IAMAMIWHOAMI

you've got your ciphers figured out wrong. my calculations are as follows:

VIDEO #1: Prelude 699130082.451322-5.4.21.3.1.20.9.15.14.1.12

6(+)9(+)9(+)1(+)3(+)0(+)0(+)8(+)2 . 4(+)5(+)1(+)3(+)2(+)2 = 38.17 = CH.AG (= CHristina.AGuilera ?)

5.4.21.3.1.20.9.15.14.1.12 = E.D.U.C.A.T.I.O.N.A.L

add it together and you get: Prelude CH.AG-E.D.U.C.A.T.I.O.N.A.L

VIDEO #2: 9.1.13.669321018

9.1.13. = I.A.M.

6(+)6(+)9(+)3(+)2(+)1(+)0(+)1(+)8 = 36 = CF (no idea what CF could mean, as of yet)

add it together and you get: I.A.M.CF

VIDEO #3: 9.20.19.13.5.723378

9.20.19.13.5. = I.T.S.M.E.

7(+)2(+)3(+)3(+)7(+)8 = 30 = C_

add it together and you get: I.T.S.M.E.C_ (seems to be teasing us with the letter C here and below)

VIDEO #4: 13.1.14.4.18.1.7.15.18.1.1110

13.1.14.4.18.1.7.15.18.1.1(+)1(+)1(+)0 = M.A.N.D.R.A.G.O.R.A.C

the person seems to be signing the messages with the letter C each time

dont know who this is, dont care...its pretty interesting

alright, that fetal video is pretty awesome.

if this is christina..i might have to buy one of her albums.

I for one am glad Xtina is taking the "Dirrty" aesthetic more seriously this time.

alright, i keep playing that fetus video over and over...that is going to be a badass track

btw if this turns out to be lady gaga i am going to commit suicide.

fuckin hell i cant stop listening to that one fetus track....amazing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OL7xWAkOKV0

heres christina looking pretty skinny...might be her?

i cant believe that's her....

honestly i always thought it would be cool for a popstar to record two albums or whatever to pander to the lowest common denominator, and then whip out some shit like this...though i feel like it might be too good to be true

goddamn that fetus video is amazing though

the production style of those things really ring a bell on me.

  On 2/14/2010 at 7:56 AM, tibbar said:

VIDEO #1: Prelude 699130082.451322-5.4.21.3.1.20.9.15.14.1.12

 

6(+)9(+)9(+)1(+)3(+)0(+)0(+)8(+)2 . 4(+)5(+)1(+)3(+)2(+)2 = 38.17 = CH.AG (= CHristina.AGuilera ?)

5.4.21.3.1.20.9.15.14.1.12 = E.D.U.C.A.T.I.O.N.A.L

 

add it together and you get: Prelude CH.AG-E.D.U.C.A.T.I.O.N.A.L

 

 

 

VIDEO #2: 9.1.13.669321018

 

9.1.13. = I.A.M.

6(+)6(+)9(+)3(+)2(+)1(+)0(+)1(+)8 = 36 = 3(+)6 = 9 = I

 

add it together and you get: I.A.M.I

 

 

 

VIDEO #3: 9.20.19.13.5.723378

 

9.20.19.13.5. = I.T.S.M.E.

7(+)2(+)3(+)3(+)7(+)8 = 30 = 3(+)0 = C

 

add it together and you get: I.T.S.M.E.C (seems to be teasing us with the letter C here and below)

 

 

 

VIDEO #4: 13.1.14.4.18.1.7.15.18.1.1110

 

13.1.14.4.18.1.7.15.18.1.1(+)1(+)1(+)0 = M.A.N.D.R.A.G.O.R.A.C

fixed my calculations. i knew that CF thing was wrong somehow. hahaha that was bugging me.

it's probably boc

New BOC = Xtina collab, epic.

if it is BOC they've made something i am willing to buy since Music has the Right.

  On 2/14/2010 at 7:56 AM, tibbar said:

the person seems to be signing the messages with the letter C each time

It's Courtney Love. I mean, there is supposed to be a new Hole record out, right?

It's not Christina the trailer for her new album is here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOiYdVjU7HI

Strike that, lol it is CHristina

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0DVQZpXBD0

Both of those tracks have one thing in common - compression. Holy fuck especially in the first video...

I would love some dynamics in music again.

both of those videos are from fans. they don't confirm anything.

seems most likely though with the link that someone posted to an image on the sony website with her name in the url.

It'll be funny seeing her fans react to this though, as it's a little bit of a departure from standard pop twaddle. (note the "little bit", I do really mean a little bit)

if this happens it will be what i have been waiting for in pop music for quite sometime, some pretty cookie cutter pop singer to completely overturn conventional pop music...bjork did it albeit on a much smaller scale.

if this is christina, mad respect....id have trouble liking the decision if it was Lady Gaga, because she MAKES her presence on the shallow ability to counter a market on "weird but admirable"

I don't see much reason to enthuse just yet. How much audio do we really have by now? I'm not even really digging it but either way who would buy an album based on this? And the very last bit of the most recent vid looks like it could still erupt into something terribly shitty.

i would buy it assuming the fetus track maintains its awesomeness.

  On 2/15/2010 at 7:44 PM, Smettingham Rutherford IV said:

i would buy it assuming the fetus track maintains its awesomeness.

lol I love your enthusiasm for the "fetus track". That's the swimming one, right?

Gets stuck in my head too. So good.

People kept saying she has something written on her knee at 0:28. I can't seem to make it out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVVLkWjTISE

Also:

A cool thing about Pink and Christina is that they both have had a great friend in Linda Perry. And she has really encouraged them to branch out in everything they do. Whether image wise, or sound wise. There were a few tracks on Stripped that were very cool, and loose just messing around in the studio tracks that certainly made her come across as a lot more serious artist that does her own thing and really enjoyed it and knew how to have fun with it. Instead of "are we done for the day? I've got a jeep to go beat with an umbrella".

edit: ella ella ella eh eh

lol, i do not like rihanna.

so where did the rumor that its christina aguilera originate from?

I'm not too sure. But I assume it was people seeing a tiny blonde girl, with the sounds of something very similar to goldfrapp, at a time when she would be doing promotion for her upcoming album.