Jump to content
IGNORED

Anonymous are apparently going to kill facebook on Saturday


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Since they can't take on the Zetas in Mexico, I guess they have to troll something to prove they're still relevant...

WATMM-Records-Signature-Banner-500x80.jpg

 

Follow WATMM on Twitter: @WATMMOfficial

they aren't relevant cause it's been a few months since they've been in the news?

 

jesus fucking christ.

  On 8/19/2011 at 11:51 PM, Luke Fucking Hazard said:

Essines has, and always will remind me of MacReady.

  On 11/3/2011 at 6:57 PM, essines said:

they aren't relevant cause it's been a few months since they've been in the news?

 

jesus fucking christ.

 

No, bellend - they're less relevant since they threatened to expose the Zetas' internal police and government contacts, and the Zetas basically made them back down - hardly the invincible hacker group they thought they were, so (now pay attention, this is where it gets complicated) my statement about them having to attack Farcebook is basically there way of reasserting their perceived dominance in the online-terrorism circles and to the rest of the world.

 

And the whole Zetas thing was this past week - hardly "a few months". Doesn't news filter up there? Did you get Maple syrup or a beaver tail lodged in your DSL modem? :emotawesomepm9:

WATMM-Records-Signature-Banner-500x80.jpg

 

Follow WATMM on Twitter: @WATMMOfficial

  On 11/3/2011 at 6:56 PM, Joyrex said:

Since they can't take on the Zetas in Mexico, I guess they have to troll something to prove they're still relevant...

 

Yeah, considering that I've reports pertaining that Anonymous would attack the Mexican drug cartel, Fox News and Facebook on November 5th I have a feeling that they will not successfully effect any of them.

 

Sounds like Anonymous is so anonymous and fragmented that they can't even plan what to do.

  On 11/3/2011 at 7:03 PM, Joyrex said:
  On 11/3/2011 at 6:57 PM, essines said:

they aren't relevant cause it's been a few months since they've been in the news?

 

jesus fucking christ.

 

No, bellend - they're less relevant since they threatened to expose the Zetas' internal police and government contacts, and the Zetas basically made them back down - hardly the invincible hacker group they thought they were, so (now pay attention, this is where it gets complicated) my statement about them having to attack Farcebook is basically there way of reasserting their perceived dominance in the online-terrorism circles and to the rest of the world.

 

And the whole Zetas thing was this past week - hardly "a few months". Doesn't news filter up there? Did you get Maple syrup or a beaver tail lodged in your DSL modem? :emotawesomepm9:

 

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2395812,00.asp#fbid=XDV7uE2s6M7

 

dude posted the vid yesterday, so this is still supposedly happening.

  On 11/3/2011 at 7:03 PM, Joyrex said:
  On 11/3/2011 at 6:57 PM, essines said:

they aren't relevant cause it's been a few months since they've been in the news?

 

jesus fucking christ.

 

No, bellend - they're less relevant since they threatened to expose the Zetas' internal police and government contacts, and the Zetas basically made them back down - hardly the invincible hacker group they thought they were, so (now pay attention, this is where it gets complicated) my statement about them having to attack Farcebook is basically there way of reasserting their perceived dominance in the online-terrorism circles and to the rest of the world.

 

And the whole Zetas thing was this past week - hardly "a few months". Doesn't news filter up there? Did you get Maple syrup or a beaver tail lodged in your DSL modem? :emotawesomepm9:

Didn't hear shit about the Zetas but i still don't understand why you say they are irrelevant. Thanks for insulting me though.

  On 8/19/2011 at 11:51 PM, Luke Fucking Hazard said:

Essines has, and always will remind me of MacReady.

  On 11/3/2011 at 7:11 PM, Gary C said:
  On 11/3/2011 at 6:56 PM, Joyrex said:

Since they can't take on the Zetas in Mexico, I guess they have to troll something to prove they're still relevant...

 

Yeah, considering that I've reports pertaining that Anonymous would attack the Mexican drug cartel, Fox News and Facebook on November 5th I have a feeling that they will not successfully effect any of them.

 

Sounds like Anonymous is so anonymous and fragmented that they can't even plan what to do.

 

They supposedly called off the attack on the Zetas - are you saying it's back on now?

WATMM-Records-Signature-Banner-500x80.jpg

 

Follow WATMM on Twitter: @WATMMOfficial

  On 11/3/2011 at 7:13 PM, essines said:
  On 11/3/2011 at 7:03 PM, Joyrex said:
  On 11/3/2011 at 6:57 PM, essines said:

they aren't relevant cause it's been a few months since they've been in the news?

 

jesus fucking christ.

 

No, bellend - they're less relevant since they threatened to expose the Zetas' internal police and government contacts, and the Zetas basically made them back down - hardly the invincible hacker group they thought they were, so (now pay attention, this is where it gets complicated) my statement about them having to attack Farcebook is basically there way of reasserting their perceived dominance in the online-terrorism circles and to the rest of the world.

 

And the whole Zetas thing was this past week - hardly "a few months". Doesn't news filter up there? Did you get Maple syrup or a beaver tail lodged in your DSL modem? :emotawesomepm9:

Didn't hear shit about the Zetas but i still don't understand why you say they are irrelevant. Thanks for insulting me though.

 

Well, don't you think you deserved it just a teeny bit after your "OMFG JOYREX HOW DARE YOU INSULT ANONYMMMUS TEH ELETE HAXORS OF DE WURLD JEEBUS FARKING KEERYEST!!!" comment?

 

  On 11/3/2011 at 7:15 PM, couch said:

Why they hatin on facebook.

 

I think taking down Farcebook is akin to the kiddie porn website ring they took down recently... a public service, really.

WATMM-Records-Signature-Banner-500x80.jpg

 

Follow WATMM on Twitter: @WATMMOfficial

If that is how you read my post then you're just being a child. You frustrated me so i said "jesus fucking christ". For all I care anonymous and everyone involved could be dead.

 

Stop it.

  On 8/19/2011 at 11:51 PM, Luke Fucking Hazard said:

Essines has, and always will remind me of MacReady.

  On 11/3/2011 at 7:14 PM, Joyrex said:
  On 11/3/2011 at 7:11 PM, Gary C said:
  On 11/3/2011 at 6:56 PM, Joyrex said:

Since they can't take on the Zetas in Mexico, I guess they have to troll something to prove they're still relevant...

 

Yeah, considering that I've reports pertaining that Anonymous would attack the Mexican drug cartel, Fox News and Facebook on November 5th I have a feeling that they will not successfully effect any of them.

 

Sounds like Anonymous is so anonymous and fragmented that they can't even plan what to do.

 

They supposedly called off the attack on the Zetas - are you saying it's back on now?

 

No, I read today that it was off too. And rightly so, they're fucking with genuinely dangerous men with Mexican drug dealers, not just faceless corporations.

 

But over the last 2 weeks I've read of 3 different targets on Nov 5th. And most proclamations have come from different channels. Maybe their communication portals get shut down frequently, but it's more likely that there are too many different controllers and ideas within Anonymous.

  On 11/3/2011 at 7:22 PM, Gary C said:
  On 11/3/2011 at 7:14 PM, Joyrex said:
  On 11/3/2011 at 7:11 PM, Gary C said:
  On 11/3/2011 at 6:56 PM, Joyrex said:

Since they can't take on the Zetas in Mexico, I guess they have to troll something to prove they're still relevant...

 

Yeah, considering that I've reports pertaining that Anonymous would attack the Mexican drug cartel, Fox News and Facebook on November 5th I have a feeling that they will not successfully effect any of them.

 

Sounds like Anonymous is so anonymous and fragmented that they can't even plan what to do.

 

They supposedly called off the attack on the Zetas - are you saying it's back on now?

 

No, I read today that it was off too. And rightly so, they're fucking with genuinely dangerous men with Mexican drug dealers, not just faceless corporations.

 

But over the last 2 weeks I've read of 3 different targets on Nov 5th. And most proclamations have come from different channels. Maybe their communication portals get shut down frequently, but it's more likely that there are too many different controllers and ideas within Anonymous.

 

Ah, I see. Perhaps if they organized better, in some sort of hierarchical structure... oh, wait...

WATMM-Records-Signature-Banner-500x80.jpg

 

Follow WATMM on Twitter: @WATMMOfficial

  On 11/3/2011 at 7:20 PM, Joyrex said:

Wait - I frustrated YOU and you're saying I'M being childish?

 

LOL to that!

please explain? i'm just saying i wasn't name calling, and not resorting to childish tactics? adults still curse in frustration or am i missing something? or am i not allowed to become frustrated? you could have just let me know that the zeta thing was in the news and that i was mis- or un- informed but instead you started mocking me. i don't get it.

Edited by essines
  On 8/19/2011 at 11:51 PM, Luke Fucking Hazard said:

Essines has, and always will remind me of MacReady.

Let's not be coy here - you laid down the attitude (frustrated by my statement or not), and you didn't expect a similar reaction?

 

Had you made your point clearer, I probably wouldn't have responded with such vitriol. Sorry about that.

WATMM-Records-Signature-Banner-500x80.jpg

 

Follow WATMM on Twitter: @WATMMOfficial

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 Member

×
×