Jump to content
IGNORED

William Basinski - Disintegration Loops

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

  On 11/18/2013 at 2:44 PM, k h o v said:

 

  On 11/17/2013 at 9:26 PM, John Ehrlichman said:

Personally I'm surprised that in all my time of listening to ambient music and being in the experimental scene I had literally not heard his name until the Disintegration Loops, and all of the sudden he's somehow a really important dude with this long history, as if he's been working so hard at this for so long that Loops was like his magnum opus.

 

with all your time of listening to ambient music and being in the experimental scene, you could have figured out that he released Shortwavemusic on Raster Noton in 1998.

 

that's the earliest official known release of his though right? I don't follow raster noton closely nor have I ever, but I was aware of this release after I heard Loops. 1998 a long history does not make. I know it's supposed to be some kind of archive release, but seems again suspicious to me. Sorry I do not believe it :sad:

 

especially this part

 

 

  Quote

 

 

Originally recorded in New York in 1982, Shortwavemusic was left to gather dust for 16 years until Raster-Noton issued the album on clear vinyl in 1998.

how did someone who's now revered is so awesome make music for so long and have absolutely no one talking about him until he released this LP? that question has not been answered yet

Edited by John Ehrlichman
  • Replies 363
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  On 11/17/2013 at 9:45 PM, Alcofribas said:

as I explained above, he experimented with loops in the late 70s and early 80s but nothing came of it. in NYC during that time he simply never made an impression.

this is what I'm curious about, how could someone who's music is so revered now in the 00's not make an 'impression' making and releasing small runs of stuff for so long? It just seems really odd to me. His wikipedia page is fleshed out with a detailed back story of this period when he supposedly made no impression, who's verified it?

It's not like he ever made pop music. Or that every super talented person out there get lots of fame.

the-shining-july-ball-1921.jpg

He was there from the beguining......William Basinski is the Jack Torrance of electronica.

Honestly i dont know, perhaps you're right, all i know for sure is that i truly love his loops & drones.

Quick, someone carbon date Basinski's reel tapes.

 

Whatever happened to just enjoying the music? If you need the 9/11 connotation or a 30 year period of non-recognition to justify listening to his work, then you're probably missing the point in the first place.

Instead of just repeating the same arguments without any evidence, let's look at some facts.

Fact is he played saxophone on 2 albums that were released in 1979 and 1987, both of which are not even close to ambient tape loop experimenting.

http://www.discogs.com/Infra-Dig-Infra-Dig/release/1616163

http://www.discogs.com/Black-Randy-And-The-Metrosquad-Pass-The-Dust-I-Think-Im-Bowie/release/1366031

+ his work in this group: http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default.cfm?bandID=175388

Another fact that can't be denied is his Arcadia, since one member here was actually there, I recall some old user on here even saw Diamanda Galas there once in the early 90's? + he said he did loads of jams with bands in his space in NY in the 80's in a YT interview (I believe it was this one http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moJa-rpGfp8 ) so that proves that he had at least some connections in the music world back in those days.

 

And finally, he pretty much explains his whole 80's story in detail here: http://www.houstonchronicle.com/life/article/Composer-William-Basinski-in-search-of-the-4870022.php#/0

 

"Hegarty (of Antony and the Johnsons) is one of a few people who possess some of Basinski's early cassettes. "I used the music as the soundtrack to my own life and work in theater," he says."

 

So, yeah, believe what you will, I believe him as it is really not that farfetched.

William-Basinski.jpg

Edited by Herr Jan

well i guess i was wrong them, now i understand why it took so long for his career to take off and when it did he only has old recordings to show people s before he did a David Bowie Labyrinth impressio from the 80s in the 00'n. it all makes sense now. I was under the mistaken impression that during his whole career he made loop based ambient music, but clearly that is not the case. He had a musical career
but a much different less impressive one that is fleshed out in his press backstories

so in essence he was a pretty typical artsy 80s musician that didn't get 'discovered' by the experimental art world until 1998 for a few side projects he did involved soundtracky work, which again cannot be proven to have been made previous to the late 90s

I appreciate the notion of him working for so long doing so many different things that never took off, so I do understand the desire to 'lift him up' and give the guy a chance since he's old now. It's a pretty charitable act actually.

edit: at the very least, the only true part of what I've theorized here is that someone has done a very good job of representing him (now) as a much more avant-garde musician than he clearly was for most of his career. It's an interesting spin/rewriting history press job. So this is a learning moment for me, to differentiate between a complete hoax and a 'juking the stats' style rewriting/lie of omission historical overview

Edited by John Ehrlichman

i don't find his music interesting in the least, but how is this a "successful" hoax? he's not known outside the pfork hipster/autistic drone fan crowd, probably doesn't make enough money to live. you've got to have a seriously unreal life outlook to think any of these artists, even the ones making some money, are living some kind of wealthy lifestyle. i'm sure he's supplemented the reality of his backstory to get publicity among the few publications that give a shit about this kind of music, but it's not like he's this outsider music supervillain laughing his way to the bank. go outside more and stop reading about electronic music gossip if you think that.

  On 11/18/2013 at 10:28 PM, John Ehrlichman said:

well i guess i was wrong them, now i understand why it took so long for his career to take off and when it did he only has old recordings to show people s before he did a David Bowie Labyrinth impressio from the 80s in the 00'n. it all makes sense now. I was under the mistaken impression that during his whole career he made loop based ambient music, but clearly that is not the case. He had a musical career
but a much different less impressive one that is fleshed out in his press backstories

so in essence he was a pretty typical artsy 80s musician that didn't get 'discovered' by the experimental art world until 1998 for a few side projects he did involved soundtracky work, which again cannot be proven to have been made previous to the late 90s

I appreciate the notion of him working for so long doing so many different things that never took off, so I do understand the desire to 'lift him up' and give the guy a chance since he's old now. It's a pretty charitable act actually.

edit: at the very least, the only true part of what I've theorized here is that someone has done a very good job of representing him (now) as a much more avant-garde musician than he clearly was for most of his career. It's an interesting spin/rewriting history press job. So this is a learning moment for me, to differentiate between a complete hoax and a 'juking the stats' style rewriting/lie of omission historical overview

 

Apart from that, yeah, pretty much. In that interview I posted above he comes across as saying like he just dabbled in recording random stuff (radiosignals, radiobroadcasts, piano jams, whatever) on tapes. I always assumed he began to rediscover those recordings since the late 90's and then reworked them in the studio to become what they are. For example, in two albums/tracks of him you hear the exact same piano loop but reworked a different way, which just shows he probably only had the piano part he cut to a loop (wether he cut the loop in the 80's or later, we'll never know, but that doesn't make the music less impressive).

IMO you should blame the journalists more than the artist for having these false hyped up preconceptions of the artist's history. Journo mythologizing happens all the time and afaik only one musician rewrote his history himself to be cool (a shitty black metal solo artist, Nargaroth).

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Herr Jan, yes exactly. You are dead on the money. But i take issue with what Zaphod said above, I live in a pretentious artistic musical hipster shit-storm zone. Of course he doesn't have anything remotely close to mainstream success, but to underestimate the influence press outlets like Pitchfork has on 'bubbles' ( it put it in quotes because his name is literally a household term in the electronic music scene here) would be naive. He is a musical super villain, pure and simple

Edited by John Ehrlichman
  On 11/18/2013 at 11:50 PM, John Ehrlichman said:

Herr Jan, yes exactly. You are dead on the money. But i take issue with what Zaphod said above, I live in a pretentious artistic musical hipster shit-storm zone. Of course he doesn't have anything remotely close to mainstream success, but to underestimate the influence press outlets like Pitchfork has on 'bubbles' ( it put it in quotes because his name is literally a household term in the electronic music scene here) would be naive. He is a musical super villain, pure and simple

 

i don't underestimate the influence pitchfork has on him. i said in my post that pitchfork is one of the publications that made him famous. he tops out there. i'm saying maybe get some perspective about "success". if by success you mean that he's guaranteed to come in 14th place on every p4k "top 100 albums of the 00's" list then he should be writing books with malcolm gladwell. let's be real here, he's shrewdly manipulative in his association of imagery with his (imo) boring music. i'm sure there's a conflation of real and fake in his backstory, but as alcofribrasss said, it's literally the shittiest long con ever. "the greatest trick the devil ever played was convincing the world he was an unsuccessful musician in the 80s and a mildly successful drone musician in the aughts"? lol

But at the same time every artist try to make things mythical if anything. Bob Dylan invented a whole backstory to his life when he started in NYC, saying he played in Bobby Vee's band, that he was a teenager riding the rails and traveled with a circus. Did that change anything in the end?

 

The BOC brothers not telling they were brothers, creating a lot of weird aura of mystery behind all their creation. And let's not talk about Richard here, we could list a thousand idiosyncrasies.

 

My point being, does this take out anything from his music? Can it stand alone, and listen to it without the 9/11 gimmick? Or his other stuff, if you never knew about the history, does it change anything?

*** This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez Corporation

*** helping America into the New World...

lol oh awepittace sometimes..... <3 for days man but can I just give you a hug!

  On 11/24/2015 at 12:29 PM, Salvatorin said:

I feel there is a baobab tree growing out of my head, its leaves stretch up to the heavens

  

 

 

  • 3 months later...

the march issue of wire has an article about Arcadia fyi to stimulate all those who remain curious on this controversial topic. i believe edward snowden now lives there...

  On 11/19/2013 at 12:43 AM, zaphod said:

 

  On 11/18/2013 at 11:50 PM, John Ehrlichman said:

Herr Jan, yes exactly. You are dead on the money. But i take issue with what Zaphod said above, I live in a pretentious artistic musical hipster shit-storm zone. Of course he doesn't have anything remotely close to mainstream success, but to underestimate the influence press outlets like Pitchfork has on 'bubbles' ( it put it in quotes because his name is literally a household term in the electronic music scene here) would be naive. He is a musical super villain, pure and simple

 

i don't underestimate the influence pitchfork has on him. i said in my post that pitchfork is one of the publications that made him famous. he tops out there. i'm saying maybe get some perspective about "success". if by success you mean that he's guaranteed to come in 14th place on every p4k "top 100 albums of the 00's" list then he should be writing books with malcolm gladwell. let's be real here, he's shrewdly manipulative in his association of imagery with his (imo) boring music. i'm sure there's a conflation of real and fake in his backstory, but as alcofribrasss said, it's literally the shittiest long con ever. "the greatest trick the devil ever played was convincing the world he was an unsuccessful musician in the 80s and a mildly successful drone musician in the aughts"? lol

 

 

 

oh lol

  On 11/24/2015 at 12:29 PM, Salvatorin said:

I feel there is a baobab tree growing out of my head, its leaves stretch up to the heavens

  

 

 

Holy lol calling Basinski a musical super villain. That's amazing.

 

I completely forgot about this wonderful thread. Thx for the bump.

  • 5 months later...

these get individual releases on CD this september 1st.

 

i've long been tempted by them, and managed to get a good pre-order deal on them at £7.50 each, so giving them a try.

not sure about just how they balance between stillness and (very) slow evolution, but at that price ...

  • 3 weeks later...
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 Member

×
×