AI Art

this gives me stock image vibes but it’s beautiful nonetheless 

creeple 

credit: MetaKnowing

lol I really like this one 

The more you look at it the less it makes sense 

I was playing around with some creepy thing I generated and then I accidentally the Vic Acid 

EDIT: the whole vic acid

credit: Richard Nadler

"AI" "Art" is neither AI, nor art.

credit: Obeca

credit: Mac BaconAi

this is shit. have some humanity for chrissakes

You're becoming your ingredients again
 

This is what you want, this is what you get

credit: Mac BaconAi

all of that sucks

  On 11/18/2024 at 8:05 PM, mushroom said:

all of that sucks

ok then, put up or shut up.

  On 11/18/2024 at 8:43 PM, Rubin Farr said:

ok then, put up or shut up.

put up what? i denounce the very concept of this thread. to post this garbage is an affront to art, an enterprise that requires a thinking entity that experiences things to put some aspect of those experiences into it. an algorithm cannot think or experience anything, and so any "art" it produces is going to be an uncanny combinatorial slurry. conflating an algorithm running on a server rack with human intelligence will be one of humanity's biggest mistakes.

  On 11/18/2024 at 8:58 PM, mushroom said:

put up what? i denounce the very concept of this thread. to post this garbage is an affront to art, an enterprise that requires a thinking entity that experiences things to put some aspect of those experiences into it. an algorithm cannot think or experience anything, and so any "art" it produces is going to be an uncanny combinatorial slurry. conflating an algorithm running on a server rack with human intelligence will be one of humanity's biggest mistakes.

If you disapprove of this thread, then there’s no need to troll it. Have a great day.  

trolling implies insincerity

credit FB: If Seinfeld was set in Portland

  On 11/18/2024 at 8:58 PM, mushroom said:

put up what? i denounce the very concept of this thread. to post this garbage is an affront to art, an enterprise that requires a thinking entity that experiences things to put some aspect of those experiences into it. an algorithm cannot think or experience anything, and so any "art" it produces is going to be an uncanny combinatorial slurry. conflating an algorithm running on a server rack with human intelligence will be one of humanity's biggest mistakes.

It makes me feel weird too but then again that banana taped to the wall sold for 6 million and that made me feel more weird and tbh I don't count much of picasso as valuable art (blue period excepted) never mind Rothko, but I do think the arrangement in vases of flowers taking by my mum out of her garden is.

What's binary for "the eye of the beholder"?

Picasso's periods are like the history of diffusion models in reverse