"Cop Murders Unarmed Civilian" Thread

i personally like how he forces her out of the car and then out of the fov of the dash cam. clever dan

i feel for you peeps in the u.s... i see more and more stuff like this pop up on my facebook being shared. unbelievable

http://www.mintpressnews.com/chicago-fires-investigator-who-found-cops-at-fault-in-shootings/207778/

There's no need to make a song and dance about it. Really, no please dont. Oh god no - http://www.villagevoice.com/news/video-heres-the-blackface-act-of-the-baltimore-cop-hosting-a-fundraiser-for-cops-charged-in-freddie-grays-death-7406719

Ugh. Just feeling sad at those last two posts.

  On 7/23/2015 at 7:35 PM, chenGOD said:

Ugh. Just feeling sad at those last two posts.

+1.

That vid of Berger doing his 'act' is pure nightmare fuel

If you are going to post a link please post a headline, or excerpt.

Also, in Texas, it's legal to arrest someone for any infraction that isn't a speeding violation. How insane is that...

And it's technically illegal to refuse an order from an officer. What constitutes lawful, I'm not sure.

http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/txstatutes/TN/7/C/542/E/542.501

- See more at: http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/txstatutes/TN/7/C/542/E/542.501#sthash.R4OO5R2G.dpuf

lawful i would assume means that a police officer can't order you to break the law.

watched that today. I find that opening facebook and watching the flood of police brutality videos coming in is a great way to start the day.

  On 7/22/2015 at 7:42 PM, juiceciuj said:

almost certainly this one: http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/21/us/texas-sandra-bland-jail-death-explain/index.html

 

http://gawker.com/what-the-hell-is-going-on-in-the-dashcam-video-of-sandr-1719479187

 

https://twitter.com/jlangdale/status/623863375731261440/photo/1

whats odd about that is that those types of gaps wouldn't show up from simple editing or excising of time

what it could mean is that someone was playing the original recording from one device, cueing it up to specific points and skipping over others into a destination recording device. Having actual gaps in the audio don't make much sense if it was just edited in a daw

  On 7/30/2015 at 12:02 AM, John Ehrlichman said:

 

  On 7/22/2015 at 7:42 PM, juiceciuj said:

almost certainly this one: http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/21/us/texas-sandra-bland-jail-death-explain/index.html

 

http://gawker.com/what-the-hell-is-going-on-in-the-dashcam-video-of-sandr-1719479187

 

https://twitter.com/jlangdale/status/623863375731261440/photo/1

whats odd about that is that those types of gaps wouldn't show up from simple editing or excising of time

what it could mean is that someone was playing the original recording from one device, cueing it up to specific points and skipping over others into a destination recording device. Having actual gaps in the audio don't make much sense if it was just edited in a daw

 

there aren't many audio engineers in law enforcement

i doubt the person who did the editing even had access to a daw

or hell, even knew what a daw is

i think you're right that it was probably edited old school dub down-style

Cop who shot unarmed man Sam Dubose in the head and killed him had a history of needlessly harassing african american men.

i'm sure it's just a coincidence

  On 7/29/2015 at 11:11 PM, LimpyLoo said:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0cdejrSjyc

I get all giddy at the thought of this pig having to poop out AIDS for the rest of his life behind bars. Not even edgy, tbh

I'm sure that's why they hired him.

  On 8/1/2015 at 6:56 PM, Candiru said:

 

  On 7/29/2015 at 11:11 PM, LimpyLoo said:

I get all giddy at the thought of this pig having to poop out AIDS for the rest of his life behind bars. Not even edgy, tbh

 

*cuts finger on Candiru*

Look, it's not that hard to get along with the cops. Just stop being african american, alright?

I hadn't seen that video until now... That's just plain ridiculous. There are many ways to look up if someone has a valid license and that police officer put himself and the person of interest in danger by reaching into the vehicle and not asking the man to step out and wait until backup arrives. If he hadn't gone all Yosemite Sam on the dude and he did drive away, they'd have caught him hours or minutes later and put him in cuffs... or shot him in the face there

the fact stands that this man straight up murdered someone for no reason.

  On 7/23/2015 at 11:21 PM, chenGOD said:

lawful i would assume means that a police officer can't order you to break the law.

from what i've been reading recently lawful order means something they are legally allowed to order you to do. In many cases it's depend on circumstance, in Sandra Bland's case it was illegal for him to request she put out her cigarette or exit the vehicle.

  On 8/1/2015 at 7:36 PM, maitake said:

Look, it's not that hard to get along with the cops. Just stop being african american, alright?

  On 8/1/2015 at 7:42 PM, AdieuErsatzEnnui said:

 

  On 7/23/2015 at 11:21 PM, chenGOD said:

lawful i would assume means that a police officer can't order you to break the law.

 

 

from what i've been reading recently lawful order means something they are legally allowed to order you to do. In many cases it's depend on circumstance, in Sandra Bland's case it was illegal for him to request she put out her cigarette or exit the vehicle.

 

 

 

Hmmm interesting, I didn't think about it that way. A few minutes reading seems to indicate you're on the right track with that line of thinking.

For a nice look into how police officers respond to someone questioning their "right to tell you what to do", this thread is great:

http://forums.officer.com/t98821-2/

  On 8/2/2015 at 8:14 AM, chenGOD said:

 

  On 8/1/2015 at 7:42 PM, AdieuErsatzEnnui said:

 

  On 7/23/2015 at 11:21 PM, chenGOD said:

lawful i would assume means that a police officer can't order you to break the law.

 

 

from what i've been reading recently lawful order means something they are legally allowed to order you to do. In many cases it's depend on circumstance, in Sandra Bland's case it was illegal for him to request she put out her cigarette or exit the vehicle.

 

 

 

 

Hmmm interesting, I didn't think about it that way. A few minutes reading seems to indicate you're on the right track with that line of thinking.

For a nice look into how police officers respond to someone questioning their "right to tell you what to do", this thread is great:

http://forums.officer.com/t98821-2/

 

What I read was sort of moment by moment breakdown of the stop by a lawyer. Basically indicating there is no precedent for requesting her put her cigarette out nor any kind of law regarding such a thing. Then the recent SCOTUS decision about lengthening traffic stops unnecessarily is directly broken by his removing her from her vehicle. Had he immediately asked her to step out of her vehicle before he had gone through with all of the other parts of the stop then he might have been ok doing so. The lawyer also stated it is legal to use reasonable force against an officer infringing upon your rights in order to stop them, but you aren't allowed to do things like punch them.

  On 8/2/2015 at 8:14 AM, chenGOD said:

 

  On 8/1/2015 at 7:42 PM, AdieuErsatzEnnui said:

 

  On 7/23/2015 at 11:21 PM, chenGOD said:

lawful i would assume means that a police officer can't order you to break the law.

 

 

from what i've been reading recently lawful order means something they are legally allowed to order you to do. In many cases it's depend on circumstance, in Sandra Bland's case it was illegal for him to request she put out her cigarette or exit the vehicle.

 

 

 

 

Hmmm interesting, I didn't think about it that way. A few minutes reading seems to indicate you're on the right track with that line of thinking.

For a nice look into how police officers respond to someone questioning their "right to tell you what to do", this thread is great:

http://forums.officer.com/t98821-2/

 

I can't read that forum there are police talking about the laws they use to destroy the rights of citizens and they think it's ok.

  On 8/1/2015 at 7:36 PM, maitake said:

Look, it's not that hard to get along with the cops. Just stop being african american, alright?

cops kill more white people than black people in the USofA, and even though they make up twelve per cent of the population, black criminals kill, attack and rob much more white people than the reverse.

I'm not saying the incident you guys were talking about is not ridiculous in the extreme and fucking cold stupid murder. But i just don't like that whole you're racist if you're white thing because black people were mistreated. It's some over zealous and militarized cops terrorizing everybody. And if you're poor more so. So everyone is getting mistreated and if we start calling misdeeds against others 'racism' well would the crime stats as they stand then mean that black people are more racist towards white people than the reverse. If we were to buy into the thinking that is being sold to us, well it's logic would suggest so wouldn't it. So don't buy into all this divisive bullshit, we all need to stand together and see who the real problem in society is, and it's not us. The them are globalist banking cartels that are using their long entrenched influence and limitless print money cashbox to overreacharound and fuck us all.

fuck i bet 'officer forums' is a barrel of laughs