does anybody else feel like something is going on?

  On 1/20/2012 at 11:38 PM, THIS IS MICHAEL JACKSON said:

idiocracy is meant to be stupid because it's about a stupid yet possible future

 

i'm saying the premise of the movie is stupid. the future it envisions is not possible.

how is it not possible, it is happening AWS!!!

a 47 page thread about skrillex

idiocracy was brilliant, you simply miss another layer

  On 1/20/2012 at 11:39 PM, Hoodie said:

  On 1/20/2012 at 11:38 PM, THIS IS MICHAEL JACKSON said:

idiocracy is meant to be stupid because it's about a stupid yet possible future

 

i'm saying the premise of the movie is stupid. the future it envisions is not possible.

welcome to costco, i love you!

  On 1/20/2012 at 11:50 PM, eugene said:

idiocracy was brilliant, you simply miss another layer

 

what layer am i missing?

 

i'm just saying that the lack of intelligence associated with lower classes is probably a result of growing up in a shitty environment rather than inherent unintelligence.

i don't think the film was implying that actually, where did you get that notion from ? what scene ?

Edited January 20, 2012 by eugene

  On 1/20/2012 at 11:56 PM, Hoodie said:

  On 1/20/2012 at 11:50 PM, eugene said:

idiocracy was brilliant, you simply miss another layer

 

what layer am i missing?

 

i'm just saying that the lack of intelligence associated with lower classes is probably a result of growing up in a shitty environment rather than inherent unintelligence.

the movie is not about the causes yet about the results

  On 1/20/2012 at 11:59 PM, eugene said:

i don't think the film was implying that actually, where did you get that notion from ? what scene ?

 

are you trying to troll me?

 

[youtubehd]BXRjmyJFzrU[/youtubehd]

  On 1/20/2012 at 11:59 PM, eugene said:

i don't think the film was implying that actually, where did you get that notion from ? what scene ?

even if it did, the movie was not trying to be inteligent funding all it's facts in science... i don't get the people who watch this movie and start spitting shit like, this makes no sense whatoever... jeez, are we there yet?? i don't believe so...

Here's the thing, stupid people are not destroying the world, they are not the ones making nuclear bombs and crashing the economy on purpose.

  On 1/21/2012 at 12:01 AM, Hoodie said:

  On 1/20/2012 at 11:59 PM, eugene said:

i don't think the film was implying that actually, where did you get that notion from ? what scene ?

 

are you trying to troll me?

 

[youtubehd]BXRjmyJFzrU[/youtubehd]

it takes a slight bit of narrow mind to actually dislike this movie because of that

 

  On 1/21/2012 at 12:05 AM, YO303 said:

Here's the thing, stupid people are not destroying the world, they are not the ones making nuclear bombs and crashing the economy on purpose.

stupid people believe that all those things are normal, like people starving in africa, it's a normal thing, it happens since the begginings of time....

 

stupid people think we can't live without money, and if someone tells them so, it won't make any sense

 

 

PLUS, stupid people only UNITE for stupid CAUSES

Edited January 21, 2012 by THIS IS MICHAEL JACKSON

  On 1/21/2012 at 12:01 AM, Hoodie said:

  On 1/20/2012 at 11:59 PM, eugene said:

i don't think the film was implying that actually, where did you get that notion from ? what scene ?

 

are you trying to troll me?

 

[youtubehd]BXRjmyJFzrU[/youtubehd]

nah im not trolling, i suspected that you had this scene in mind, but to assume that he implies that stupidity is genetically transmitted is underestimating judge. he shows the parents' lifestyle after all.

Edited January 21, 2012 by eugene

class wars

 

edit: nah

Edited January 21, 2012 by tauboo

oh my how pretentious was this director/writer trying to make us all believe that stupidity is genetically transfered, does this guy believes i'm stupid enough to watch the rest of this movie

  On 1/21/2012 at 12:05 AM, YO303 said:

Here's the thing, stupid people are not destroying the world, they are not the ones making nuclear bombs and crashing the economy on purpose.

 

On the other hand, making nuclear bombs and destroying the world etc. is pretty stupid.

  On 1/21/2012 at 12:02 AM, THIS IS MICHAEL JACKSON said:

  On 1/20/2012 at 11:59 PM, eugene said:

i don't think the film was implying that actually, where did you get that notion from ? what scene ?

even if it did, the movie was not trying to be inteligent funding all it's facts in science... i don't get the people who watch this movie and start spitting shit like, this makes no sense whatoever... jeez, are we there yet?? i don't believe so...

i actually think it's very smart of him (if it was intentional, lol) to make that movie feel kinda stupid, it's like he wants to fuck with you, to present stupidity as attractive somehow. it reminds me of starship troopers in that way, where verhoeven makes you care for his fascist protagonists.

  On 1/21/2012 at 12:08 AM, eugene said:

  On 1/21/2012 at 12:01 AM, Hoodie said:

  On 1/20/2012 at 11:59 PM, eugene said:

i don't think the film was implying that actually, where did you get that notion from ? what scene ?

 

are you trying to troll me?

 

[youtubehd]BXRjmyJFzrU[/youtubehd]

nah im not trolling, i suspected that you had this scene in mind, but to assume that he implies that stupidity is genetically transmitted is underestimating judge. he shows the parents' lifestyle after all.

 

but if intelligence isn't genetically transmitted in the movie, then why does judge invoke evolutionary theory in the beginning of the movie? why would, then, the fact that stupid/poor people have more children and rich/smart people have less children be relevant at all to society being dumbed down if he wasn't referring to genetics?

 

please explain this movie to me.

stop your intelectual trolling hoodie

Edited January 21, 2012 by THIS IS MICHAEL JACKSON

  On 1/21/2012 at 12:15 AM, THIS IS MICHAEL JACKSON said:

stop your intelectual trolling hoodie

 

ok, max.

  On 1/21/2012 at 12:13 AM, HoA said:

  On 1/21/2012 at 12:05 AM, YO303 said:

Here's the thing, stupid people are not destroying the world, they are not the ones making nuclear bombs and crashing the economy on purpose.

 

On the other hand, making nuclear bombs and destroying the world etc. is pretty stupid.

 

it is, but its calculated stupidity.

so we have stupid people, and on the other hand we have stupid people with calculators

Edited January 21, 2012 by THIS IS MICHAEL JACKSON

  On 1/21/2012 at 12:17 AM, THIS IS MICHAEL JACKSON said:

so we have stupid people, and on the other hand we have stupid people with calculators

 

no, in the other hand we have smart people that do stupid things on purpose to help their cause.

  On 1/21/2012 at 12:19 AM, YO303 said:

  On 1/21/2012 at 12:17 AM, THIS IS MICHAEL JACKSON said:

so we have stupid people, and on the other hand we have stupid people with calculators

 

no, in the other hand we have smart people that do stupid things on purpose to help their cause.

those are the "stupid ones with a calculator"

 

jeez, why so serious

lol i know you were making a joke, i was just trying to expand my nonsense ideas better