Anonymous are apparently going to kill facebook on Saturday

  On 11/3/2011 at 7:03 PM, Joyrex said:

  On 11/3/2011 at 6:57 PM, essines said:

they aren't relevant cause it's been a few months since they've been in the news?

 

jesus fucking christ.

 

No, bellend - they're less relevant since they threatened to expose the Zetas' internal police and government contacts, and the Zetas basically made them back down - hardly the invincible hacker group they thought they were, so (now pay attention, this is where it gets complicated) my statement about them having to attack Farcebook is basically there way of reasserting their perceived dominance in the online-terrorism circles and to the rest of the world.

 

And the whole Zetas thing was this past week - hardly "a few months". Doesn't news filter up there? Did you get Maple syrup or a beaver tail lodged in your DSL modem?

wut? i never heard about it.

besides anything involving anonymous and someone reporting their plans is dubious since hardly anyone in the mainstream media understands what anonymous is.

  On 11/3/2011 at 7:31 PM, GORDO said:

  On 11/3/2011 at 7:03 PM, Joyrex said:

  On 11/3/2011 at 6:57 PM, essines said:

they aren't relevant cause it's been a few months since they've been in the news?

 

jesus fucking christ.

 

No, bellend - they're less relevant since they threatened to expose the Zetas' internal police and government contacts, and the Zetas basically made them back down - hardly the invincible hacker group they thought they were, so (now pay attention, this is where it gets complicated) my statement about them having to attack Farcebook is basically there way of reasserting their perceived dominance in the online-terrorism circles and to the rest of the world.

 

And the whole Zetas thing was this past week - hardly "a few months". Doesn't news filter up there? Did you get Maple syrup or a beaver tail lodged in your DSL modem?

 

 

wut? i never heard about it.

 

besides anything involving anonymous and someone reporting their plans is dubious since hardly anyone in the mainstream media understands what anonymous is.

yeah, apparently one of their members was kidnapped in Mexico and in retaliation, they threatened to expose all the Zetas' government and police contacts (which is just about everyone in Mexican municipal/government service these days), then they mysteriously 'called off' their attack. Shit probably got real on their end when their buddy's cajones were FedExed to some Anon higher up.

faceblech

read a bit about it now, but "anonymous" in mexico is a joke, just a bunch of kids jumping on the bandwagon. their biggest victory so far is taking down a couple websites than no one visited anyway.

usually saying things like "pay attention, this is complicated" on a message board gets you some dick points. i think the idea is that essines was sarcastic, as he sometimes appears to be

  On 11/3/2011 at 7:28 PM, Joyrex said:

Let's not be coy here - you laid down the attitude (frustrated by my statement or not), and you didn't expect a similar reaction?

 

Had you made your point clearer, I probably wouldn't have responded with such vitriol. Sorry about that.

*adds to arsenal*

  On 11/3/2011 at 7:00 PM, Rubin Farr said:

kill scientology, faceblech and zetas

Mexicans don't mess!

and they didn't retreat apparently.

http://www.gustavorosario.com/

If I recall correctly, Anonymous just shut down several large child pornography sites and revealed all of their members to the public just last month. It sounds to me like they've been keeping busy: http://www.forbes.com/sites/mobiledia/2011/10/25/hackers-attack-child-porn-sites/

Also, does anyone stop reading a post as soon as it becomes all caps and contains two consecutive spelling errors?

I miss lulzsec, they were more fun. They also had funnier ASCII artwork, and didn't muck around.

  On 11/3/2011 at 6:56 PM, Joyrex said:

Since they can't take on the Zetas in Mexico, I guess they have to troll something to prove they're still relevant...

"Anonymous" in one operation aren't necessarily the same Anon members in another operation. it's a name anyone can take and use. it's not like their demands, tactics, motivation and goals have to be consistent.

Bring it on.

joyrex and comedy are like my granddad and technology, incompatible

joyrex called essnies a beaver tail so i just proofed you wrong by contraction :sup:

argh

  On 11/3/2011 at 7:35 PM, Joyrex said:

  On 11/3/2011 at 7:31 PM, GORDO said:

  On 11/3/2011 at 7:03 PM, Joyrex said:

  On 11/3/2011 at 6:57 PM, essines said:

they aren't relevant cause it's been a few months since they've been in the news?

 

jesus fucking christ.

 

No, bellend - they're less relevant since they threatened to expose the Zetas' internal police and government contacts, and the Zetas basically made them back down - hardly the invincible hacker group they thought they were, so (now pay attention, this is where it gets complicated) my statement about them having to attack Farcebook is basically there way of reasserting their perceived dominance in the online-terrorism circles and to the rest of the world.

 

And the whole Zetas thing was this past week - hardly "a few months". Doesn't news filter up there? Did you get Maple syrup or a beaver tail lodged in your DSL modem?

 

 

wut? i never heard about it.

 

besides anything involving anonymous and someone reporting their plans is dubious since hardly anyone in the mainstream media understands what anonymous is.

 

yeah, apparently one of their members was kidnapped in Mexico and in retaliation, they threatened to expose all the Zetas' government and police contacts (which is just about everyone in Mexican municipal/government service these days), then they mysteriously 'called off' their attack. Shit probably got real on their end when their buddy's cajones were FedExed to some Anon higher up.

Los Zetas threatened to hire hackers to backtrace Anonymous members and kill them, hence why they backed out.

http://www.guardian....n?newsfeed=true

  On 11/3/2011 at 7:35 PM, Joyrex said:

  On 11/3/2011 at 7:31 PM, GORDO said:

  On 11/3/2011 at 7:03 PM, Joyrex said:

  On 11/3/2011 at 6:57 PM, essines said:

they aren't relevant cause it's been a few months since they've been in the news?

 

jesus fucking christ.

 

No, bellend - they're less relevant since they threatened to expose the Zetas' internal police and government contacts, and the Zetas basically made them back down - hardly the invincible hacker group they thought they were, so (now pay attention, this is where it gets complicated) my statement about them having to attack Farcebook is basically there way of reasserting their perceived dominance in the online-terrorism circles and to the rest of the world.

 

And the whole Zetas thing was this past week - hardly "a few months". Doesn't news filter up there? Did you get Maple syrup or a beaver tail lodged in your DSL modem?

 

 

wut? i never heard about it.

 

besides anything involving anonymous and someone reporting their plans is dubious since hardly anyone in the mainstream media understands what anonymous is.

 

yeah, apparently one of their members was kidnapped in Mexico and in retaliation, they threatened to expose all the Zetas' government and police contacts (which is just about everyone in Mexican municipal/government service these days), then they mysteriously 'called off' their attack. Shit probably got real on their end when their buddy's cajones were FedExed to some Anon higher up.

They FedExed some wooden boxes to Anon?

The Greys are behind the Mexican drug cartel?

popcorn.gif

lol that gif never gets old for me

bellend?

the glans

  On 11/4/2011 at 2:59 AM, qnio said:

bellend?

read the rules