LimpyLoo Posted December 10, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 10, 2016 On 12/10/2016 at 4:48 AM, Audioblysk said: I'm really bad a music in general. Apparently I stick to melodic and harmonic minor keys and occasional other stuff. I don't think I've ever tried making a 'by the numbers' music theory track. Make me a chord combo to futz with limperz. 'Make me better Just to clarify: imo the goal isn't to learn how to do this or that specific thing...the goal is to become conscious of these details when you're making a tune. For instance, let's say you're writing a 3-voice synth part outlining the harmony of your choon. Well, simply *knowing* that you can treat these 3 voices as independent melodies (while still outlining the harmony) is like 99% of the battle. That's the biggest reason to study theory IMO. Maslow's (IIRC) stages of competence: -unconscious incompetence -conscious incompetence -conscious competence -unconscious competence Thanks Haha Confused Sad Facepalm Burger Farnsworth Big Brain Like × Quote Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/81898-bride-of-limpyloos-tip-du-jour/page/3/#findComment-2508233 Share on other sites More sharing options...
LimpyLoo Posted December 10, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 10, 2016 On 4/9/2014 at 8:36 AM, anigbrowl said: Well, I plonked my hand down randomly on the keyboard with my eyes closed and removed obvious duplicates, but I didn't mean to tie you down to any particular voicings! If they're not working out, I took the same roots and threw dice for the chord type: Fmaj7 D Bm G6 G#min7 Am B F#6. Whichever you prefer! Here's a start... E >D > D >D C >C# > B >B A > A >G# >G F > F# >F# >E You might try adding (individual) melodic movement in between the chords, almost like a choral piece Thanks Haha Confused Sad Facepalm Burger Farnsworth Big Brain Like × Quote Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/81898-bride-of-limpyloos-tip-du-jour/page/3/#findComment-2508237 Share on other sites More sharing options...
LimpyLoo Posted December 14, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 14, 2016 I never know what to spit So instead I'll field requests if anyone has anything that's been puzzling them Also, here are the composers/improvisers I've been studying the last year Lemme know if y'all wanna know anything about them: Coltrane Bartok Messiaen Rautavaara Grisey, Murail, Xenakis Ligeti Steve Coleman (possibly biggest musical genius alive) Brad Mehldau Herbie, McCoy Charlie Parker Thanks Haha Confused Sad Facepalm Burger Farnsworth Big Brain Like × Quote Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/81898-bride-of-limpyloos-tip-du-jour/page/3/#findComment-2509444 Share on other sites More sharing options...
LimpyLoo Posted January 17, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 17, 2017 (edited) Rautavaara, Symmetrical Motion, Octave-Dependant Scales Let's talk about Rautavaara and his evil-as-fuck "Étude #1": https://youtube.com/watch?v=FFPjFjUonX8 I first heard that choon the day after Rautavaara died. I had never in my life heard someone able to manipulate harmony in such a bizarre and transcendent way. Nor to summon such pathos out of harmony like a snake-charmer. Enter Messiaen and Bartok: -Messiaen was obsessed with symmetrical scales and harmony -Bartok was obsessed with symmetrical movement around a 'tonal axis' (imagine Narcissus looking at his reflection in the pond: the 'tonal axis' is the pond, and so 'as above, so below') Well, "Étude #1" uses both. Here's how those evil arpeggios are constructed: Let's say our 'tonal axis' (aka "Narcissus' pond") is the note 'G' Those 20th century composers loved interval-sets "Étude #1" is based on the interval-set (3,4,1) (Remembering that 3 intervals produce a 4-note set And that the intervals refer to semi-tones/half-steps Although for you Spectralism/non-12tet deviants, this shit is just waiting to harvested, and the elegance of the math will survive any pitch-to-frequency or linear-to-logarithmic refraction) So let's generate those intervals--both up and down--from the 'tonal axis' ('G') Down = (G) E, C, B Up = (G) Bb, D, Eb Now, if we assemble them into 3rds, we get: (Low to high) C, E, G, B, Eb, G, Bb, D That's a Cmajor7 with an Ebmaj7 dropped on top And it happens to appear in Messiaen Mode #3 (C, D, Eb, --- E, F#, G, --- Ab, Bb, B) Which (as the dashes indicate) is just the repeating interval-set (2,1) Generated (up or down) in major-thirds, at C E and Ab So Rautavaara does just that with these arpeggios Up and down a major-third So you get some evil, spacetime-bending arpeggios: (Pardon the sloppiness lol) https://vimeo.com/199841199 p.s. And of course the chordal parts of "Étude #1" use the same logic The LH-triad and RH-triad move symmetrically around a tonal axis And the result is Messiaen Mode #3 Edited January 17, 2017 by LimpyLoo Thanks Haha Confused Sad Facepalm Burger Farnsworth Big Brain Like × Quote Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/81898-bride-of-limpyloos-tip-du-jour/page/3/#findComment-2518503 Share on other sites More sharing options...
LimpyLoo Posted January 17, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 17, 2017 Edit: sorry wrong YT link...(fucking YouTube auto-next) This is "Etudes": https://youtube.com/watch?v=nvZ1dzZry1w Thanks Haha Confused Sad Facepalm Burger Farnsworth Big Brain Like × Quote Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/81898-bride-of-limpyloos-tip-du-jour/page/3/#findComment-2518506 Share on other sites More sharing options...
LimpyLoo Posted January 18, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 18, 2017 (If any mod ever feels like rectifying my 'wrong link' mistake, my orderliness-obsession would be eternally grateful!) Thanks Haha Confused Sad Facepalm Burger Farnsworth Big Brain Like × Quote Link to comment https://forum.watmm.com/topic/81898-bride-of-limpyloos-tip-du-jour/page/3/#findComment-2518768 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts