The "Nano-Ear", So Sensitive It Is Capable Of "Listening" To Bacteria

just imagine the nulls you'd be able to detect with one of those things!

not to mention the voids!

since the telecommunications act of 1996, it became federally mandated that all cellphones become equip to allow agencies to tap into the microphone to record and listen to all incoming audio signals, even when the phone is turned off

now if they were really serious about hearing everything, they would put miniature listening devices in all popular electronic devices, and the technology would be so good that no one would even notice. weve already been through this now with laptops and digital tv cable boxes. even if your self-defenseless enough not to care, what do you think they had in mind when they started developing and implementing these technologies into our products? not milk and cookies, thats for damn sure

http://news.cnet.com...41-5111637.html

http://law.unh.edu/risk/vol8/fall/ramesh.htm

Troon, that article is 9 years old.

ET, fuck off.

oh' that's right, you weren't even born yet

Good one. The second link you posted is from before the turn of the millenium.

Fox News.

Am I the only person in this entire thread that knows how to discern sources of reliable information? Or even just read beyond the headlines?

Elaborate, please?

Well, let's see what else Fox News asked Ron Paul recently:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yp-3JVDszfY

So, uh, in short... let's not cite Fox News as a credible news source, ever, for anything, ever again. Thank you.

I don't support Ron Paul (or any of the other politicians). But chip implementation isn't just an old issue.

It's also not what this thread is about.

Indeed.

luke shut your little fucking mouth right now. the conversation isnt even about fox news - its clearly about ron paul, and even if it was about fox, it has long since been the consensus that fox news is bullshit. dont sit here and artificially steer the entire conversation (for what, the 3rd time today?) into some delusional conflict of debate. your just fucking shit up, trolling the shit out of me today, and just generally being a douche bag. dont think i didnt notice you not respond to my post regarding the telecommunications act of 96. where as with posts, i speak the word departicilization and you flip your shit and have a ego-maniacal hoedown for the all kids who dont know the difference. dont even grow up. just get the fuck out of here

Sure, you're right, why not, down with new technology, etc etc.

*bans self*

cant we use this technology to get a proper recording of the manchester track?

But can it hear aids?

I bet a ripe coffin sounds like one hell of a party.

what? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2000_problem