The Michael Jackson Verdict

  On 11/6/2011 at 6:58 PM, sup said:

"the kid is not my son"

"he's actually my lover"

the pepsi commercial incident was the beginning of the end. there were other major changes within him it seemed, between late 1980's and the mid 90's.

i would say that persistent family and life based trauma, combined with prescription drugs and prescription drug abuse took it's toll on a very sensitive man who was already very confused.

what an amazing performer, not the bit confused when it came to this. i don't think anyone can dispute the fact that musically, michael jackson has changed things forever

He definitely had some very good songwriters and producers at his disposal his entire life.

yeah he widely influenced rnb and pop music

= fuck rnb and pop music. RIGHT?!

  On 11/6/2011 at 11:24 PM, yek said:

= fuck rnb and pop music. RIGHT?!

Guilty muthafucka! now back to the Herman Cain show already in progress.

  On 11/6/2011 at 6:58 PM, sup said:

to all the ppl saying mj is a pedo i think your just all jealous of mjs success as a music artist and coolness

 

i can proove mj was not a pedo just listen to his song BILLIE JEAN which is about a lady who says her son is mjs son. in it mj says shes not his lover and "the kid is not my son" now if mj was a pedo he would WANT the kid to be his son (even if its not) so he could get close as a father and do pedo stuff to it. but cuz he says cuz its not his son he cant be a pedo QED mofos

"March 2, 2002 -- According to the grand jury report, a graduate assistant allegedly tells Coach Joe Paterno that he saw Sandusky in the locker room shower the night before, performing anal sex on a young boy he estimated to be 10 years old."

It would have been so much cooler if I didn't have to know about this involuntary manslaughter case just as it is with every single other involuntary manslaughter case.

  On 11/6/2011 at 4:14 AM, Z_B_Z said:

@lump

 

just various accounts of staff that worked for him combined with what is already public knowledge.. i cant think of anything specific at the moment because its been a while since ive read/seen the stuff. very little of what ive read has just straight up declared him a pedophile... i suppose i could be wrong, and i hope i am, although i dont think so. this book especially has a bunch of stuff in it. it was long as fuck, and the author does a good job of remaining impartial..

 

 

lately ive been thinking of rereading at least parts of it... good book

i have not been convinced

so what?