Jump to content
IGNORED

Nelson Mandela Dead.


Recommended Posts

"Mandela is kill"

"no"

 

Alternate insensitive joke about how it was chunky all along.

 

(RIP)

Edited by baph
  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  On 12/6/2013 at 7:19 AM, baph said:

"Mandela is kill" "no" Alternate insensitive joke about how it was chunky all along. (RIP)

i dunt understod this joak

  On 11/24/2015 at 12:29 PM, Salvatorin said:

I feel there is a baobab tree growing out of my head, its leaves stretch up to the heavens

  

 

 

  On 12/6/2013 at 5:16 PM, dr lopez said:

 

  On 12/6/2013 at 7:19 AM, baph said:

"Mandela is kill" "no" Alternate insensitive joke about how it was chunky all along. (RIP)

i dunt understod this joak

 

 

it might have helped if tapatalk hadn't posted it as one line of text for some reason

Edited by baph

no the chunky part

  On 11/24/2015 at 12:29 PM, Salvatorin said:

I feel there is a baobab tree growing out of my head, its leaves stretch up to the heavens

  

 

 

  On 12/6/2013 at 5:18 PM, dr lopez said:

no the chunky part

 

oh, oh, ok

 

JOKE EXPLAINED: chunky made a thread a few days ago that was like "last post i are dying tomorro i enjoyed trolling u all," and I thought that it would be funny as a total non sequitur to pretend that someone with chunky's persona's, errr, "conservative" viewpoints could actually be someone like Nelson Mandela trolling a forum.

 

:hits canned laughter button on computer:

 

edit: see from previous Mandela is Dying thread:

 

  On 6/25/2013 at 7:16 AM, chunky said:

terrorist

 

I mean no disrespect to NM, of course.

Edited by baph

It's weird everybody was waiting for him to die to express how cool and awesome he is. You could've told him when he could have cared... how inconsiderate

  On 12/6/2013 at 7:07 PM, ThatSpanishGuy said:

It's weird everybody was waiting for him to die to express how cool and awesome he is. You could've told him when he could have cared... how inconsiderate

 

Nelson knew he was cool.

 

Edited by baph
Guest disparaissant

People on NPR keep hammering home the point that Reagan declared him a terrorist, and that David Cameron campaigned to have him executed in the 80s, totally neglecting to notice that when two asshats of THAT magnitude calling you a terrorists and you're doing something right...

  On 12/6/2013 at 9:08 PM, disparaissant said:

People on NPR keep hammering home the point that Reagan declared him a terrorist, and that David Cameron campaigned to have him executed in the 80s, totally neglecting to notice that when two asshats of THAT magnitude calling you a terrorists and you're doing something right...

 

One person's "terrorists" is another person's "freedom fighters" - the differences are usually an arbitrary ones. Things are never that simple. In the 80s it was still completely about the Cold War. In the case of South Africa (which is extremely complicated overall), the US and UK wanted to keep a major non-USSR aligned government in power. If I recall correctly the SA war on Angola is primarily why Reagan vetoed sanctions when most other countries were already boycotting the county. Best way to convince voters is take the most militant and violent portion of a broad anti-oppression movement and label them terrorists.

 

Most Americans don't know anything about Apartheid's rise and fall, but a few nonetheless follow the right-wing rhetoric of the 80s. You'll probably find this interesting:

 

http://austinist.com/2013/12/06/ted_cruz_said_something_nice_about.php

 

...in this particular case, I'm shocked he wrote anything at all, he's a self-described paleoconservative. He wouldn't be expected to sympathize with post-colonial stuggles in Africa, let alone comment on them. Hell his staffer probably wrote it. It's basically a way of working Mandela's death into yet another zinger about "liberty."

 

I honestly find any domestic political "discussion" about foreign policy nothing but maddening. You can't translate an overseas conflict into a domestic 2-party system debate, but they do anyway. Libya and Syria especially...everything said about comes down to finger-pointing and bullshit talking-points. That goes for both Dems and the GOP. Those actually in power, even ones who engage in the debates in public, their all on the same page behind closed doors: McCain and Kerry have worked together for years. Obama kept more than half of Bush's intel and defense advisors. There's very little "division" in reality...most of the public buys into it anyway.

Edited by joshuatx
  On 12/6/2013 at 7:07 PM, goDel said:

He was particularly old. Not quite. IMO. I'd almost agree though.

 

he was 95. you have got to be kidding.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 Member

×
×