Inception - Chris Nolan + Leo DiCaprio = best movie of the summer?

  On 12/13/2010 at 3:00 PM, Terpentintollwut said:

  On 12/13/2010 at 4:15 AM, vasio said:

The South Park episode was really good, they totally nailed the weak action in Inception and the dramatic music lol.

 

http://www.southparkstudios.com/full-episodes/s14e10-insheeption

 

Ha I should have known they were gonna make an episode about it, I'm so looking forward to watching it

That episode was fucking hilarious, and I enjoyed Inception.

  On 12/13/2010 at 4:58 PM, Jackson Michaels said:

.

At times it reminded me of a video game. I suppose the kids love that.

yea, especially the snow scene. reminded me of goldeneye a lot. i bet they make this a video game.

  On 12/13/2010 at 4:58 PM, Jackson Michaels said:

.

"Dude, did you see that? There's not two, but three levels of dreaming. OMG"

it was like 5 levels duuuuude.

  On 12/13/2010 at 5:08 PM, Jackson Michaels said:

To be fair to Mr. Affleck, he did actually co-write Good Will Hunting.

 

Still, I think you get my point.

yea i am calling bs on that. there is no way those two wrote that movie. what have they written before and since? nothing. it was bs to get buzz and an oscar. and it worked.

  On 12/13/2010 at 4:29 PM, dr lopez said:

lol but seriously guys i need some video or text proof. got into a huge argument with my friend. I thought they explained that when juno got real pissed at leo being all like "hey man that wasn't cool you bringing that train in hurr," but i could be wrong.

my understanding was when Leo finally convinced Mal to leave their dream world (before she committed suicide in the "real" world), they snapped themselves out of limbo by putting their heads on a train track together. What a weird way to go, seems terrifying, but oh-so-cinematic. Hence the reason why trains keep popping up in Leo's dreams (during the elevator sequence, car chase...)

  On 12/13/2010 at 5:08 PM, Jackson Michaels said:

To be fair to Mr. Affleck, he did actually co-write Good Will Hunting.

 

Still, I think you get my point.

phantoms like a mufucker

Just watched it for the second time.

  On 12/13/2010 at 11:26 PM, jules said:

 

 

 

 

 

  On 12/13/2010 at 5:08 PM, Jackson Michaels said:

To be fair to Mr. Affleck, he did actually co-write Good Will Hunting.

 

Still, I think you get my point.

 

 

yea i am calling bs on that. there is no way those two wrote that movie. what have they written before and since? nothing. it was bs to get buzz and an oscar. and it worked.

I dunno, Ben Affleck directed "gone baby gone" and I thought that was pretty decent. And apparently he did the screenplay for it too (according to imdb). So it's entirely possible.

  On 12/22/2010 at 6:57 AM, jefferoo said:

Just watched it for the second time.

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

I now think the story is very straightforward and ends with Cobb stuck in limbo.

You never see him rescue Saito and the top doesn't stop.

Also, at the end, the dreamlike camerawork suggests that he is in a dream.

It's also just too happy of an ending.

The odds were pretty bad. He just let Mol talk him into some stupid ass shit.

Good times.

 

 

they way the movie is made, it doesn't even matter.

wow that South Park episode was extremely bad, sometimes when they just do these weird paint by numbers total parodies it amounts to near zero laughs. I haven't seen a South Park that cringe worthy since perhaps the Oprah vag vs ass conversation episode. the guys really shit these episodes out *fast* sometimes

  On 12/5/2010 at 9:56 PM, mafted said:

damn, that was perfect. ok , yea so i was a little harsh, the media just tires me with how things are hyped.

lol watmm is just a bunch of faggots. hollywood movies aren't always bad. and fucking shame on you for critiquing a movie you haven't even seen. wtf.

  On 12/22/2010 at 7:51 PM, GORDO said:

they way the movie is made, it doesn't even matter.

just watched the first 10 or so minutes. breaks many of the basic rules of story telling, well the ones that matter. And then i persevered ...

I don't think that this film will be remembered, and if it is, not fondly. The editing is atrocious, perhaps the plot mattered but that was lost on the editing floor.

it's all pretty obvious from the get go btw, well unless you're neanderthal dumb or a fuckwit stoner.

btw .. you would hate watching films with me, i used to have a cinephile mate, and i'd pick key plot points and point out the film direction before anything had happened like a psychic, for anyone that wasn't attuned to the bloody obvious.

so i'll repeat, hollywood is mostly rubbish, and i go to films to be entertained not 'illuminated'. Get that right and you won't endure my ire.

  On 1/2/2011 at 7:28 PM, delet... said:

just watched the first 10 or so minutes. breaks many of the basic rules of story telling, well the ones that matter. And then i persevered ...

 

I don't think that this film will be remembered, and if it is, not fondly. The editing is atrocious, perhaps the plot mattered but that was lost on the editing floor.

 

it's all pretty obvious from the get go btw, well unless you're neanderthal dumb or a fuckwit stoner.

am i only one of them or both?

  On 12/22/2010 at 8:08 PM, KY said:

  On 12/5/2010 at 9:56 PM, mafted said:

damn, that was perfect. ok , yea so i was a little harsh, the media just tires me with how things are hyped.

lol watmm is just a bunch of faggots. hollywood movies aren't always bad. and fucking shame on you for critiquing a movie you haven't even seen. wtf.

 

  On 12/22/2010 at 7:51 PM, GORDO said:

they way the movie is made, it doesn't even matter.

sorry, fag, i had definitely seen the movie upon agreeing with said hilarious video. bugger off, putz.

is it possible to close this topic? i feel like i am at imdb.com or in the youtube comments section.

it is possible to leave however

  On 1/2/2011 at 7:51 PM, Smettingham Rutherford IV said:

imdb.com

  On 1/2/2011 at 7:52 PM, THIS IS MICHAEL JACKSON said:

it is possible to leave however

upon seeing this movie a second time it is definitely over rated..

i think part of why its enjoyable the first time is that your brain is trying to piece together the plot as it goes and youre thinking about what all these rules mean and how they are playing out the way they are... but the second time there is none of that, so its just a really boring action movie.

2nd time???

do you realize you wasted about 5 hours of your life??

you could be fapping

  On 1/2/2011 at 8:47 PM, Smettingham Rutherford IV said:

imdb.com

9.0/10

  On 1/4/2011 at 5:55 PM, vincentvc said:

Oh come on, give me a fucking break. I hate shit like this, it's not even complicated!

It makes it look more confusing than it actually is.

  On 1/4/2011 at 6:09 PM, azatoth said:

It makes it look more confusing than it actually is.

Exactly!

Sorry, but Inception is not a complex film. If you require a diagram like that to get it then you're a fucking dolt.

Yeah, I think we can all agree that the diagram is making it look much more complicated than it actually is.

Also, wtf. He never wakes up from testing the drugs in Mombasa. Why hasn't everyone agreed on this yet? He tests the drugs, has a scary encounter with Mal trying to stab him, "wakes" up and rushes to the bathroom, splashes his face and spins his totem. Saito interrupts him before the totem stops spinning and he never spins it again until the end of the film...

Anyway, I've seen it twice now, and it was nowhere near as good the second time. I must have been trying to enjoy it even more whilst in the cinema and paying. It's good, but not great. Actually probably just decent.

  On 1/4/2011 at 5:55 PM, vincentvc said:

LOL. good one

FINALLY got around to watching inception; i dunno how nolan does it. despite my analytical mind screaming plot hole every ten minutes or so, that was some mindblowing shit. that being said - cillian murphy: awesome. ellen page: BEYOND fucking awesome. leo dicaprio: a shitty actor.