Jump to content

Recommended Posts

When i left the cinema there were two guys wearing Alien t-shirts that were angry and loud, fucking Ridley Scott off to hell.

 

-- --

 

I can't see Awe's facial expression but i assume his head is about to explode in anger because he is passionately criticizing a movie on a internet forum..you don't do that unless you are so angry that you need to blow off some steam.

Edited by YO303
  On 6/10/2012 at 12:49 AM, compson said:
  On 6/10/2012 at 12:06 AM, auxien said:

the criticizing of advertising for this movie doesn't much count, because Scott's own company did a large part (if not all) of the advertising. it's not like Scott handed over a gorgeous diamond and the big bad studio shit on it until it was worthless....Scott is part of the big bad studio here. like Lindelof said in that interview he did on The Verge, this movie is all Scott. he directed the writing in large part, and of course directing, producing, etc. he's to praise or to blame here, mostly.

 

Criticizing advertising always counts because the inherent structure of advertising/trailers does a disservice to the film unless its purely new content, like those viral videos which were cool. Just because Scott had control over the edit of the trailer doesn't mean he could have not made one.

 

Unless you think trailers enrich the film somehow, I don't see how my point of view on this is controversial. After ones sees the film, whatever opinion you have is valid, but one has to question how our culture of advertising negatively affects the experience... seems there is a trade off to ensure profitability.

 

i agree that with most sequels and the like, advertising by giving away the plot does a disservice to the film. the viral videos were cool, that would've been all i needed to see before the film and i'd have been guaranteed a seat in the theater. but most viewers aren't you me and the other million Alien franchise fans...at least some portion has to be newcomers. Scott knows that and the studio knows that. hence, the bombardment the week or two before release of 'normal' advertisements. of course it's not cool. i don't remember the last time i went and saw a movie based SOLELY on tv ads. seriously, cannot remember. but i'm not Joe Schmoe. they didn't have to try for your dollar or mine or any other franchise-fan....all they had to say was Ridley Scott is making a Prequel to the Alien Movies...we gave him 200 Million Dollars to do it, this is the release date. they could've sent me a text saying just that and i'd have enjoyed the film just as much, if not more. but that's not why they advertise the fuck out of it with plot points and pretty shots and loud BVVVRRRUMMMPPPSSS in the trailers. that's just how movies out of Hollywood are advertised. i try not to complain anymore because it does no fucking good dude. none at all. just watch the movie and enjoy it for what it is.

Don't get the intro. What did that have to do with the rest of the film?

through the years, a man peoples a space with images of provinces, kingdoms, mountains, bays, ships, islands, fishes, rooms, tools, stars, horses and people. shortly before his death, he discovers that the patient labyrinth of lines traces the image of his own face.

Guest zaphod
  On 6/9/2012 at 8:10 PM, Awepittance said:

and hoodie im with you on being sickened by a bladerunner prequel, in fact now i'm sickened by any prequel to any good movie. Why on earth does hollywood keep making prequels? They are all terrible, they really are. About the only prequel i can stomach is Temple of Doom. I dont count Batman Begins a prequel, thats a reboot and its ok.

 

prequels are inherently flawed and i think the people who think they are doing a service to the original movie have too big of egos to realize how devastating what they are doing is.

 

if i hear one more asshole say the reason the new star wars prequels look super clean and shiny is because 'the empire ran everything down' later on i will seriously punch that person in the throat.

 

edit: also did anyone find as i did that the mysterious varieties of 'goo' coming out of the vases at the first interaction with them, was far more 'alien' and creepy than any of the actual fully manifested alien creatures? Ridley promised 'biomechanoid' but we got clunky plush like white buff dudes and slimey alien Ressurection style proto xenomorphs varieties, the only biomechanoid aesthetic was in that goo, and then it was over really quickly

 

while i agree with everything you're saying, there is one thing to note. they keep making this shit because you, the fanboy who gets his panties wet at every last morsel of info available before a movie even has a trailer, pays to see these films. i refuse to see prometheus after reading about it on this board and seeing the reviews. it sounds like shit. i'm not paying to watch that, and i absolutely don't want to contribute to the potential funding of any of these prequels, sequels or reboots that a creatively bankrupt industry continues to produce. i'll stay at home and watch aliens on blu ray, or read a book, or go out and interact with people whose lives don't revolve around consuming every last piece of product put in front of them that they can forget about as soon as next thing is released. the data gathering culture that seems to have sprung up in the last decade is mind boggling in its basic drive to consume everything in its path without a fucking clue as to how to be satisfied by any of it. maybe that's what happens when the nerds win and start running things. you get people like lindelof and jj abrams who are masters at self promotion and marketing, the tease of a childhood memory that can be exploited, but lack the artistic integrity and breadth of experience to pull it together into a coherent statement about anything that matters. or maybe it really is about a bottom line.

the musical score was really disctracting. for me it was the biggest flaw of the movie. it felt generic and overblown.

well ok, i just read up on the intro on XENOPEDIA.

 

i guess i get it. whatever. how vague.

 

I just hope the sequel is basically Avatar. They are blue. Bet they have big muscle dicks. Noomi can show off her muscle boobs and we can see some muscle dick. Can't wait.

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Edited by thanks robert moses

through the years, a man peoples a space with images of provinces, kingdoms, mountains, bays, ships, islands, fishes, rooms, tools, stars, horses and people. shortly before his death, he discovers that the patient labyrinth of lines traces the image of his own face.

  On 6/10/2012 at 6:14 AM, thanks robert moses said:

Don't get the intro. What did that have to do with the rest of the film?

 

That's how they created the human race

 

. :shrug:

 

?

Just watched the movie today with a group of friends. Very disappointed. Have never really been into horror movies and although some people don't consider the Alien franchise a non-horror, the characters in Prometheus just did really stupid shit.

 

It also just barely brushed on concepts like religion and what it means to be a human but ive seen these ideas gone much more in depth in better, more thoughtful, films. As a summer blockbuster-esque movie, it was pretty decent. Good effects and great acting by Micheal Fassbender makes me a bit more happy i saw it on the big screen.

So might as well chip in with my thoughts on this.

  Reveal hidden contents

Edited by compson

" Last law bearing means that any reformer or Prophet will be a subordinate of the Holy Prophet (saw) and no new Messenger and Prophet with a new religion, book or decree will come after him. Everything from him will be under the banner of Islam only."

Didn't mean to sound like I was telling Robbie to be better than Ridley Scott, or need 100 million dollars to be able to make a film. I was thinking purely. If the story or ideas are sound enough, a great film can be made for not that much money. Some of my favourite films were made on a limited budget, yours being some of them Mirezzi.

 

I hope to someday make a film that I can be proud of.

 

and the first scene?

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

  On 6/10/2012 at 12:33 PM, Atop said:

and the first scene?

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

  On 6/10/2012 at 12:40 PM, Squee said:
  On 6/10/2012 at 12:33 PM, Atop said:

and the first scene?

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

  On 6/10/2012 at 6:14 AM, thanks robert moses said:

Don't get the intro. What did that have to do with the rest of the film?

 

Yeah good question. Not sure if it is like a sacrafice to plant dna into an environment? Or something like that.

 

edit: sorry I just read the above spoilers, I think we are on the same wavelength with this.

Edited by beerwolf
  On 6/10/2012 at 12:51 PM, Atop said:
  On 6/10/2012 at 12:40 PM, Squee said:
  On 6/10/2012 at 12:33 PM, Atop said:

and the first scene?

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

  On 6/10/2012 at 1:05 PM, Squee said:
  On 6/10/2012 at 12:51 PM, Atop said:
  On 6/10/2012 at 12:40 PM, Squee said:
  On 6/10/2012 at 12:33 PM, Atop said:

and the first scene?

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Edited by compson

" Last law bearing means that any reformer or Prophet will be a subordinate of the Holy Prophet (saw) and no new Messenger and Prophet with a new religion, book or decree will come after him. Everything from him will be under the banner of Islam only."

tumblr_m5e8xiMZQ71rscaybo1_500.gif

" Last law bearing means that any reformer or Prophet will be a subordinate of the Holy Prophet (saw) and no new Messenger and Prophet with a new religion, book or decree will come after him. Everything from him will be under the banner of Islam only."

i really enjoyed the movie despite its nagging flaws,i think its a delibrately vague story which could go in numerous directions in inevitable sequels,and i think this was the plan all along,hence the marketing campaign and the fierce hollywood style editing of the actual movie which does cause problems but gives them the summer blockbuster the studio needed,also i think this film like ALIEN and BLADE RUNNER will get better with time,a lot of subtle details will eventually be discovered by repeat viewings which will alter future perceptions of the movie,therefore creating the new franchise/fan-base they desired all along

cool DNA gif compson!

Edited by sunshine recorder

Yeah great gif.

 

I have only seen the movie once in the theater so some details are gone now, but I do remember thinking the movie had a kind of eerie realism. When one character says 'big things have small beginnings', that's exactly how I felt this movie was. It wasn't a spectacle in an unrealistic sense. The planet was gray and empty and the effects and events were 'small'. Prometheus felt like this small beginning.

I also reacted to how much advertisement there was, because I was afraid it would just be a money cow, and in some ways I think it was, but I also think there were a lot of things with depth.

 

I have to give it repeat viewings to really straighten everything out in my head, but if I overlook some obvious scripting flaws I can view this in a very positive light.

Shaw gets pregnant with squid baby which turns out to be a proto-facehugger (which they made grow to a huge size, obviously for plot reasons. I think it would have worked better had they kept the squid/proto-facehugger small and nimble so at the end it's not all huge and thrashing about in the medical room, but rather she goes in there thinking it's way dead and then hears a skittering and something gets knocked over and you get a glimpse in the corner of your eye of a small creature scuttling about, then suddenly it's jumps out of nowhere and wraps itself around your head a lᠴraditional facehugger but with tentacles instead of legs. this still could have worked as a way to dispatch the engineer also, and impregnate him with the proto-alien).

 

but anyway, all facehuggers come from eggs laid by the queen alien, so in effect Shaw is taking the role of the queen in this instance - ie humans originally (if unknowingly) created the alien creature that subsequently terrorises everybody in the later films. a human woman was the first queen, the first incubator.

 

I was confused as to when the proto-alien comes out of the engineer at the end as to why it's fully-formed and not a chest-burster (or a proto-chestburster). these things start off small and shed their skin etc as they grow as far a I remember, not just pop out ready for action. also if the final alien that comes out of the engineer is the first incarnation of the creature that then spawns the things we know and love surely the proto-alien thing should have been a queen (with queeny elaborate head-shell etc). the thing that pops out of engineer dude just looks like a soldier/worker type alien which don't lay eggs etc and can't create life.

 

I dunno, too many holes.

Edited by BCM
  On 6/10/2012 at 2:15 PM, BCM said:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

Interesting theory, but the planet in Prometheus isn't LV-426

I don't know if we should still use spoiler tags for plot details, because the movie is out and if you walk into a thread called Prometheus you're bound to get something spoiled, but for safety reasons I've just added a couple of spoiler tags to the last couple of posts.

  Reveal hidden contents

Edited by coax
  On 6/10/2012 at 2:33 PM, coax said:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

" Last law bearing means that any reformer or Prophet will be a subordinate of the Holy Prophet (saw) and no new Messenger and Prophet with a new religion, book or decree will come after him. Everything from him will be under the banner of Islam only."

@osc:

 

not sure that really matters - lots of ways you could explain this. there are lots of other ships on LV-223, looked like there might be a couple more engineers too so alien could potentially have got off-world that way.

 

or it could be as simple as they renamed LV-223 to LV-426 for whatever reason (probably something to do with all the shit that happened and covering it up).

 

or LV-426 could be where Shaw and David end up at when they head-off at the end.

 

Or it could be LV-426 is another installation like LV-223 where the same thing happened and there are already aliens on it in the same timeframe we just haven't encountered them yet...

 

I dunno, loads of possibilities, like I say don't think it's actually that important about the LV-223/LV-426 discrepancy.

Edited by BCM
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×