Richard D James SoundCloud - A Gift To The Fans

I dunno if they would give a shit about shit like that. It would help that they know each other as people, so unlike when we give a strong opinion about some ekt music on here and some emo munt takes it personally, at least with when they say stuff about each other's thing, there's a layer of 'oh, you guys', because they've met in real.

That said, it seemed rich was more emotionally attached to the perception of his music in the past, (of which there is a particular example I promised never to mention on here again), but has matured and is more circumspect about things now. Not knowing the guy, how can I really know this. And why have I sunk to daily mail gossip.

Also this ...

  On 1/1/2016 at 8:36 AM, delet... said:

We have to remember to renew his Soundcloud subscription.

richmusic is love

richmusic is life

  On 1/1/2016 at 1:03 PM, webby said:

I reckon there's all sorts of intelligent dance feuds going on. Wasn't there a zinger in there about how coding emotions is very difficult, pinging back a snide AE remark about how his music was cold and emotionless?

lol i remember that interview when they said that, it's kind of such a ridiculous statement that i would have a hard time believing ae weren't being sarcastic. not to be a total rdj fanboy but i mean really? his music lacking emotion? come on...you slags.

oh shit i made another post about idm emotionz

Emotions ! that's a slippery slope hahah !

/lays out cushions, herbal teas and puppy videos for watmm safe space (check out yo brain) room.

((this actually happened on a campus for a presentation that might trigger the audience, I'd have recommended gassing anyone that used the room, but probably a third of the people it attracted would have been stoners seeing it as a place to chill out and pick up vulnerable young ladies))

  On 12/30/2015 at 5:08 PM, jsmcpn said:

 

  On 12/30/2015 at 4:09 PM, Herr Jan said:

 

  On 12/30/2015 at 4:07 PM, Joyrex said:

 

  On 12/30/2015 at 3:44 PM, Herr Jan said:

We're getting this request on almost every page now. Maybe if someone can keep up a full archive link I can make a seperate pinned (and locked) thread for as long this goes on?

Or... should I ask permission to host the files for download here at WATMM? I've always avoided this as it is Richard's music and he decides what is and isn't available, etc., but it would be easier for the fans who missed out on the previous tracks.

 

Doesn't marking a thread "answered" pin it to the top of every sub-page in a thread? That would be another way.

That would be even better actually!

 

We tried the "answered" method a few times in this thread but for some reason it seems to disappear after a few pages / weeks. Not sure why!

 

 

  On 12/30/2015 at 4:47 PM, Joyrex said:

OK, no promises but I'll see if Richard will respond...

 

I like MEGA for this AFX Aventur because it is so easy to update as track descriptions and artwork change. Plus, people can sort on time stamp and grab only what is changed or new (as opposed to downloading a massive ZIP/RAR just to grab a few stragglers).

 

I've been maintaining this archive for WATMM-ites since the beginning, no plans to let it fall into disrepair (unless RDJ requests).

https://mega.nz/#F!HMcAgABI!TXaiAlHSGTno2ki_TuoJPQ

 

Thanks! ♥

  On 1/1/2016 at 8:47 PM, delet... said:

Emotions ! that's a slippery slope hahah !

 

 

/lays out cushions, herbal teas and puppy videos for watmm safe space (check out yo brain) room.

 

((this actually happened on a campus for a presentation that might trigger the audience, I'd have recommended gassing anyone that used the room, but probably a third of the people it attracted would have been stoners seeing it as a place to chill out and pick up vulnerable young ladies))

we should have a watmm safe space thread

EDIT: and just so we have every slight change of the sc recorded in this thread his prof now says "dj ultimate cunt". omg new release imminent, "another 26 mixes for cash"

  On 1/1/2016 at 8:47 PM, delet... said:

Emotions ! that's a slippery slope hahah !

 

 

/lays out cushions, herbal teas and puppy videos for watmm safe space (check out yo brain) room.

 

((this actually happened on a campus for a presentation that might trigger the audience, I'd have recommended gassing anyone that used the room, but probably a third of the people it attracted would have been stoners seeing it as a place to chill out and pick up vulnerable young ladies))

Lets talk about our emotions

https://youtu.be/MnqM4YsADjY

Ahh troutman, when he's on point it's killa. I felt the opposite of emotion listening to that song, well skimming it, lets be real boe.

That grid of diamonds. Did he sprain his finger getting it into the pic? I'm feeling emotions, out loud.

So many memories with this soundcloud ruckus...

Thanks AFX

u rule

^__^

DJ Ultimate Cunt

Dubstep concept album imminent?

the yt track audio is different. it sounds like letters and 1 word maybe oaessexrichard[day]jaymes? or is it oaessexrichard[date]aaymes? 0aeffe hex?

https://soundcloud.com/user18081971/uchoob-links

drunk robot

  On 1/1/2016 at 1:03 PM, webby said:

 

  On 12/31/2015 at 11:37 PM, delet... said:

 

  On 12/31/2015 at 11:26 PM, Bubba69 said:

I love aphex talking shit about squarepusher. first the robots album, then about him putting the crowd noises in his tracks. I hope they get into a feud of some kind. Reason being I think it would result in some really good music being released.

?

 

I reckon there's all sorts of intelligent dance feuds going on. Wasn't there a zinger in there about how coding emotions is very difficult, pinging back a snide AE remark about how his music was cold and emotionless?

 

west coast east coast ventriloquist feud

  On 1/2/2016 at 2:28 PM, Ragnar said:

west coast east coast ventriloquist feud

the west coast is the better of the two coasts...

beast coast > best coast

beef coats > zest cots

2015 - Year of the #likeafx Soundcloud dump

2016 - Rise of the DJ ultimate cunt bandcamp account

  On 1/2/2016 at 4:34 PM, caze said:

 

  On 1/2/2016 at 2:28 PM, Ragnar said:

west coast east coast ventriloquist feud

 

the west coast is the better of the two coasts...

Until the mega quake.

  On 1/2/2016 at 8:46 PM, delet... said:

 

  On 1/2/2016 at 4:34 PM, caze said:

 

  On 1/2/2016 at 2:28 PM, Ragnar said:

west coast east coast ventriloquist feud

the west coast is the better of the two coasts...

Until the mega quake.

 

"Gun control.

Just remember, the U.S government and media are making the people ask the wrong questions, as they usually do.
The question should not be ’should normal citizens should have guns or not’ but should be ‘is it ok for the controlling forces to have guns and the controlled to not have guns’
your being tricked.

If I was a U.S citizen id say yes ok have my guns on one condition NOBODY is allowed to be armed, this is the action of a truly peaceful nation.
Don't be fooled.
In the UK were screwed in some ways because the people are mostly unarmed but were under the illusion the police force is unarmed, which is not true, they have plenty of guns when they need them and they have been slowly but surely putting them on display more and more, while the gun laws over the citizens gets tighter and tighter. This is sold to us by reminding us there is less gun crime, its a fucking joke.
The police have shot innocent people down in cold blood plenty of times.
But thats ok isnt it becuase they are the police?

Why do you think it is that Obama has been told to talk about how many citizens were killed by other citizens but not about how many citizens were killed by police?

Please remember Im sticking my fucking neck out in the name of whats fair for all of us saying these things, so play nicely please, cheers."

very true imho

  On 1/3/2016 at 12:08 AM, D4M0 said:

"Gun control.

Just remember, the U.S government and media are making the people ask the wrong questions, as they usually do.

The question should not be should normal citizens should have guns or not but should be is it ok for the controlling forces to have guns and the controlled to not have guns

your being tricked.

If I was a U.S citizen id say yes ok have my guns on one condition NOBODY is allowed to be armed, this is the action of a truly peaceful nation.

Don't be fooled.

In the UK were screwed in some ways because the people are mostly unarmed but were under the illusion the police force is unarmed, which is not true, they have plenty of guns when they need them and they have been slowly but surely putting them on display more and more, while the gun laws over the citizens gets tighter and tighter. This is sold to us by reminding us there is less gun crime, its a fucking joke.

The police have shot innocent people down in cold blood plenty of times.

But thats ok isnt it becuase they are the police?

Why do you think it is that Obama has been told to talk about how many citizens were killed by other citizens but not about how many citizens were killed by police?

Please remember Im sticking my fucking neck out in the name of whats fair for all of us saying these things, so play nicely please, cheers."

 

very true imho

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly_on_violence

  On 1/2/2016 at 4:34 PM, caze said:

 

  On 1/2/2016 at 2:28 PM, Ragnar said:

west coast east coast ventriloquist feud

the west coast is the better of the two coasts...

says Professor Pickles

  On 1/3/2016 at 12:08 AM, D4M0 said:

"Gun control.

Just remember, the U.S government and media are making the people ask the wrong questions, as they usually do.

The question should not be should normal citizens should have guns or not but should be is it ok for the controlling forces to have guns and the controlled to not have guns

your being tricked.

If I was a U.S citizen id say yes ok have my guns on one condition NOBODY is allowed to be armed, this is the action of a truly peaceful nation.

Don't be fooled.

In the UK were screwed in some ways because the people are mostly unarmed but were under the illusion the police force is unarmed, which is not true, they have plenty of guns when they need them and they have been slowly but surely putting them on display more and more, while the gun laws over the citizens gets tighter and tighter. This is sold to us by reminding us there is less gun crime, its a fucking joke.

The police have shot innocent people down in cold blood plenty of times.

But thats ok isnt it becuase they are the police?

Why do you think it is that Obama has been told to talk about how many citizens were killed by other citizens but not about how many citizens were killed by police?

Please remember Im sticking my fucking neck out in the name of whats fair for all of us saying these things, so play nicely please, cheers."

 

 

very true imho

Just to help a brother out and show solidarity.

Stats based refutation of the guns equals crime argument, in fact more armed citizens means less crime, I know this may not 'feel' right to those that have for so long taken it as a given that guns are bad, but there you go, when new information comes along don't be scared of it, take it on board, adjust your position and move on. Personally, and I think many independent minded people think the same now, our trust in government has never been lower, it's moving in a totalitarian direction, and if I could be armed I would be, as it would make governments think twice before going off the deep end. Remember throughout history, before becoming totalitarian most of those regimes disarmed their populations. Think about that as we shift from we the people to being run by edict from a set of commissars.

http://youtu.be/8hyQDQPEsrs

There are plenty of vids online addressing this issue, including an earlier one by molyneux which digs through territory this one doesn't. Yes molyneux has some tedious views, but he's good at this type of thing so that's why I used his vid. I do recommend his 'truth about' series, just parse out the biases. [-;

  On 1/3/2016 at 1:01 AM, delet... said:

 

  On 1/3/2016 at 12:08 AM, D4M0 said:

"Gun control.
Just remember, the U.S government and media are making the people ask the wrong questions, as they usually do.
The question should not be should normal citizens should have guns or not but should be is it ok for the controlling forces to have guns and the controlled to not have guns
your being tricked.
If I was a U.S citizen id say yes ok have my guns on one condition NOBODY is allowed to be armed, this is the action of a truly peaceful nation.
Don't be fooled.
In the UK were screwed in some ways because the people are mostly unarmed but were under the illusion the police force is unarmed, which is not true, they have plenty of guns when they need them and they have been slowly but surely putting them on display more and more, while the gun laws over the citizens gets tighter and tighter. This is sold to us by reminding us there is less gun crime, its a fucking joke.
The police have shot innocent people down in cold blood plenty of times.
But thats ok isnt it becuase they are the police?
Why do you think it is that Obama has been told to talk about how many citizens were killed by other citizens but not about how many citizens were killed by police?
Please remember Im sticking my fucking neck out in the name of whats fair for all of us saying these things, so play nicely please, cheers."


very true imho

Stats based refutation of the guns equals crime argument

 

Lets see the stats/studies please.