WTF is with the new layout? (read thread before posting)

can we get the minecraft thread to 'HOT!'?

fucking hell are some of you overreacting. it looks fine and the problems will be sorted out in time.

Heh, you wanna see what changes Cook'd and Bomb'd made today on their site - http://www.cookdandbombd.co.uk/ (today is a comic sans veterans day special !)

For the fixed-width layout. Can you put the "width: 960px !important;" on .main_width as well? The header is still full width.

Edit: also, put max-width: 153px or so on .isUserPhoto to make the avatars behave.

  On 8/8/2011 at 8:08 PM, chaosmachine said:

in a few days you will forget what the old one looked like, and this will seem normal. happens every time.

+1 - although, is this the default layout or the one you guys chose ?? spose i should read the rest of the thread, but i'm going fer a wolk.

  On 8/8/2011 at 11:54 PM, chaosmachine said:

  On 8/8/2011 at 11:30 PM, Joyrex said:

  On 8/8/2011 at 10:47 PM, Braintree said:

Are you guys afraid the server will overheat with all these hot threads?

I know - I HATE that feature...

 

fixed. ;)

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

topics now require 99999 posts to become "HOT!"

 

lol factor 9 ;-] hahah classic.

Weird. I had an issue editing a post just now. I hit "edit" and the post just went blank. No edit page or window.

*edit*

I tried it again and now it works. Fishy.

i'm sure there's plenty i missed. feel free to add to my images

i'm working on a skin now, we'll see how it goes. it will probably just consist of me removing as much css as possible.

It no longer re-sizes posts to fit within whatever size I have Firefox at. Or maybe it didn't before but they were just naturally smaller.

Either way it's inconvenient.

I do not always want watmm to be my full screen. I never do, in fact.

here's a forum design for Real Men

yeah, i can scroll the txt to any smaller size i want, but beyond a certain frame width the site won't play ball. Also hat, getting rid of last post would be stupid, i use that feature all the time.

sure is web 2.0 in here.

I just went to insert a picture into a post and instead of instantly giving me the small handy dialogue box to insert the URL it had to load a frame right over the thread.

gay. i used to be able ctrl+v the moment i pressed the picture button. IS WEB 2.0 Supposed to be this web 2pointslow.

  On 8/9/2011 at 12:27 AM, Enter a new display name said:

  On 8/8/2011 at 11:33 PM, Joyrex said:

My fault, actually - I'm behind on the Tapatalk updates. I'll take care of that shortly.

 

  On 8/8/2011 at 11:30 PM, hahathhat said:

yeah, this is crap. i can tolerate a new layout, but i can't tolerate crap. please put the old one back. or the one from three years ago!

 

OR, you can just GTFO

Good god, it would be so great if he left!

you can stay, mr. enter a new display name, but i'd much appreciate it if you could stop posting under your dupe accounts "MAXIMUS MISCHIEF" and "sup"

  On 8/9/2011 at 12:32 AM, delet... said:

I just went to insert a picture into a post and instead of instantly giving me the small handy dialogue box to insert the URL it had to load a frame right over the thread.

 

gay. i used to be able ctrl+v the moment i pressed the picture button. IS WEB 2.0 Supposed to be this web 2pointslow.

yeah. i hit ctrl+l expecting to be teleported to my browser's URL bar. instead it loaded up some fucking frame because there are keybindings. ugh

yes, everybody take a step back.

i tried to right-click to save an image just now, and it loaded that image viewer frame with stupid animation only to give me the same exact image. i didn't want that stupid frame, i just wanted to right-click save-as. but apparently right click has now been hijacked by web 2.0

edit: try it. right click this bad boy below

works for me, i get the normal dialogue box. when i right-click and 'save image as'.

right click on images works for me

Can anyone tell me how to turn avatars off?

well, in firefox 5.0/winxp, i don't get the normal right-click menu. i don't get any menu. what i get instead is an unnecessary image lightbox sorta fing

no more off-topic posts, thanks.

one minor gripe; from http://forum.watmm.com/, you can no longer jump to the most recent unread post on the top thread in a subforum like you used to be able to (i.e. this is the top post in gen bant; by clicking a little doohickey to the left of this in top-level view you used be able to jump to the most recent unread post, and that isn't there any more)

  On 8/9/2011 at 1:08 AM, kaini said:

one minor gripe; from the top-level"]http://forum.watmm.com/]top-level view of the forums[/url], you can no longer jump to the most recent unread post on the top post in a subforum like you used to be able to (i.e. this is the top post in gen bant; by clicking a little doohickey to the left of this in top-level view you used be able to jump to the most recent unread post, and that isn't there any more)

i can ONLY go to the last unread post...

Linked in just updated today with some faggotry as well, it's a conspiracy, et and troon to thread

I think it looks alright, I need the bigger text these days.

the board index does not shrink gracefully -- it turns into a real mess. here is a demonstration!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGF53_TD_Co