Unreleased Fenix Funk

  On 10/1/2014 at 12:02 PM, jasondonervan said:

FLAC showing as 24bit...

 

Is it still possible for him to just convert the 128kpbs to a 24 bit wav/flac? Not an expert, but I can't imagine that such a random person is in possession of this, Richard shared them with someone that he obviously trusts and if they would appear, they would appear via that noyze blog.

There's a hefty FLAC download link on this 'unreleased Aphex' nonsense that FACT posted on April Fool's Day, same uploader:

http://youtu.be/tyQufYJEssY

Looking more and more like shifty shenanigans if you ask me

WAV from youtube link:

Soundcloud version:

lol

  On 10/1/2014 at 12:12 PM, jasondonervan said:

There's a hefty FLAC download link on this 'unreleased Aphex' nonsense that FACT posted on April Fool's Day, same uploader:

 

http://youtu.be/tyQufYJEssY

 

Looking more and more like shifty shenanigans if you ask me

i remember back a while back, friend was trying to upload something to what(or oink, or whatever) and it was downloaded from myspace and kept getting rejected for being low quality. so he added like 1% of reverb and exported it to wav. and it was now rendered as high quality. :)

  On 10/1/2014 at 12:31 PM, bitroast said:

 

  On 10/1/2014 at 12:12 PM, jasondonervan said:

There's a hefty FLAC download link on this 'unreleased Aphex' nonsense that FACT posted on April Fool's Day, same uploader:

 

http://youtu.be/tyQufYJEssY

 

Looking more and more like shifty shenanigans if you ask me

 

i remember back a while back, friend was trying to upload something to what(or oink, or whatever) and it was downloaded from myspace and kept getting rejected for being low quality. so he added like 1% of reverb and exported it to wav. and it was now rendered as high quality. :)

 

I want the blue one.

yeeeaaahhhh......

(i am wondering where he got the 1192x1192 analord 10 cover from though, looks like it's almost the original resolution)

  On 10/1/2014 at 1:06 PM, petina said:

 

yeeeaaahhhh......

 

(i am wondering where he got the 1192x1192 analord 10 cover from though, looks like it's almost the original resolution)

rephlex website had em along with Analord 1-11. I can up them later tonight / tomorrow if no one else does : )

  On 10/1/2014 at 1:14 PM, bitroast said:

 

  On 10/1/2014 at 1:06 PM, petina said:

 

yeeeaaahhhh......

 

(i am wondering where he got the 1192x1192 analord 10 cover from though, looks like it's almost the original resolution)

 

rephlex website had em along with Analord 1-11. I can up them later tonight / tomorrow if no one else does : )

 

ooh, yes please!!! i would love you forever

Wow, that's a long time.

high resolution art is important to me, you see

  On 10/1/2014 at 12:00 PM, Herr Jan said:

If that guy just converted the soundcloud low quality version into a wav or flac, then megalol. If not, how did this random person obtain it?

 

P.S. - don't forget that unreleased tracks like these also have copyright, so the same rules apply for sharing unreleased tracks on here.

lol - that's possible, it does to be strong to do that, but i know it's possible... Don't care the copyright if some titles are never offered for sale...

  On 10/1/2014 at 12:02 PM, jasondonervan said:

FLAC showing as 24bit...

 

lol - that's not possible... otherwise can u share it with me by PM?

  On 10/1/2014 at 1:32 PM, petina said:

high resolution art is important to me, you see

same thing for me! ;-)

Guys, i'm Ignisarchives i just record these tracks and turn them into various formats cuz i don't know shit. I'm serious. Can't say i hear a difference from the soundcloud version though. Can any of you explain what you're analyzing here so i know if it necessary at all to convert them to all these formats for my viewers or if i should just make MP3's from now on?

lol wut rly?

but a hearty YEAH to analord art from me as well! Upload that ish.

http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q76/Piggs01/Analord01.jpg

http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q76/Piggs01/Analord02.png

http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q76/Piggs01/Analord03.png

http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q76/Piggs01/Analord04.png

http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q76/Piggs01/Analord05.png

http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q76/Piggs01/Analord06.png

http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q76/Piggs01/Analord07.png

http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q76/Piggs01/Analord08.png

http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q76/Piggs01/Analord09.png

http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q76/Piggs01/Analord10.png

http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q76/Piggs01/Analord11.png

http://s133.photobucket.com/user/Piggs01/media/ConfederationTrough.png.html

http://s133.photobucket.com/user/Piggs01/media/RushupEdge.png.html

cheers, dude! i've been after these for ages

There's no ways these flacs could have been legit, it doesn't make sense that a random person would be in posession of w.i.p flacs. When is noyzelab going to drop the interview?

  On 10/1/2014 at 2:32 PM, Chalybs said:

Guys, i'm Ignisarchives i just record these tracks and turn them into various formats cuz i don't know shit. I'm serious. Can't say i hear a difference from the soundcloud version though. Can any of you explain what you're analyzing here so i know if it necessary at all to convert them to all these formats for my viewers or if i should just make MP3's from now on?

In my opinion, flac/wav is the way to go, because if you make mp3's out of an already lossy file then the lossy conversion will be done twice. But when you do share such files, the best thing is to put something like (soundcloud rip) or (lossy source) in the filename, so people don't go about sharing the files thinking they are legit lossless files.

If you're grabbing the audio file from soundcloud it's a 128 kbps mp3 and converting it to flac or wav is worse than pointless. All it will do is increase the file size.

  On 10/3/2014 at 1:26 PM, saikobjorn said:

 

  On 10/1/2014 at 2:32 PM, Chalybs said:

Guys, i'm Ignisarchives i just record these tracks and turn them into various formats cuz i don't know shit. I'm serious. Can't say i hear a difference from the soundcloud version though. Can any of you explain what you're analyzing here so i know if it necessary at all to convert them to all these formats for my viewers or if i should just make MP3's from now on?

In my opinion, flac/wav is the way to go, because if you make mp3's out of an already lossy file then the lossy conversion will be done twice. But when you do share such files, the best thing is to put something like (soundcloud rip) or (lossy source) in the filename, so people don't go about sharing the files thinking they are legit lossless files.

 

no... when you save the file from soundcloud you are saving a direct copy of the mp3 as it is on soundcloud. there is no secondary compression. re-saving it as flac/wav is pointless and will just bloat the file

Okay then! I didn't know you could get the mp3 file directly from soundcloud. Sorry about the misleading comment-