Yugoslavian Computer Magazine Cover Girls of the 1980s-90s

Oktobar 92 plzzz

  On 1/7/2017 at 2:29 AM, delet... said:

 

  On 1/6/2017 at 11:44 PM, Schlitze said:

You may find them strangely arousing, but the reality is they are old ladies now, and acknowledging that would be a boner killer for most, unless you turn a blind eye to that. Hells bells, they were no spring chickens back in the day. They'll be in their 60's and70's now.

When I look at hentai I don't acknowledge that it is in fact, the creation of some sweaty underpaid manga-ka, so I think my suspension of disbelief is good enough order for this not to be a wang "killer".

 

Well, if you have power of the mind strong enough to suspend disbelief to reach climax over hentai then you have strong concentration levels, you are lost in that moment, crouched over the computer. Back in 2000 a school friend wanked over the thought of actresses Nicole Kidman, Uma Thurman, Gwynnie, Claudia Schiffer, etc. but as they got older he shuffled the pack and went into new up and comers, he kept changing them up, in his mind the current state of the actresses played heavy on his mind. Hentai is different in that sense, delete, unlike your dick it doesn't become worn over time. The women in those computer mags have gone through wars and hardship in the time since those photos were taken, and they will likely be aged more than their years.

And the salary of the hentai artist shouldn't feature in your post cum guilt.

cant help but think this kind of objectification is to blame for the lack of women in computer science

Blame god for not blessing them with autism.

wang computer deactivated

  On 1/7/2017 at 10:07 PM, span said:

cant help but think this kind of objectification is to blame for the lack of women in computer science

could you please help me to those mathematics magazines with objectified women on the cover? fold out middle section is good too. or anything else technical. thank you! :-*

  On 1/7/2017 at 10:31 PM, goDel said:

 

  On 1/7/2017 at 10:07 PM, span said:

cant help but think this kind of objectification is to blame for the lack of women in computer science

 

could you please help me to those mathematics magazines with objectified women on the cover? fold out middle section is good too. or anything else technical. thank you! :-*

 

don't know exactly what you're implying, since the gender ratio in mathematics degrees is way more balanced than in engineering and compsci (source: personal experience + 5 minutes of google)

either way that's not the point. I'm not saying that women objectification (not only in obscure european magazines, but in PC advertising overall etc etc) and the media portraying compsci as a Strictly 4 M.E.N. thing in general is solely to blame for the lack of women in CS fields, but it surely mustve played a part in that.

(also I dont even enjoy this from a purely a e s t h e t i c point of view, but I dont think theres nothing wrong that if you do)

@span: read hoodies post. She makes a great point

The thing about objectification of women on the covers of magazines (or men for that matter) is almost irrelevant. It's everywhere. And as a free counter example to your hypothesis: fashion is all about objectification of women (and men), but that doesn't seem to scare women away. In a way, the premium source of the objectification of women are womens magazines, ironically. Havent seen many covers of womens magazines without a woman.

Really, a couple of women on the covers of some pc magazine is not a big deal. Except that the subtext might be that its kind of an exception to have women on the cover of some computer magazine, instead of the norm.

Please look elsewhere for explanations of why there arent more women in engineering/compsci. Hell, I could even argue the opposite: if you'd want to attract more women into doing engineering/compsci, you'd need more women on the (proverbial) covers to make it more sociable toward women. (Implying there's a distinction between positive and negative objectification)

this is why it's called object-oriented programming

I think the gender bias in information technology has more to do with viewing technology as an unfeminine and masculine subject.

Case in point

I studied at a university where you could get an MSc in information technology from two different departments. Basically you could study to be a programmer from either one.

So, one was the computer science department in the natural science faculty. If you chose that path you would have lots of front-end design, SW design theory, even things from the business end of the spectrum. About 50% of students were female.

The other one was the engineering faculty. If you chose that path then you would have electronics, embedded SW design, lots mathematics, mandatory physics courses, control and systems theory. Less that 10% of students were female.

And I don't think it's the mathematics creating the bias because I studied also pure theoretical mathematics, like group theory, and there were more women than men as students. Then when I hit the cryptography course the women just disappeared even though it was the same theoretical stuff most of the time.

  On 1/7/2017 at 10:25 PM, doublename said:

Blame god for not blessing them with autism.

10/10