2014: the year Ellen Page made scores of neckbeards cry out in psychic anguish

  On 2/19/2014 at 7:03 AM, AdieuErsatzEnnui said:

 

  On 2/19/2014 at 7:01 AM, LimpyLoo said:

This all just feels like code for...well, you know.

 

yes?

Homophobia.

It feels like 'no I'm not racist, but I preferred things the way they were before black people had rights. It destroyed the institution.'

  On 2/19/2014 at 7:13 AM, sheatheman said:

I'm having fun with this thread. Seeing mister E viewing the thread that first time was like watching Goku descend from Snakeway.

 

I have tons of gay/lesbian/gendervariant friends. Love 'em to pieces. To be fair, the comparison to women's rights is a fallacy. There is no concrete science that homosexuality is black and white biology, therefore the fear spoken of is based on behavior, not on genes.

 

The rush to biology is happening because the knee jerk is to blame someone else. If they can't help it then any in opposition are "on the wrong side of history." It's clever stuff. There is definitely something else behind it.

 

Fact is I would love you whether it was a choice or genetic predisposition.

 

Meanwhile I'm in an interracial and highly rewarding cis-marriage.

It's exactly the same as women's rights because you have societies built by bigots and misogynists who determined for themselves how society would operate. Then after they made those decisions they influenced others to feel the same way as much as possible until you had a ruling patriarchy that diminished as many as possible in order to maintain power and control.

Same for women, blacks, and homos.

Nah, people try to confirm biology because those in opposition to the behavior demand something more substantial than "I prefer this", because they are adhering to ideology that was written before we had a mathematical equation for how gravity functions and when we believed we were the center of the universe. Why would someone blame someone else for their own sexuality unless they were socially conditioned to believe there is something wrong with them? Interesting that science is a necessity for proof to those for whom their personal beliefs rely so little.

If you love them then you would promote the idea that they should be given all the same liberties that you enjoy.

Also, I very much enjoyed the Mr. E. moment.

You still owe me examples of how accepting homosexuality accelerates the collapse of a society. Sodom and Gomorrah will not be acceptable. No fables please.

People still trying to float the idea that sexual preference is a matter of choice...that's some anti-science lol right there.

Seriously. It's 2014.

Wow this thread... "marriage", seriously?? In these times?

  On 2/19/2014 at 7:13 AM, sheatheman said:

I'm having fun with this thread. Seeing mister E viewing the thread that first time was like watching Goku descend from Snakeway.

 

I have tons of gay/lesbian/gendervariant friends. Love 'em to pieces. To be fair, the comparison to women's rights is a fallacy. There is no concrete science that homosexuality is black and white biology, therefore the fear spoken of is based on behavior, not on genes.

 

The rush to biology is happening because the knee jerk is to blame someone else. If they can't help it then any in opposition are "on the wrong side of history." It's clever stuff. There is definitely something else behind it.

 

Fact is I would love you whether it was a choice or genetic predisposition.

 

Meanwhile I'm in an interracial and highly rewarding cis-marriage.

Cool. Maybe one of your kids will be gay and it will be like God's way of testing your faith and you can go to church and give a big speech on how your son was born gay to deepen your relationship with Jesus Christ and everyone will applaud and your son will definitely not be present.

Just strolling on by to say that I am sad that I have no chance with Ellen Page as my carnal desires for her were and still are, quite high.

The fuck is with the gay marriage debate? This thread is about a fine honey becoming a clam-shacker. Start a gay marriage debate thread

EDIT: P.S. Candiru is on fire here.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/sep/16/sexuality-nature-nurture-debate

Written by someone who's done more research than any of us. Really? In 2013?

11 more Pages!

  On 2/19/2014 at 8:20 AM, autopilot said:

11 more Pages!

It'll pick back up when that croatian dude comes back to ruin me.

Elleven Page

From the WHO:

  Quote

Behavioural traits, such as aggression or sexuality, are extremely complex and cannot be explained by one gene or genetic component. Cultural norms pertaining to gender roles and sex-related behaviours fluctuate and change with time as well as across cultures. Moreover, the existence of a gene does not guarantee the expression of that gene; indeed, expression is the product of a complex network of other genetic, developmental, biological and environmental factors. It is this complex network of interactions that constantly shape and define behaviours. (54) Any genetic component that is found to be linked to a complex behavioural trait at most indicates a probability of that behaviour manifesting, and not that the behaviour will definitely occur. Behavioural genetics research is still in its infancy, and its capacity to identify any genetic component of behaviours, such as sex -specific conduct, is limited.

Come on WHO, this is 2014!!!

Source: http://www.who.int/genomics/gender/en/index2.html

Yes, sheathman you will wake up gay tomorrow, in a few months, a few years, you can't be too sure.

Something else to consider.

Yeah, she needs the extra room for her holographic dick.

  On 2/19/2014 at 8:23 AM, kokoon said:

Elleven Page

lol

What I don't get is why so many people think it's nature vs choice. It's nature or nurture, guys; nurture is NOT choice. I believe that homosexuality is nature and nurture, neither of which means a person chooses it. I think subconscious choice does have some impact, but little compared to the other two things.

Like, who cares if it's not entirely set when you're born? Just because you weren't born with a disposition doesn't mean that you chose it.

  On 2/19/2014 at 8:34 AM, sheatheman said:

From the WHO:

 

  Quote

Behavioural traits, such as aggression or sexuality, are extremely complex and cannot be explained by one gene or genetic component. Cultural norms pertaining to gender roles and sex-related behaviours fluctuate and change with time as well as across cultures. Moreover, the existence of a gene does not guarantee the expression of that gene; indeed, expression is the product of a complex network of other genetic, developmental, biological and environmental factors. It is this complex network of interactions that constantly shape and define behaviours. (54) Any genetic component that is found to be linked to a complex behavioural trait at most indicates a probability of that behaviour manifesting, and not that the behaviour will definitely occur. Behavioural genetics research is still in its infancy, and its capacity to identify any genetic component of behaviours, such as sex -specific conduct, is limited.

Come on WHO, this is 2014!!!

Source: http://www.who.int/genomics/gender/en/index2.html

 

How is this important?

This probably has been one of the worst debates in internet history.

nobody wins, /thread, hellen page is gay

  On 2/19/2014 at 11:24 AM, Deer said:

This probably has been one of the worst debates in internet history.

 

nobody wins, /thread, hellen page is gay

shut up deer

I wish I was gay Ellen Page... that would be awesome... ( ( ( far away look ) ) )

uh oh

Forget Ellen Page....

I'd rather be their double dildo, or at least the strap that they reserve for anal play.

LOL is that donald trump?

lol this thread.

Holy fuck, did this topic get stupid... This site really does seem autistic sometimes.

  On 2/19/2014 at 8:58 AM, AdieuErsatzEnnui said:

 

  On 2/19/2014 at 8:34 AM, sheatheman said:

From the WHO:

 

  Quote

Behavioural traits, such as aggression or sexuality, are extremely complex and cannot be explained by one gene or genetic component. Cultural norms pertaining to gender roles and sex-related behaviours fluctuate and change with time as well as across cultures. Moreover, the existence of a gene does not guarantee the expression of that gene; indeed, expression is the product of a complex network of other genetic, developmental, biological and environmental factors. It is this complex network of interactions that constantly shape and define behaviours. (54) Any genetic component that is found to be linked to a complex behavioural trait at most indicates a probability of that behaviour manifesting, and not that the behaviour will definitely occur. Behavioural genetics research is still in its infancy, and its capacity to identify any genetic component of behaviours, such as sex -specific conduct, is limited.

Come on WHO, this is 2014!!!

Source: http://www.who.int/genomics/gender/en/index2.html

 

 

How is this important?

 

Because, I said there is no science that says homosexuality is 100% biology. Nurture plays a huge part, and honestly, if there is nothing wrong with it, why is it so offensive that it could be a choice for some more than others?

I think biology, environment, and volition are all factors for behavior.

Besides, most people want her to be born gay, because otherwise it would mean she chose not to fulfill their impotent fantasies. There's only so much a "man" can take.