chatmm slows down watmm

dunno if this is actually the case but could it be?

is it merely coincidence that ever since the resurrection of chatmm, watmm is painfully slow?

things seem to run fine when there's noone in chatmm, but like now, there is 11 people there and i'm finding it reaaaalllly fuuuuckkin annoyingly slow.

fine here.

fine here too.

fuuuuuuuuuuuu!

it's intermittent for me. but when it's slow i always seem to glance up to find chatmm busy.

chatmm is soggy

chatmm mucus is glueing up the gears at watmm hq.

seems to be the case here, too. it's taking longer to load pages, for sure.

didn't all the chatters develop a perfectly fine chat room of their very own anyway...??

  On 4/19/2012 at 4:51 PM, kaini said:

fine here.

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:09 PM, sirch said:

seems to be the case here, too. it's taking longer to load pages, for sure.

 

didn't all the chatters develop a perfectly fine chat room of their very own anyway...??

must be something wrong with your computers/internet then? it's fine here

also, nope. there is an IRC chat room, but because hardly anyone knows how to access IRC, most of the regulars who were in chatmm don't show up in the IRC chat room.

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:11 PM, oscillik said:

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:09 PM, sirch said:

seems to be the case here, too. it's taking longer to load pages, for sure.

 

didn't all the chatters develop a perfectly fine chat room of their very own anyway...??

 

must be something wrong with your computers/internet then? it's fine here

 

also, nope. there is an IRC chat room, but because hardly anyone knows how to access IRC, most of the regulars who were in chatmm don't show up in the IRC chat room.

nothing wrong with my computer or other websites. it's only watmm that seems slower. only by a few seconds, but still.

nothing wrong with my pc or internets either how dare you.

Fine here.

a thread just took approx 5 seconds to load. every other site i have been on today has been lightening quick.

Fine here.

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:23 PM, keltoi said:

nothing wrong with my pc or internets either how dare you.

I'm not trying to be a cock here.

How do you know there's nothing wrong with your PC or your internets? Are you working for your ISP, and are able to perform network tests to ascertain this?

Out of 7 unique posters here, only 2 of them have issues. That leads more to suggest that there is a problem with equipment/connections at your end, rather than a problem with WATMM.

but i guess everyone's an expert on watmm...

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:35 PM, oscillik said:

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:23 PM, keltoi said:

nothing wrong with my pc or internets either how dare you.

 

I'm not trying to be a cock here.

 

How do you know there's nothing wrong with your PC or your internets? Are you working for your ISP, and are able to perform network tests to ascertain this?

 

Out of 7 unique posters here, only 2 of them have issues. That leads more to suggest that there is a problem with equipment/connections at your end, rather than a problem with WATMM.

 

but i guess everyone's an expert on watmm...

including yourself. ;)

actually it's 3 out of 7, isn't it? that's almost half, if my GCSE maths serves me right.

even 2 out of 7 should be/is a big enough percentage/concern.

also, as mentioned, every other website/PC task performs fine.

i think the chat is hosted directly from ip board so its external

at osc...

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:26 PM, keltoi said:

a thread just took approx 5 seconds to load. every other site i have been on today has been lightening quick.

now don't get me wrong i'm no expert but this to me suggests that my internet connection is fine and my pc is functioning perfectly in every other way and that watmm is the issue.

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:48 PM, sirch said:

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:35 PM, oscillik said:

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:23 PM, keltoi said:

nothing wrong with my pc or internets either how dare you.

 

I'm not trying to be a cock here.

 

How do you know there's nothing wrong with your PC or your internets? Are you working for your ISP, and are able to perform network tests to ascertain this?

 

Out of 7 unique posters here, only 2 of them have issues. That leads more to suggest that there is a problem with equipment/connections at your end, rather than a problem with WATMM.

 

but i guess everyone's an expert on watmm...

 

including yourself. ;)

 

 

actually it's 3 out of 7, isn't it? that's almost half, if my GCSE maths serves me right.

even 2 out of 7 should be/is a big enough percentage/concern.

 

also, as mentioned, every other website/PC task performs fine.

Go back and count. it's actually 2 out of 7.

and yes, of course i counted myself in that statement.

  On 4/19/2012 at 6:02 PM, keltoi said:

at osc...

 

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:26 PM, keltoi said:

a thread just took approx 5 seconds to load. every other site i have been on today has been lightening quick.

 

now don't get me wrong i'm no expert but this to me suggests that my internet connection is fine and my pc is functioning perfectly in every other way and that watmm is the issue.

Are you using the DNS servers that are provided by your ISP? If so, then it absolutely could be to do with your internet connection.

Virgin Media have, in recent months, had issues relating to website access - some websites were working fine, some were excruciatingly slow, some wouldn't load at all. This was entirely an issue with Virgin Media.

There is precedent for this kind of issue being the fault of the ISP.

  On 4/19/2012 at 6:06 PM, oscillik said:

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:48 PM, sirch said:

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:35 PM, oscillik said:

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:23 PM, keltoi said:

nothing wrong with my pc or internets either how dare you.

 

I'm not trying to be a cock here.

 

How do you know there's nothing wrong with your PC or your internets? Are you working for your ISP, and are able to perform network tests to ascertain this?

 

Out of 7 unique posters here, only 2 of them have issues. That leads more to suggest that there is a problem with equipment/connections at your end, rather than a problem with WATMM.

 

but i guess everyone's an expert on watmm...

 

including yourself. ;)

 

 

actually it's 3 out of 7, isn't it? that's almost half, if my GCSE maths serves me right.

even 2 out of 7 should be/is a big enough percentage/concern.

 

also, as mentioned, every other website/PC task performs fine.

 

Go back and count. it's actually 2 out of 7.

 

and yes, of course i counted myself in that statement.

 

I included troon, or whatever he's called now.

anyway, not really that bothered if it's a bit slower now. was just saying.

osc don't worry. lol

  On 4/19/2012 at 6:10 PM, sirch said:

  On 4/19/2012 at 6:06 PM, oscillik said:

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:48 PM, sirch said:

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:35 PM, oscillik said:

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:23 PM, keltoi said:

nothing wrong with my pc or internets either how dare you.

 

I'm not trying to be a cock here.

 

How do you know there's nothing wrong with your PC or your internets? Are you working for your ISP, and are able to perform network tests to ascertain this?

 

Out of 7 unique posters here, only 2 of them have issues. That leads more to suggest that there is a problem with equipment/connections at your end, rather than a problem with WATMM.

 

but i guess everyone's an expert on watmm...

 

including yourself. ;)

 

 

actually it's 3 out of 7, isn't it? that's almost half, if my GCSE maths serves me right.

even 2 out of 7 should be/is a big enough percentage/concern.

 

also, as mentioned, every other website/PC task performs fine.

 

Go back and count. it's actually 2 out of 7.

 

and yes, of course i counted myself in that statement.

 

 

I included troon, or whatever he's called now.

why did you include Redruth? he said "chatmm is soggy"

This says nothing about the speed of WATMM, or indeed anything to do with WATMM. Merely stating that "chatmm is soggy". Whatever that means.

soggy cloggy boggy foggy... = inhibited functionality/performance/smell/texture. obviously!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  On 4/19/2012 at 6:06 PM, oscillik said:

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:48 PM, sirch said:

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:35 PM, oscillik said:

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:23 PM, keltoi said:

nothing wrong with my pc or internets either how dare you.

 

I'm not trying to be a cock here.

 

How do you know there's nothing wrong with your PC or your internets? Are you working for your ISP, and are able to perform network tests to ascertain this?

 

Out of 7 unique posters here, only 2 of them have issues. That leads more to suggest that there is a problem with equipment/connections at your end, rather than a problem with WATMM.

 

but i guess everyone's an expert on watmm...

 

including yourself. ;)

 

 

actually it's 3 out of 7, isn't it? that's almost half, if my GCSE maths serves me right.

even 2 out of 7 should be/is a big enough percentage/concern.

 

also, as mentioned, every other website/PC task performs fine.

 

Go back and count. it's actually 2 out of 7.

 

and yes, of course i counted myself in that statement.

 

  On 4/19/2012 at 6:02 PM, keltoi said:

at osc...

 

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:26 PM, keltoi said:

a thread just took approx 5 seconds to load. every other site i have been on today has been lightening quick.

 

now don't get me wrong i'm no expert but this to me suggests that my internet connection is fine and my pc is functioning perfectly in every other way and that watmm is the issue.

 

Are you using the DNS servers that are provided by your ISP?

how dare you!

ps. dunno what does that mean? i'm not with virgin here.

ppsp. troons pants are soggy

  On 4/19/2012 at 6:17 PM, sirch said:

soggy cloggy boggy foggy... = inhibited functionality/performance/smell/texture. obviously!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

yeah...which was said with pertinence to chatmm not watmm

  On 4/19/2012 at 6:23 PM, keltoi said:

  On 4/19/2012 at 6:06 PM, oscillik said:

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:48 PM, sirch said:

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:35 PM, oscillik said:

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:23 PM, keltoi said:

nothing wrong with my pc or internets either how dare you.

 

I'm not trying to be a cock here.

 

How do you know there's nothing wrong with your PC or your internets? Are you working for your ISP, and are able to perform network tests to ascertain this?

 

Out of 7 unique posters here, only 2 of them have issues. That leads more to suggest that there is a problem with equipment/connections at your end, rather than a problem with WATMM.

 

but i guess everyone's an expert on watmm...

 

including yourself. ;)

 

 

actually it's 3 out of 7, isn't it? that's almost half, if my GCSE maths serves me right.

even 2 out of 7 should be/is a big enough percentage/concern.

 

also, as mentioned, every other website/PC task performs fine.

 

Go back and count. it's actually 2 out of 7.

 

and yes, of course i counted myself in that statement.

 

  On 4/19/2012 at 6:02 PM, keltoi said:

at osc...

 

  On 4/19/2012 at 5:26 PM, keltoi said:

a thread just took approx 5 seconds to load. every other site i have been on today has been lightening quick.

 

now don't get me wrong i'm no expert but this to me suggests that my internet connection is fine and my pc is functioning perfectly in every other way and that watmm is the issue.

 

Are you using the DNS servers that are provided by your ISP?

 

how dare you!

 

ps. dunno what does that mean? i'm not with virgin here.

 

ppsp. troons pants are soggy

If you don't know what DNS means, then you are likely using the DNS that was provided by your ISP.

Fine here.