if I wanted to damage it!!!

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Well just now while switching newsgroups i got this message:

 

It looks like the active file is messed up. Contact your news administrator

and leave the "bogus" groups alone, and they may come back to normal. Maybe.

^^^^^

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

This one is not exactly an error message story, but it's close, so here goes:

 

Our department is currently developing a Diagnostics package for IBM-PC boxes,

and as one of our intermediate INTERNAL releases, we added a new menu, with

help screen etc, for a set of functions we were about to add. It went through

the normal internal review cycle, with the Dept head spending some time looking

at it as well. Unknown to us, the dept head shipped a copy to a customer to

get their comments. The memo we got back from the customer was quite funny,

and I quote:

 

The SYSTEM UTILITY menu functions have not been implemented. Therefore

no comments for this. Help for this menu is somebody's idea of a joke!

I can only assume the help will be changed when the menu functions have

been completed

 

The dept head had never looked at any of the help menus, so he didn't know

what was going on. When he came back to us to find out what the problem was

this is what he found:

 

Attention K-Mart shoppers: Blue Light special in out SYSTEM UTILITIES

department. for the next 10 days we will be taking requests for the

utilities that you think should be here. Thank you again for shopping

K-Mart.

 

Needless to say, the dept head was P-Oed, but he ignored the

 

INTERNAL USE ONLY

disclaimer we had put with the software.

 

probably not funny, just weird

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Error messages I've seen:

 

"Things are not looking good!"

 

"I didn't think this set of error conditions could ever happen"

 

"Now deleting all files. Goodbye" Then read a directory in order to make the

hard drive rattle!

 

When I was new to UNIX -> "file qwerty.asdfg has bad magic."

sounds like a real OS, no rinkydink stuff here?

 

And I knew some guys that were writing some SW to be used by local

clerical staff, and they got to a this should never happen, but we should

put in a message. Someone said the only person that could ever get into

this deep a mess is Linda, so they put a message that said

 

"Hi Linda! We wondered how long it would take for you to mess up this bad."

 

Well sure enough, six months later,

Linda comes storming in mad as a wet hen, having discovered

that error message.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

One amusing error message that I've seen is produced when you try to

restart the 'nnmaster' news program with the -k option. This should kill

the existing nnmaster so you can restart a new one- But if things go

wrong, you get the message "The running master will not die..."!!

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

In article <3335@bnr-rsc.UUCP> crick@bnr-rsc.UUCP (Bill Crick) writes:

>

>Error messages I've seen:

>

>"Things are not looking good!"

>

>"I didn't think this set of error conditions could ever happen"

>

 

This would have been a good one; unfortunately, it got caught before

the software went out (last place I worked):

 

"Shut 'er down, Clancy, she's a-pumpin' mud!"

 

The perpetrator, to my knowledge, was not found.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

An error has occured on the error logging device.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I ran a program once which had a menu of commands, including one

to get help. If you pressed the help key you got:

 

"Out of order"

 

Very helpful!

In a simialr program, if you typed in an invalid command you got either

 

"Hey are you talking to me? Try again!"

or

"Invalid command. Feel ashamed for yourself and try again."

or

"Of all the commands available you picked the wrong one!"

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

In article <13450@paperboy.OSF.ORG> bsmith@pluto.osf.org (Bruce Smith) writes:

>"Shut 'er down, Clancy, she's a-pumpin' mud!"

 

I've never seen this error occur, but I noticed while hacking graphics

routines into the Z80 portion of Radio Shack's (Microsoft's) TRS-80 Model 16

M68000 Xenix. (Note that for a while, this computer supported the largest

Unix (-like) base in the world).

 

The Z80 handled all the of the IO in the machine and somewhere imbedded in

the code was the message "Shut her down, Scotty, she's sucking mud again!"

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Back in the dark ages (1967 or so) I rewrote a large part of the IBFTC

Fortran compiler for the IBM 7040 to add in most of the goodies which

were becoming available in compilers for other machines. (The primary

models I used were S/360 FORTRAN G and the Sigma 7 Fortran, but I

stole ideas wherever I could.) Keeping track of the data within the

compiler was a complex chore (at the time I was in grad school, and

I was the only staffer on the project...can you say "long hours"?)

 

I wrote in numerous checks on the internal procedures, but didn't have

much in the way of recovery code if inconsistent data were detected

except to abort with an error message. I swiped the error message from

a GE system; as I wrote it the text was:

 

ERROR 1164 HOW IN THE HELL DID YOU GET HERE

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Here are a few gems from our Harris VOS system.

 

We got used to seing this one a lot.

 

JOBCNTRL ER 512 : WARNING: FILE GENERATED.

>he 512

THE FILE WHICH WAS SPECIFIED AS THE 'COPY TO' OR DESTINATION FILE WAS

NOT THERE AND WAS THEREFORE GENERATED BY JOBCONTROL. IF YOU DID NOT

MEAN TO COPY TO A NEW FILE ELIMINATE THE FILE.

 

The next few are pretty amusing.

 

JOBCNTRL ER 76 : NO ACCESS FOR $TOAD SERVICE

>he 76

A USER PROGRAM MADE A CALL TO A $TOAD SERVICE AND THE USER DOES NOT HAVE

THE PROPER ACCESS TO BIT TO USE THAT SERVICE. ACCESS RESTRICTIONS

ARE PLACED ON THE $TOADS SERVICES IN GENERAL, AND $CPRIOR, $PABORT,

AND $SUSP FOR INDIVIDUAL RESTRICTIONS.

 

JOBCNTRL ER 2167 : NO ACCESS TO VULCANIZE PROGRAM

>he 2167

AN ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO VULCANIZE A REAL-TIME, MONITOR, OR NRH

TYPE PROGRAM, OR A PROGRAM WITH HIGH ACCESS, ACCOUNTING FILE ACCESS,

OR SUB-SYSTEM ACCESS. THE VULCANIZE REQUEST IS IGNORED BECAUSE THE

USER DOES NOT HAVE ACCESS TO GENERATE SUCH A PROGRAM.

 

JOBCNTRL ER 2211 : IT'S NOT NICE TO FOOL POP!

>he 2211

YOU JUST TRIED TO FAKE-OUT MOTHER NATURE, AND SHE CAUGHT YOU! SUPER-

VULCAN NOW HAS YOUR NAME ON HIS ENEMY LIST, AND YOU CAN BE CERTAIN THAT

FUTURE ATTEMPTS TO RESOURCE LFN 0,3,OR 6 WILL RESULT IN YOUR BEING

ABORTED, SPINDLED, MANGLED, FOLDED, PUNCHED, DELETED, AND DEALLOCATED.

 

This last message was often the cause of a sinking feeling late at

night.

 

JOBCNTRL ER 44 : PROGRAM FILE DESTROYED.

>he 44

THE PROGRAM HAS BEEN ABORTED DUE TO INCONSISTENCIES IN THE INFORMATION

GENERATED BY THE VULCANIZER. THE DISC COPY OF THE PROGRAM MAY HAVE BEEN

DESTROYED OR THE PROGRAM MAY NOT HAVE BEEN RE-VULCANIZED AFTER A MAJOR

SYSTEM RELEASE. IN ANY CASE RE-VULCANIZE THE PROGRAM (RLIBS ALSO).

 

Fortunately I don't have use this machine anymore :-) :-) :-)

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

>From the telephone switch world -

 

Outputs required from the ALARM SYSTEM

minor alarm

major alarm

critical alarm

 

alarm system failure alarm

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Trailblazer for the Atari ST has a good one.

You press the [Help] key and the machine laughs at you.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

A friend of mine screwed up somehow when he installed Windows 3.0 on his 386

running DOS 4.01, and now he can hardly run the damn thing without receiving

the following ominous-sounding declaration:

 

This application has violated system integrity and must be terminated.

 

No one at Microsoft seems to have heard of it.

 

Also, I've been told that on VMS, if you attempt to send out e-mail with an

invalid header, it will respond with "You are a charlatan."

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Here's another one:

 

Occasionally our ultrix system will forget who you are and if you want

to "talk" to another user, the talk daemon will come back with

 

Go away. You don't exist.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

My OS (QNX) has a command called TSK (short for TASK) which allows you to

view information to do with tasks (code size, id's, son, dad, etc) when

I first saw it a friend of mine showed me the list of commands, of which

one is tsk tsk, I tried it, and it came up with the following message:

 

Tsk tsk? Have I been a bad computer?

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

When I tried to compile a program, (which had compiled nice

on a SUN workstation with both gcc and cc) on one of our old

VAX 11/750 I got the fantastic error

 

.. line 2706 compiler error: schain botch

 

(4.3 BSD and cc)

 

Does anyone have any clue to what that means ?

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

In an earlier version of BSD (4.1?) if you did [i think it was a] "who" and

you were the only one on the system, it would print something like

 

Are you lonely?

 

Anyone have a better memory of this than I do?

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I remember my old TRS-80 Color Computer. It only had 2-letter

abbrevisations for all errors. The one for "file not open" when

you tried to read/write a file was:

 

?NO ERROR

 

It amused me when it happened.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I got an error message on time while I was copying a file, and the

system seemed to be hung up. Just as I was going to attempt to abort

out the machine came back.

 

oh........ I give up.... dumping core now!

 

and the damn thing did !!!!!

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

When I was working at Mark Williams Company, I had a midnight project to

take the Atari-ST version of make and put much of the shell functionality

(as far as command line parsing, wild card expansion, and a few built-in

functions) and 'cc' into the make executable, thereby improving the speed

of builds and such. I never did finish this, but I changed the standard

$ make love

Not war?

...

to

$ make love

For heavens sake, doesn't anyone just talk anymore?

...

and considered adding a random selection of other comments, like

Not tonight, I've got a headache.

I beg your pardon?

Your place or mine?

Maybe someone else has managed to hide something like this into a

commercial package.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

When I was in college the entire school was using a single PDP-11/40

under RSTS/E. We had somewhere around 20 DECwriter II's (LA36's) for

use by the students in various places around the campus. One evening

I encountered a terrified beginning FORTRAN student who had encountered

a bug in the FortranIV compiler we were running at the time. Something like:

 

FORTRAN FATAL INTERNAL ERROR

FATAL COMPILER DAMAGE REPORT FOLLOWS

 

followed by a page and a half of register and stack dump info. This

student was convinced that he'd broken the compiler, and that he'd be

in big trouble for breaking the compiler for everyone else.

 

At another point that year, (April 1) someone (I won't say who) edited the

system error message file.

 

 

?Invalid Character At Terminal -- Please Go Away

?Unibus timeout -- send in a new quarterback

?Ouch, That HURTS!

 

And other gems. The computer center manager was not thrilled.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I worked on a UNIX system that had an editor called e. Once entered

it took control of the screen and required some highly unlikely sequence

of key strokes to exit. It was fairly easy to type e by accident so

to avoid this annoying fate some fellow aliased e to the message

You must be joking.

One day an e user decided to use his terminal and got a surprise.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

> "Error: Error ocurred when attempting to print error message."

 

I once blew away my VMS shell process by redefining the standard error file

SYS$ERROR (I think, it's been awhile). You execute the command and things

are fine, then you run your pascal program which dies with an error printed

to PAS$ERROR. PAS$ERROR is assigned to SYS$ERROR, which is assigned to

something invalid. The OS wants to tell you that the error channel is

invalid, and what does it try to do? Print on SYS$ERROR. At this point, I

got a hexadecimal register dump(!!) and blown off the system. And this was

on a "commercial" OS. How graceful.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

cd5340@mars.njit.edu writes:

 

>"Error #1: Power supply not found"

 

Or my favorite real error message, found in the User's Manual for the Atari

800 computer, which produced only numbers for errors, so you had to look up

the translation in the manual:

 

ERROR 0: POWER NOT ON

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Shortly after I started work at the Stephen F. Austin State University computer

center as a support person, we had a coed come in with a very strange problem.

She had been trying to do her FORTRAN homework, and had run across a bug in the

FORTRAN compiler (ANSF on Honeywell CP-V). On her printout was some diagnostic

information, followed by the words:

 

Break Rob's knuckles.

 

I've always wondered who Rob was, and what he did wrong.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

In article <1991Feb22.224448.18015@servalan.uucp> rmtodd@servalan.uucp (Richard

Todd) writes:

 

>I think it was a remark in the BUGS section of the manpage for tunefs(8),

>something along the lines of "You can tune a filesystem, but you can't tuna

>fish"... Alas, all I can check right now is the Apple Unix man pages, which

>seem to have had the fishy witticisms excised. :-(.

 

The unix system we used at this university a few years back had two strange man

entries that went something like:

 

$ man fish

 

would give you:

 

Don't say "fish", Bishop. It doesn't mean anything.

 

and

 

$ man overboard

 

would give you:

 

# # ####### # ###### ###

# # # # # # ###

# # # # # # ###

####### ##### # ###### #

# # # # #

# # # # # ###

# # ####### ####### # ###

 

BUGS: No life raft

 

raf

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

In article <91049.154321DSB100@psuvm.psu.edu>, DSB100@psuvm.psu.edu (David

Barr) writes:

> My personal favorite: "Oops! Error while handling error!"

> (a concurrent C compiler)

 

My favorites were from the older Apollo OS's, two of the systems errors

were (I believe I remember them correctly):

 

Can't find wicked faraway objects.

and

Can't fit 27" tape through 25" door.

 

These were actually given in response to a request for meaning from

the stcode.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

In article <27c11888@ralf> Ralf.Brown@B.GP.CS.CMU.EDU writes:

>}On the venerable Model I Trash-80, the DOS had a vector reserved for what the

>}manual listed as "Unprintable Error". The exact meaning was never defined.

 

The MSDOS 1.0 manuals had a listing for "Invalid Error".

Talk about getting it wrong.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

error messages. get this one (today, friday, MARCH FIRST, 1991) our mainframe

decided not to allow logins.

 

why was that?

 

Nobody was validated for access on february 29th, 1991 (btw, what day of the

week was that?!)

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

In article <525@bria> uunet!bria!mike writes:

>[ in regards to the expression "if (a = b)" instead of "if (a == b)" ]

>

>Think *lint*. IMHO, there is nothing we need less than a compiler spitting

>out more useless verbage.

 

The only problem with that is that many PC based C compilers don't include

a lint program. It makes sense that the programmer at least have the option

of enabling various warning messages. Strangely enough, I once comitted

the exact opposite mistake. I had a C statement like this:

 

i == j;

 

The compiler (bless its little heart) gave me the warning:

 

"code has no effect"

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

(Sorry if this is a well-known one. I'm new to Unix.)

 

Just to rehash an old thread... Today, I accidentally sent an empty mail

message, and Ultrix said, "No message, no subject; hope that's ok."

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Here is another first time post to the net. Hope it meets with your

approval...

 

I was learning PL/1 a couple years ago and for our first or second

assignment we had to split one file into two files based on the first char

on the line. The program compiled correctly and I even got output of sorts.

The result was the following line...

 

I the most critical examiner of all have determined that there is an error on

line 42.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Computers running a DTK BIOS report a parity error as:

 

Parity Error But Segment Doesn't Found

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Then there was level D of TOPS (before DEC gave releases numbers, and

TOPS was the PDP-10 OP Sys; there was no TOPS-10 (or even Texex yet)).

 

MORE CORE AVAILABLE, BUT NOT FOR YOU

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I love these. In the SunOS 3.0 source code, somewhere in the VM

system I think, there was a line that said:

 

panic ("Shannon and Bill say this can't happen");

 

I saw this one for myself, in 1986, working for a now-defunct company

that was a Sun source licensee at the time. (Saw it in the source,

that is - never saw it happen :-).

 

...

 

A DEC oldtimer told me that a DEC-10 once printed

 

PUNT

 

after a particularly misguided attempt to get it to boot, is this

one apocryphal?

 

Does anyone collect these things?

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I've heard -- or read, I think -- about some code that contained the comment

"you aren't expected to understand this". Seems to me it was in TCP/IP.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

In article <KENW.91Jul15225254@skyler.arc.ab.ca> kenw@skyler.arc.ab.ca (Ken Wall

ewein) writes:

>I've heard -- or read, I think -- about some code that contained the comment

>"you aren't expected to understand this". Seems to me it was in TCP/IP.

>/kenw

 

The Whitesmiths 'C' manual had a line like that in the bugs section

of the manual page after a particulary harrowing description of,

as I remember, an internal function.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

>From article <KENW.91Jul15225254@skyler.arc.ab.ca>, by kenw@skyler.arc.ab.ca

(Ken Wallewein):

> I've heard -- or read, I think -- about some code that contained the comment

> "you aren't expected to understand this". Seems to me it was in TCP/IP.

 

Deep inside the Teradyne hardware modeler code is a routine that feeds a

whole bunch of hex numbers into a SYS$QIO call. The only comment is

'Weird magic happens here'.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I don't collect these things, but I have one to add, and I'm hoping

someone has an Earthly explanation for it. This happened on a

VAX 11/750 running 4.3 BSD. We've all seen the "You have new mail."

message after the csh prompt, but ONCE it actually said instead

"Thou hast new mail." It's only happened once! And I swear it

happened! Has anyone else ever seen this? I don't even know what

triggered it!

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Aaah, but then I want to know about *these* strings, found

(here) in /usr/local/bin/mail:

 

Too much "sourcing" going on.

Okie dokie

Mail's idea of conditions is screwed up

~h: no can do!?

Too many regrets

detract asked to insert commas

metoo

Somethings amiss -- no @ or % in arpafix

Made up bad net name

ubluit

Who are you!?

; why =

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

The Algol compiler for the ICL 1900 used very occasionally collapse with

the message:

 

"The impossible has happened!"

 

Bill

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

In <1663@cvbnetPrime.COM> mkaminsk@cvbnet.prime.com (mailhost) writes:

>Anyway it was a Tandy 6000 (their successor to the Tandy 16)

>running XENIX (a beta version I believe). The memory has gotten

>a little foggy over the years, but I recall the wording as:

 

> panic: Z80 panic: shut her down Scotty, she's sucking mud again.

 

Tandy was big on the hidden Trek messages. On of their TRS-80 6.x

upgrades had an ASCII quote buried way out on an unused track.

Something like...

 

Beam me up Scotty, there's no life out here.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Gavin.Flower@comp.vuw.ac.nz (Gavin Flower) writes:

>Well anyway... I often used the Algol compiler on a B6700 mainframe

>and sometimes got the message:

 

> "NO ERRORS DETECTED".

 

>I rather thoght this was a more honest message than other conpilers

>gave! I felt it was not so subtle hint that one should not be

>complacent!

 

The VS/PASCAL compiler under VM/CMS (there, that's two V's already and I

haven't even gotten to the real point yet) goes one step further in compiler

honesty. If your program compiles successfully, it will issue

 

NO COMPILER DETECTED ERRORS.

 

I swear I can see the italicization on the words "COMPILER DETECTED."

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Epoch has a few funny messages in it for disasterous circumstances.

Some of them are:

 

"Holy Panes Batman, the window's missing!" - when a X window structure

isn't there.

 

"Holy PH, Batman, the buffer's missing!" - a window without a buffer.

This one has actually been seen outside the lab.

 

"Holy Vectors Batman, I can't get more lines!" - malloc failed.

 

The error message I want to put in, but never have had the chance, is

"System Error - Sureness out of Bounds". You PLATO heads know what I

mean.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Expressionist (a Mac application for doing equations) has the

following error messages in it:

 

Mysterious Error -nnn

 

Internal Error: Illegal hedge TV number. (huh?? what?!)

 

Internal Error: BlinkThere or HiliteThere messed up.

 

Bad External File System: Boy, is your system messed up. :)

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Honeywell's customer service department once got a very concerned

message from a confused customer whose MULTICS system had printed:

 

Hodie natus est radici frater

 

before giving up the (holy?) ghost. ``Today unto the root is born a

brother''.

 

This is a hack on ``Hodie natus est filius nobis'', or ``Today unto us

is born a son''. I don't know the reference exactly, but it's in

Handel's Messiah.

 

It seems a Multics hacker (allegedly Bernie Greenberg) at MIT had

inserted the liturgical allusion when it detected the ``impossible

event'' of the filesystem deciding it had two roots.

 

[Greenberg is also known for having taken notes in Latin (``for

clarity and precision'') when in the fever dream induced by first

exposure to a Rubik's Cube.]

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

In the IRC-server there are some "nice" messages, and here's a coupple of them:

 

Looks like mere mortals are trying to enter the Twilight Zone

FATAL: Major security hack. Notify Administrator.

Identity problems, eh ?

Bad Craziness

'tis is no game for mere mortals

Go away and get a life

Death before dishonour ?

Dave, don't do that...

Good afternoon, gentelman, I'm a HAL 9000 Computer

Only few mortals may try to enter the Twiligth Zone

Only real wizzards know the spells to open the gate of paradize

Trying to unlock the door twice eh ?

Use the force, Luke !

Change balls, please

 

My favorite is definitivly the "Bad Craziness" ... :-)

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

On an old Perkin-Elmer Machine, the Pascal Compiler would say:

 

"NONE of your errors have been found"

 

The compiler was smart enough to know that your program had errors anyway :-)

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Now, granted, this is something one of us here did, but our VAX precedes

its panics with the message

 

"Well, you ran into something and the game is over."

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

My favorite RSTS/E error message is "Unused error message #xxx". Somehow

I managed to get these when hitting ^C as a certain program loads.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Take this for what it's worth, but at a shop where I once worked, an

overnight processing run would sometime fail with the error message:

 

"FALL DOWN GO BOOM"

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Well, this is just a story, picked up from the early days of Usenet, so it's

possibly unfounded and furthermore some folks have likely already seen it,

but it gave me days of snickers.

 

Story goes that that some little text-edit subsystem of something or other

which had very few things that could go wrong had only one error message,

used for both user and internal errors:

 

Data potato doo-wop doo-wop

 

When pressed for an explanation, the programmer said: "well, I figured

it hd to print *something* when there was an error."

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

> When you type your mail and type ~C (typo for ~c) my unix mail tells me:

>

> Okie dokie, core dumped.

 

bash$ cat > x.c

main() { execl ("/bin/mail", 0); }

^D

bash$ gcc x.c

bash$ ./a.out

puke

bash$

 

//Jyrki

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

On the old NCR Towers I used to get the following message on the

console whenever someone on a terminal would hold down the left

(or right - I forget which) arrow key:

 

spurious multibus interrupt

 

It took us a long time to figure out what was causing the messages

since nothing else bad happened and the people on the terminals

would be looking at their own screens while typing. Anyone on the

console, on the other hand, would look at the process table for

suspicious processes, etc.

 

NCR took the bug report with a great deal of disbelief, but their next

release of UNIX didn't have the problem.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I predict that Eighth Generation computers

will compile no programs, run no applications,

and access no data. Instead they will be

designed and tuned to give a continuously

variable spectrum of elegant and precise

error messages describing your failure to

induce them to do so.

 

--Blair

"And I'm not even married..."

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

As long as we're running strings on everything from here to

Berkeley...

 

Someone in a now-junked message pointed out something from lint. I

don't remember what it was, but here's one I did find in lint, SunOS

4.1.1 (I think):

 

EDOTDOT!!!!

 

Your guess is probably much better than mine.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

In article <NICKEL.91Jul19181940@desaster.cs.tu-berlin.de>

nickel@cs.tu-berlin.de writes:

>In article <OTTO.91Jul19112520@kalikka.jyu.fi> otto@kalikka.jyu.fi

(Otto J. Makela) writes:

>

>- on SunOS 4.1 and did, in fact, see the string "Thou hast new mail."

 

You think THATS funny (it is), but strings "/usr/lib/sendmail" for a few

laughs:

 

>From the silly:-

 

You wascal wabbit! Wandering wizards won't win!

savemail: HELP!!!!

 

to the plausible but still silly:-

 

Who are you ?

Can't parse myself!

 

to the plain ridiculous:-

 

MAIL DELETED BECAUSE OF LACK OF DISK SPACE

 

- not to mention all the SMTP "HELO" dialogue...

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

What about this one (present in SunOS 4.1.1 and who knows where else)

when attempting to use the csh builtin 'suspend' from a login shell:

 

Can't suspend a login shell (yet).

 

What's that supposed to mean??? Not until later in the afternoon? Not

until they rewrite the shell? Not until you get rid of stopped jobs?

 

:-) I got quite a chuckle out of that one.

 

Tod McQuillin

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

The SAIL compiler had a number of puns on sailing, one of which was the

compiler internal error message which referred to "dryrot" (if you don't

know anything about boats and sailing, be aware that "dryrot" is the

bane of a boatowner's existence, and once it sets in your boat is

doomed...). The modula "dryrot" message seems to indicate that at least

one implementor had used SAIL.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

The classic short message was from JOSS, one of the early interactive

languages (from the mid-1960's; it ran on a machine at RAND Corporation

called the JOHNNIAC). It was on a small machine. It had one catchall

message:

 

EH?

 

this was based on the premise that the error would be so blindingly

obvious to the programmer that no further indication of the nature of

the error was required.

 

Wrong.

 

(I worked in another interactive system that thought this was such a

cute idea that they used it. This was a mistake. If you knew the

language, the cause of the error may have been obvious, but if you

didn't know the language you were in deep trouble. They extended this

philosophy to the printed documentation!)

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Well, I've seen the "You are a charlatan" in a mail context before,

though only on a DEC-20. Lessee, any DEC-20s left... :-(

 

Oh yeah, sri-nic ..err.. nic.ddn.mil.

 

bordeaux$ telnet nic.ddn.mil 25

Trying 192.67.67.20 ...

Connected to nic.ddn.mil.

Escape character is '^]'.

220-NIC.DDN.MIL SMTP Service 6.1 at Fri, 26 Jul 91 18:21:06 PDT

220 Don't Worry.

helo nonesuch.noao.edu

250 NIC.DDN.MIL - Never heard of that name, bordeaux.kpno.noao.edu

helo cc.utah.edu

250 NIC.DDN.MIL - You are a charlatan, bordeaux.kpno.noao.edu

quit

221 NIC.DDN.MIL -- Be Happy!

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

In article <ocY7bU200Vs3IeFxYy@andrew.cmu.edu>, jn11+@andrew.cmu.edu

(Joseph M. Newcomer) writes:

> The classic short message was from JOSS, one of the early interactive

> languages (from the mid-1960's; it ran on a machine at RAND Corporation

> called the JOHNNIAC). It was on a small machine. It had one catchall

> message:

>

> EH?

 

We used a language called JEAN on ICL's 1900 series. We knew this was a

dialect of JOSS but it must have been closer than we knew as it used the

same error message.

 

The JEAN error message I liked was "Your expression has defeated me" which

was generated by a program such as

1.1 X=X

1.2 PRINT X

 

I never understood this until I was explaining to someone the meaning of

recursion in Algol. To demonstrate that simpler languages could not

handle recursion I gave JEAN a recursive definition of a factorial and

to my surprise it gave the right answer!

 

To understand this you also need to know that in JEAN

SET X=3 gave the variable X a value.

LET X=3 defined X as a function.

and the default verb was LET, not SET.

 

Hence "Your formula has defeated me" meant that it had run out of store

because of infinite recursion.

 

What a pity Basic defeated the much more elegant JOSS.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Twenty or so years ago, the Fortran IV compiler for the SDS Sigma 2

would occasionally comment at the bottom of your listing:

 

WARNING: 54 - PROGRAM NOT RECURSIVE

 

(That *looks* right. I'm pretty sure about the number and the text.)

 

I was somewhat startled by the message, since I knew Fortran programs

were not recursive.

 

Eventually, in a fit of boredom and despair, I wrote a recursive

program which produced the error message. Worked fine, too. So far

as I know, it may still be running. Wasn't RE-ENTRANT tho.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

> Another fascinating message of the DEC10 at that time was the MAKE

> command, used to load the editor with a new text file.

>

> Typing MAKE LOVE, gave the message NOT WAR, before starting the editor.

 

This carried over into other operating systems, including RT-11. Another

one I remember is HELP ME, which came back with:

 

Help is not available for you.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

>From article <1887@balrog.ctron.com>, by dj@ctron.com (DJ Delorie):

> We just got this one (source file name changed to protect the innocent):

>

> "foo.cc", line 204: internal <<AT&T C++ Translator 2.1.0 03/31/90>> error:

> bus error (or something nasty like that)

 

Masscomp C compiler:

"Insane structure member list"

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

In most cases I've found that a good way to find out what you can do with

a language is to read well-written descriptions of what you *can't* do

with it. I got into systems programming in the early 1960s by reading

the error message listings in the FORTRAN compiler, first for the 7090

FMS and later in IBSYS. Of course, in today's world the vendors would

have collective apoplexy if anyone seriously asked to see the compiler

sources, and the error message descriptions seem to routinely go something

like this:

 

Error ABC123D: User Error

 

Explanation: An unknown error has occurred in an unidentified program

while executing an unimplemented function at an

undefined address.

 

User Response: Correct error and resubmit.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

>Well, I've seen the "You are a charlatan" in a mail context before,

>though only on a DEC-20. Lessee, any DEC-20s left... :-(

 

(this is what an older version of MMDF says)

 

telnet deskpro.sow.econ.vu.nl smtp

Trying 130.37.48.1 ...

Connected to deskpro.sow.econ.vu.nl.

Escape character is '^]'.

220 deskpro.sow.econ.vu.nl Server SMTP (Complaints/bugs to: postmaster)

helo foo.bar

250 deskpro.sow.econ.vu.nl - Liar, Liar! Pants on Fire!

quit

221 deskpro.sow.econ.vu.nl says goodbye to kappl.cs.vu.nl at

Tue Jul 30 22:13:43

.

Connection closed by foreign host.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I was just installing PCSA version 4.0 for DOS on a machine here, and after

the boot I got a system error. Okay, no problem, I do a quick

 

USE \\HOSTNAME

 

to see if the machine knows anything about the host. Lo and behold, it does

but it refuses to tell me:

 

Error: Success

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Don't know how to make smoke; Broken pipe

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

And finally an addition from me /Neil.Franklin@ccw.ch):

 

When I (stupidly) broke the /etc/paasswd file on my Linux 1.2.9 System

(I added an empty line before the line with root).

 

After rebooting I (obviously) could not log in, so I pressed Ctrl-Alt-Del

(to reboot from Floppy). The system printed:

 

Go away, you do not exist!

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Forwarded-by: ddt@lsd.com (Dave Del Torto)

 

My favorite Error Msg of the Day (courtesy of HP DeskScan II v2.0):

 

___________________________________________

| |

| Sorry, an unknown error has occurred. |

| This is probably a bad thing. |

| [OK] |

|___________________________________________|