Jump to content
IGNORED

9/11/01, ten years later.


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 155
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  On 9/11/2011 at 4:32 PM, Smettingham Rutherford IV said:
ask a mod?

Haha nah I wouldn't really do that. But I do feel that trying to figure out how involved or complacent the U.S. was in the attack is completely and utterly futile, and as a result, wasn't t my goal for the thread, but whatever.

  On 9/11/2011 at 6:42 AM, yikes said:

i could go on all night

but if the wool is over your eyes-enjoy the view

i wish i could bury my head in the sand too

 

anyone with a semblance of intellectual curiosity regardless of political alignment can't help but smell a fucking rotted rat

please dont talk down at us like we are all idiots

conspiracy enthusiasts have had 10 years to go mainstream and they have failed

your are mistaking opportunism for god-like ultimate-cabal-control of everything

you have to look at all the evidence, not just the bits you agree with

read some chomsky, see what he says about it.

Edited by zazen

i was in a "modern problems" class in highschool when the planes hit. we watched that modern problem unfold and didn't do shit else for the class. then i went to spanish and my teacher wouldn't even let us turn the tv on ... we just did vocab sheets. that teacher was a real shrew. i remember kids in the halls shouting "NUKE THEM!!!" and i was somewhat unsettled by that, but to be honest, my initial reaction was revenge as well (i was just quiet about it, as you'd expect an autechre fan to be)

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

GHOST: have you killed Claudius yet
HAMLET: no
GHOST: why
HAMLET: fuck you is why
im going to the cemetery to touch skulls

[planet of dinosaurs - the album [bc] [archive]]

Guest the anonymous forumite
  On 9/11/2011 at 6:06 PM, luke viia said:

my initial reaction was revenge as well (i was just quiet about it, as you'd expect an autechre fan to be)

 

CONFIELD THEM ALL !!!

 

As for me, I was going to do some laundry when my mum called me to let me know. I then turned the tv on, and went posting about it on the WARP forum.

It's hard to change the mind of others, but if this is your intention the absolute worst you can do is assume they are stupid. I guess you need to work really really hard on your empathy to unlock the common suffering that is right here with us*, oh and you need to speak their language, not yours.

 

The Science of Why We Don't Believe Science - How our brains fool us

http://m.motherjones...ce-chris-mooney

 

* just stole this from a DJ Sprinkle song : D

no youtube videos in the signature, lolz

 

much love,

squee

This is the kind of shit that the people I called stupid people say (from a facebook post today): "To say that this war is "unnecessary" is absurd to me, and furthermore, a huge insult to our military! Freedom comes with a price. Defending and protecting our country is necessary. Go thank a Veteran for your current freedom and right to say silly things!"

 

Seriously, brainwashed... It doesn't matter what I say to them. No evidence I can give/show impacts their thought process. They have their minds made up, they "know" they're right. I generally stay away from talking politics to people because I find it to be rather futile. Why waste my time trying to change other people? All I can control is myself, so I jbc and enjoy my life.

 

Also, this whole "you don't empathize w/ these other people" reply is unfounded. I understand where they're coming from, I just don't agree with it. Empathy != sympathy

Block their feed. I mostly refuse to talk politics in the real world and retread to my private tower but I imagine we could reach a point when you can no longer have such privilege / place to hide from these people. Then you will feel like a coward and lament you didn't do anything to change the situation when you could. It's your choice.

 

So... The upcoming watmm darkroom forum, Hulk Hogan pics and conspiracy theories mean that we have successfully reached farce territory in this thread so let me push just a little more in our project of mutual liberation with Karlheinz Stockhausen thoughts on 9/11

 

 

  Quote

In a press conference in Hamburg on 16 September 2001, Stockhausen was asked by a journalist whether the characters in Licht were for him "merely some figures out of a common cultural history" or rather "material appearances". The composer replied, "I pray daily to Michael, but not to Lucifer. I have renounced him. But he is very much present, like in New York recently" (Stockhausen 2002, 76). The same journalist then asked how the events of 11 September had affected him, and how he viewed reports of the attack in connection with the harmony of humanity represented in Hymnen. He answered:

 

Well, what happened there is, of course—now all of you must adjust your brains—the biggest work of art there has ever been. The fact that spirits achieve with one act something which we in music could never dream of, that people practise ten years madly, fanatically for a concert. And then die. [Hesitantly.] And that is the greatest work of art that exists for the whole Cosmos. Just imagine what happened there. There are people who are so concentrated on this single performance, and then five thousand people are driven to Resurrection. In one moment. I couldn't do that. Compared to that, we are nothing, as composers. [...] It is a crime, you know of course, because the people did not agree to it. They did not come to the "concert". That is obvious. And nobody had told them: "You could be killed in the process."

 

http://en.wikipedia....ptember_attacks

no youtube videos in the signature, lolz

 

much love,

squee

  On 9/11/2011 at 6:42 PM, hautlle said:

This is the kind of shit that the people I called stupid people say (from a facebook post today): "To say that this war is "unnecessary" is absurd to me, and furthermore, a huge insult to our military! Freedom comes with a price. Defending and protecting our country is necessary. Go thank a Veteran for your current freedom and right to say silly things!"

 

Seriously, brainwashed... It doesn't matter what I say to them. No evidence I can give/show impacts their thought process. They have their minds made up, they "know" they're right. I generally stay away from talking politics to people because I find it to be rather futile. Why waste my time trying to change other people? All I can control is myself, so I jbc and enjoy my life.

 

Also, this whole "you don't empathize w/ these other people" reply is unfounded. I understand where they're coming from, I just don't agree with it. Empathy != sympathy

 

 

You empathize with them whether you personally believe it or not. All American citizens, and to an extent the rest of the Westernized world, are in some form subjected to this propaganda. The reactions vary: Some attach themselves to the official line out of fear, and others strongly reject it. But very rarely, not really since Vietnam have a majority in either of these groups engaged themselves in open protest and conflict against it, in debate, in activism. Voting does not change anything. Voting is conceding to the system you mock and hate, and once again giving the mandate for people to act against your interest for another 4 years. The Tea Party can radicalize based upon psychological falsehoods, why the fuck isn't the reaction more powerful on the other side?

 

I would claim it is because of both intellectual apathy/laziness/fear in their own right, and also refusal to convey the argument properly to people that "just won't listen."

 

Here's an example, not the greatest example, but an example of what I mean nonetheless:

 

[youtubehd]SCNs7Zpqo98[/youtubehd]

 

 

There needs to be more of this. Much more of this. And it needs to be direct, and consistent. Stop veiling your want for unification in sarcasm and apathy.

 

 

btw, I am not advocating that Congress needs to be full of people like Al Franken.

 

The very fact that I am posting stuff like this and expect to get smacked around by everyone with witty retorts and blanket references to Teabaggers should be indicative of my refusal to let that tone dictate the policy and the attitude on both sides of our country.

 

 

Tea Partiers originally had decent, rational grievances, that even the most communist/anarchist could empathize with:

 

[youtubehd]mWs6g3L3fkU[/youtubehd]

  On 9/10/2011 at 11:34 PM, disparaissant said:

i got the dirtiest looks in this anthro class i am taking when the prof asked what makes an american an american and i said "an undeserved feeling of exceptionalism."

 

for me that's the definition of a patriot regardless of where they're from. but the evil looks you got kinda prove your point that many Americans are very attached to their silly patriotism.

 

  On 9/11/2011 at 4:03 AM, jefferoo said:

298400_10100560136947869_820414_59459850_1859557836_n.jpg

 

The 90's, good times!

  On 9/11/2011 at 7:12 PM, Terpentintollwut said:
  On 9/10/2011 at 11:34 PM, disparaissant said:

i got the dirtiest looks in this anthro class i am taking when the prof asked what makes an american an american and i said "an undeserved feeling of exceptionalism."

 

for me that's the definition of a patriot regardless of where they're from. but the evil looks you got kinda prove your point that many Americans are very attached to their silly patriotism.

 

  On 9/11/2011 at 4:03 AM, jefferoo said:

298400_10100560136947869_820414_59459850_1859557836_n.jpg

 

The 90's, good times!

 

Indeed. You can't really see, but I'm wearing fat, raver pants and the longest sweater I ever owned :emotawesomepm9:

 

 

  On 9/10/2011 at 6:49 PM, Smettingham Rutherford IV said:

I do remember feeling like a complete dick as it happened in class...some other kid stood up obviously shocked and said in the gayest voice imaginable,

 

 

" A 747? Oh my gawd that's like a freaking busplane."

 

At which point me and my friend fell out of our seats laughing.

 

Maybe I was eager to stop worrying about people I knew in that area. I dunno. Its so strange the emotions you can go through without your direct input/will ...hard to explain

 

 

This is something I can totally relate to.

 

I left it out of my long story because it embarrasses me to remember a moment I had when I was in the group of students watching the TV in the common room, blocks away from ground zero. I got worked up and started trying to convince my friends that we needed to quickly go out and find a news camera so that we could get in front of it and urge our leaders not to go to war over this event. I convinced one friend and the next friend I went up to was staring blankly at the tv screen with his mouth hanging open. I said something like "we need to find a camera and tell them not to go to war over this". My friend didn't respond and I think I kept talking (I've partially blocked this memory) and he turned to me and basically shut me down. I don't remember exactly what he said, but it was something to the effect of how I should stop because thousands of people just died and he couldn't do anything at all." I remember feeling like I lost control of myself. He definitely snapped me out of a bit of a frenzy I was in.

Looking back though, I think it's interesting that one of my first reactions was to try and stop our country from using it as an excuse to go to war. I was kinda right, but I feel like I was insensitive in that moment. I think about that moment a lot and the look on my friends face.

  On 9/11/2011 at 6:06 PM, zazen said:
  On 9/11/2011 at 6:42 AM, yikes said:

i could go on all night

but if the wool is over your eyes-enjoy the view

i wish i could bury my head in the sand too

 

anyone with a semblance of intellectual curiosity regardless of political alignment can't help but smell a fucking rotted rat

please dont talk down at us like we are all idiots

conspiracy enthusiasts have had 10 years to go mainstream and they have failed

your are mistaking opportunism for god-like ultimate-cabal-control of everything

you have to look at all the evidence, not just the bits you agree with

read some chomsky, see what he says about it.

 

thank you for this response, far more concise than i could have done.

I was a lurker at watmm or joyrex.com or whatever it was called back in 2001. I remember visiting the forum sometime soon after.

Drukqs had recently been released.

There was a thread entitled "Gwely Mernans - perfect soundtrack for these times", or something.

Edited by zazen
  On 9/11/2011 at 6:06 PM, zazen said:

conspiracy enthusiasts have had 10 years to go mainstream and they have failed

 

absolutely man, the same conspiracy theorists who called the Gulf of Tonkin a false flag, those dudes were totally not validated. There was only a 10 year clock on that and as soon as the 10 years was up it became totally irrelvent.

 

Same with that dude JFK remember him? Absolutely no one today talks about how it's a conspiracy and 20 years later a huge successful hollywood film by Oliver Stone never came out

 

so anybody still in here who has suspicions about what happened on 9/11, your time is up guys, 10 years has passed time to close up shop. nothing to see here, move along

Edited by Awepittance
  On 9/11/2011 at 6:06 PM, zazen said:

read some chomsky, see what he says about it.

 

right, you mean this Chomsky... (November 6, 2010)

  Quote

Renowned scholar Noam Chomsky says US invasion of Afghanistan was illegal since to date there is no evidence that al-Qaeda has carried out the 9/11 attacks.

“The explicit and declared motive of the [Afghanistan] war was to compel the Taliban to turn over to the United States, the people who they accused of having been involved in World Trade Center and Pentagon terrorist acts. The Taliban…they requested evidence…and the Bush administration refused to provide any,” the 81-year-old senior academic made the remarks on Press TV’s program
A Simple Question
.

“We later discovered one of the reasons why they did not bring evidence: they did not have any.”

The political analyst also said that nonexistence of such evidence was confirmed by FBI eight months later.

“The head of FBI, after the most intense international investigation in history, informed the press that the FBI believed that the plot may have been hatched in Afghanistan, but was probably implemented in the United Arab Emirates and Germany.”

 

Chomsky originally said that 9/11 alternate theories were 'taking vast energies from the left' maybe he was right, but he has come a long way since then. An academic like him can't ignore the overwhelming fact that there was no proof, and i commend him for that.

Edited by Awepittance

i didn't find out til september 14th

 

i was living in a tiny caravan in the forest south of amsterdam with no tv and no internet, and i was off sick from work.

i turned on AM talk radio the night of the 14th (one of the few english-language radio stations i could get). very much a wtf moment.

  On 5/7/2013 at 11:06 PM, ambermonk said:

I know IDM can be extreme

  On 6/3/2017 at 11:50 PM, ladalaika said:

this sounds like an airplane landing on a minefield

  On 9/12/2011 at 12:07 AM, xxx said:
  On 9/12/2011 at 12:02 AM, kaini said:

i didn't find out til september 14th

 

i was living in a tiny caravan in the forest south of amsterdam with no tv and no internet, and i was off sick from work.

i turned on AM talk radio the night of the 14th (one of the few english-language radio stations i could get). very much a wtf moment.

Shit, I wish I could go to that same forest right now...but not before a hash run in the city :emotawesomepm9:

 

10km mostly through the forest on a bike. all flat, naturally.

i used love living there.

  On 5/7/2013 at 11:06 PM, ambermonk said:

I know IDM can be extreme

  On 6/3/2017 at 11:50 PM, ladalaika said:

this sounds like an airplane landing on a minefield

  On 9/11/2011 at 10:46 PM, Awepittance said:
  On 9/11/2011 at 6:06 PM, zazen said:

read some chomsky, see what he says about it.

 

right, you mean this Chomsky... (November 6, 2010)

  Quote

Renowned scholar Noam Chomsky says US invasion of Afghanistan was illegal since to date there is no evidence that al-Qaeda has carried out the 9/11 attacks.

“The explicit and declared motive of the [Afghanistan] war was to compel the Taliban to turn over to the United States, the people who they accused of having been involved in World Trade Center and Pentagon terrorist acts. The Taliban…they requested evidence…and the Bush administration refused to provide any,” the 81-year-old senior academic made the remarks on Press TV’s program
A Simple Question
.

“We later discovered one of the reasons why they did not bring evidence: they did not have any.”

The political analyst also said that nonexistence of such evidence was confirmed by FBI eight months later.

“The head of FBI, after the most intense international investigation in history, informed the press that the FBI believed that the plot may have been hatched in Afghanistan, but was probably implemented in the United Arab Emirates and Germany.”

 

 

Yes, I absolutely mean that Chomsky (and what does pointing out that the Afghanistan invasion was illegal have to do with claims of 9-11 being an inside job?)

I'm down with what he has to say about JFK too

 

  Quote

http://books.zcommun...rc-c02-s14.html

 

A methodological point is perhaps worth mention. Suppose that we were to concoct a theory about historical events at random, while permitting ourselves to assume arbitrary forms of deceit and falsification. Then in the vast documentary record, we are sure to find scattered hints and other debris that could be made to conform to the theory, while counter-evidence is nullified. By that method, one can "prove" virtually anything. For example, we can prove that JFK never intended to withdraw any troops, citing the elusiveness of NSAM 263 and his unwillingness to commit himself to the withdrawal recommended by his war managers. Or we can prove that the attempt to assassinate Reagan was carried out by dark forces (Alexander Haig, the CIA, etc.). After all, Reagan had backed away from using US forces directly in Central America (unlike JFK in Vietnam); he was cozying up to the Chicoms; he had already given intimations of the anti-nuclear passion that led him to offer to give away the store at Rejkjavik and to join forces with the arch-fiend Gorbachev, whose perestroika was a transparent plot to entrap us; his associates were planning off-the-shelf international operations, bypassing intelligence and the Pentagon. Obviously, he has to go. Or suppose there had been an attempt to assassinate LBJ in late 1964, when he was refusing the call of the military to stand up to the Commies in Vietnam, pursuing Great Society and civil rights programs with a zeal well beyond Kennedy, and about to defeat a real alternative, Barry Goldwater. Nothing is easier than to construct a high-level conspiracy to get rid of this "radical reformer." The task is only facilitated by a search for nuances and variations of phrasing in the mountains of documents, usually committee jobs put together hastily with many compromises.

This is not the way to learn about the world.

Edited by zazen
  On 9/12/2011 at 12:20 AM, kaini said:
  On 9/12/2011 at 12:07 AM, xxx said:
  On 9/12/2011 at 12:02 AM, kaini said:

i didn't find out til september 14th

 

i was living in a tiny caravan in the forest south of amsterdam with no tv and no internet, and i was off sick from work.

i turned on AM talk radio the night of the 14th (one of the few english-language radio stations i could get). very much a wtf moment.

Shit, I wish I could go to that same forest right now...but not before a hash run in the city :emotawesomepm9:

 

10km mostly through the forest on a bike. all flat, naturally.

i used love living there.

well there's one hill, avoid the hill (slope thing)

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 Member

×
×