autechre back-catalogue vinyl reissues imminent?

  On 8/23/2015 at 12:49 PM, modey said:

quaristice versions/quadrange vinyl version omg pls

That's all I really want in life. Quadrange is what Quaristice should have been.

It would suit The Plc Ccc sooo well to be on a side of crackly wax

  On 8/23/2015 at 10:54 PM, hello spiral said:

It would suit The Plc Ccc sooo well to be on a side of crackly wax

Damn right. I think it would be a good idea to just omit Perlence Subrange 6-36, though, so it doesn't have to be a big 4-disc box like Exai. There really isn't any point to putting that track on vinyl, anyway.

agreed

disagreed.

Nah mang, I learned the hard way when I bought Sleep's Dopesmoker on vinyl.

Album length tracks are a chore and not effective to listen to on vinyl.

Aye, has anyone got the disintegration loops on vinyl - am I right in thinking one track is split over four sides ?!

yeah fuck that - i even think the CDs of well-tuned piano and music in 12 parts sucks - so great to be able to listen seamlessly for 4 hours at FLAC quality. beautiful.

  On 8/26/2015 at 10:39 PM, mcbpete said:

Aye, has anyone got the disintegration loops on vinyl - am I right in thinking one track is split over four sides ?!

checked discogs out of curiosity, dlp 1.1 and 5 are split over 3 sides each

they could digitally speed up subrange 6-36 by 4 times, cut it for 64 rpm on one side so we could play it back by slowing it down 4 times and still remaining some fidelity, cause there's little going on above 10k on the track anyway...

  On 8/21/2015 at 5:01 PM, Joyrex said:

^ Well that obviously hasn't happened, LOL

 

It would be nice (similar to what they did with the EPs) to collect all the albums into a box set...

 

Oh, damn, there's those ellipsis again...

I think that would be way too expensive and counterintuitive to what the core audience wants/needs

but, you know...

  On 8/26/2015 at 11:16 PM, xox said:

they could digitally speed up subrange 6-36 by 4 times, cut it for 64 rpm on one side so we could play it back by slowing it down 4 times and still remaining some fidelity, cause there's little going on above 10k on the track anyway...

Post of the day award!

It could probably fit at 33rpm anyway.. I'm not at home to check, but I'm pretty sure the b-side of ovalprocess is 50mins long or something. It could just be cut really quietly, perhaps?

  On 8/26/2015 at 11:16 PM, xox said:

they could digitally speed up subrange 6-36 by 4 times, cut it for 64 rpm on one side so we could play it back by slowing it down 4 times and still remaining some fidelity, cause there's little going on above 10k on the track anyway...

I was thinking of something similar.

I can get +/- 20% pitch on my decks, but I can also play at 78rpm so its possible for me :)

  On 8/28/2015 at 2:04 AM, modey said:

It could probably fit at 33rpm anyway.. I'm not at home to check, but I'm pretty sure the b-side of ovalprocess is 50mins long or something. It could just be cut really quietly, perhaps?

How the hell do you do that? I've never seen that before. I thought the SAW II vinyl release was pushing the boundaries, but this is ridiculous.

  On 8/28/2015 at 2:04 AM, modey said:

It could probably fit at 33rpm anyway.. I'm not at home to check, but I'm pretty sure the b-side of ovalprocess is 50mins long or something. It could just be cut really quietly, perhaps?

seriously?

http://www.discogs.com/Oval-Ovalprocess/release/87744

*47 minutes on the b-side

holy shit weird, nobody presses sides that long anymore. it used to be fairly normal with old classical music but its just virtually unheard of this day in age. i should listen to it again to see how it holds up (not the album because its one of my favorites but just the vinyl vers)

Yeah I'll check it out when I have the time. I don't remember it sounding bad or anything

http://us7.campaign-archive1.com/?u=92da423b0a560b89a4b558a36&id=2b05700ae9&e=ebdd75a7f6

BOP!

I'v gone all giddy

Three of my favourites.