Jump to content
IGNORED

more art: atelier olschinsky


Recommended Posts

not that i dig gursky that much - and i do LIKE those drawings (?) you posted there - but HOW can you say that this is art when it's obviously so clichéd, derivative and gimmicky and at the same time call gursky "art", with big fat moron doublequotes as in "oh big fuckin deal, i can take better pictures of the rhine any day". watmms taste in art is so fucking prehistoric it hurts.

lol at you getting all artfag precious about some quotes when you basically agree with me. i don't represent "watmm's taste" btw, only my own. i haven't suggested they are highly conceptual or particularly deep or thought provoking, i just like the aesthetics of them. and they are more than just drawings are they not? i take it you're pretty young and haven't realised different strokes yet? that boring photo does absolutely nothing for me whereas i'd happily have these £90 prints on my wall and admire them daily.

 

basically, it's art cos i said it is and it's "art" cos i said it is. how about that?

jjbms1.jpg

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

you can stroke whatever pleases you. now in this particular area (for me) you do represent watmm. everyone here is always on the lookout for that cutting edge ultra-weirdo "OMG what are you listening to, that sounds like a MATRIX"-electronica but if it comes to painting and photography you all (sorry for generalizing, i know there are exceptions) sound like my grandma (or sup). i basically agree with you insofar that these pictures are "nice to look at". an ikea catalogue is also nice to look at.

  On 11/11/2011 at 5:33 PM, marian said:

everyone here is always on the lookout for that cutting edge ultra-weirdo "OMG what are you listening to, that sounds like a MATRIX"-electronica

 

 

lol of the day for me.

  On 11/11/2011 at 6:47 PM, sup said:

i am your grandma

 

lol

 

:wtf:

GHOST: have you killed Claudius yet
HAMLET: no
GHOST: why
HAMLET: fuck you is why
im going to the cemetery to touch skulls

[planet of dinosaurs - the album [bc] [archive]]

  On 11/11/2011 at 5:33 PM, marian said:

you can stroke whatever pleases you. now in this particular area (for me) you do represent watmm. everyone here is always on the lookout for that cutting edge ultra-weirdo "OMG what are you listening to, that sounds like a MATRIX"-electronica but if it comes to painting and photography you all (sorry for generalizing, i know there are exceptions) sound like my grandma (or sup). i basically agree with you insofar that these pictures are "nice to look at". an ikea catalogue is also nice to look at.

 

Deftly, the troll sets her bait, waiting for the forum denizens to be ensnared in its obvious clutches.

  On 11/11/2011 at 9:18 PM, triachus said:

oh come on now

 

 

we're all fags underneath

 

 

grouphug

hell yeah

Some songs I made with my fingers and electronics. In the process of making some more. Hopefully.

 

  Reveal hidden contents

this art reminds me from the level in sonic cd where all the ground is bouncy and theres all this beams and grids u need to not hit

  On 11/11/2011 at 5:33 PM, marian said:

you can stroke whatever pleases you. now in this particular area (for me) you do represent watmm. everyone here is always on the lookout for that cutting edge ultra-weirdo "OMG what are you listening to, that sounds like a MATRIX"-electronica but if it comes to painting and photography you all (sorry for generalizing, i know there are exceptions) sound like my grandma (or sup). i basically agree with you insofar that these pictures are "nice to look at". an ikea catalogue is also nice to look at.

 

The problem with this is that back in the time your grandma was your age, there were people around that would have liked the art that you consider cutting edge now. Does that make that art timeless then? Or perhaps it helps define a subspecies of human that will always like things because they are considered 'cutting edge'.

 

I understand that art can be lumped into that monstrous ever cycling and recycling machine called fashion. So be careful that you don't latch on too tightly to the cutting edge of today, as you'll be discarded by tomorrow's hipsters before you know what happened. Therefore, just go for something that is aesthetically pleasing, not something that appears conceptually novel to your as yet less than cynical eyes . Be it an ikea catalogue or an highly detailed piece of hard work line drawing cityscape.

 

  On 11/11/2011 at 7:11 PM, patternoverlap said:
  On 11/11/2011 at 5:33 PM, marian said:

you can stroke whatever pleases you. now in this particular area (for me) you do represent watmm. everyone here is always on the lookout for that cutting edge ultra-weirdo "OMG what are you listening to, that sounds like a MATRIX"-electronica but if it comes to painting and photography you all (sorry for generalizing, i know there are exceptions) sound like my grandma (or sup). i basically agree with you insofar that these pictures are "nice to look at". an ikea catalogue is also nice to look at.

 

Deftly, the troll sets her bait, waiting for the forum denizens to be ensnared in its obvious clutches.

 

i couldn't wait to dive in. ;-]

 

  On 11/11/2011 at 9:18 PM, triachus said:

oh come on now

 

 

we're all artfags underneath

 

 

grouphug

 

totally, that's why we're here having this conversation. hah !! /hugs

A member of the non sequitairiate.

my favorite art is Bruegel cause its just at that line of detailed oil painting, anything before hasn't really grasped depth of field, but its old enough to make me feel like Im looking at an ancient photo

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 Member

×
×