pics you took that you're pleased with

  On 1/18/2016 at 2:12 AM, oscillik said:

got myself an Instax printer. I'm so fucking hipster right now

 

Your pictures are getting better and better nice progression

  On 1/19/2016 at 9:51 PM, o00o said:

 

  On 1/18/2016 at 2:12 AM, oscillik said:

got myself an Instax printer. I'm so fucking hipster right now

 

Your pictures are getting better and better nice progression

 

thanks man! Here's the source pic, so it's not so hipsterfied

 

Brutal Staircase

i like that better, lovely. album cover material.

I went to the Japans a while ago. Soz for big post/multiple editz.

 

sumida river 3 by iteritinerant, on Flickr

 

Nara 2 by iteritinerant, on Flickr

 

Inari 1 by iteritinerant, on Flickr

 

Arashiayama 15 by iteritinerant, on Flickr

 

Arashiayama 13 by iteritinerant, on Flickr

 

bonus deer buttz:

 

Nara 5 by iteritinerant, on Flickr

Edited January 20, 2016 by baph

^^^ I like that one, angles and textures be so crisp.

 

-

Went out to shoot some pics in the tiny amount of time I had off this week with a friend.

 

IMGP1889 by polygon window, on Flickr

 

IMGP1895 by polygon window, on Flickr

 

IMGP1901 by polygon window, on Flickr

 

IMGP1905 by polygon window, on Flickr

 

IMGP1910 by polygon window, on Flickr

 

IMGP1945 by polygon window, on Flickr

 

IMGP1977 by polygon window, on Flickr

 

IMGP1984 by polygon window, on Flickr

 

IMGP1988 by polygon window, on Flickr

 

 

Very nice pictures man. I think we might get the same camera you got, it's time for an upgrade.

Jaysus, every post in this thread is top class. Direct correlation between teh IDUMZ and visual aesthetics.

FALL UP

IMGP2031 by polygon window, on Flickr

 

IMGP1146 by polygon window, on Flickr

 

IMGP1117 by polygon window, on Flickr

made this at a chemical printing workshop thing today in Liverpool. Really awesome, playing about with film developing chemicals on photosensitive paper

 

Chemical Printing by oscillik

love the hummingbird pics audio, sp. the first one

humble little collage of cell phone pics all taken on same day.

 

texture on that bark is very cool

I just bought an XF23mm 1.4 R lens, and I've pre-ordered the X-Pro2.

 

Exait.

 

In the meantime, here are the last few pics I took with my X100T a few days ago. That camera has now been traded in.

 

DSCF2858-2 by oscillik, on Flickr

 

DSCF2859-3 by oscillik, on Flickr

 

DSCF2862-4 by oscillik, on Flickr

Edited February 6, 2016 by oscillik

  On 1/24/2016 at 9:52 PM, Danny O Flannagin said:

Nice pic man, it looks like a tv sitting atop an odd concreted landscape in the late afternoon light, the windows are almost like pools of water.

 

Also, that staircase pic is alright osci, nicely done. I'm over interestingly framed bleak city architecture scapes an age ago, but the stair case is very good.

I recently upgraded to a smartphone so now I'm in that instagram game.

 

 

  On 1/24/2016 at 9:52 PM, Danny O Flannagin said:

 

[picture]

 

A truly outstanding job, Danny.

 

///

 

Anyone here who prefer not using filters/post-process at all (or knows about anyone really good)? Would love to see some outstanding dry pictures.

Gonna break the rules for a moment and post a pic I saw in the latest issue of NatGeo

 

 

A Man Feeding Swans in the Snow by Marcin Ryczek

EDIT : I love the above pic ^^^

 

Good lord that is an old stove, Braintree.

 

@ Jev -- I prefer not to post-process and shoot raw for the most part. I don't even own photoshop or the like. I'm sure most of my photos could look all crazy with more processing, but I can't be arsed to do it for too long if any as long as the pic is quality and was what I was going for when taking the pic.

Edited February 7, 2016 by Audioblysk

  On 2/7/2016 at 12:22 AM, ThatSpanishGuy said:

 

A Man Feeding Swans in the Snow by Marcin Ryczek

 

I would love to see it in big format on a wall.

 

 

  On 2/7/2016 at 12:29 AM, Audioblysk said:

EDIT : I love the above pic ^^^

 

Good lord that is an old stove, Braintree.

 

@ Jev -- I prefer not to post-process and shoot raw for the most part. I don't even own photoshop or the like. I'm sure most of my photos could look all crazy with more processing, but I can't be arsed to do it for too long if any as long as the pic is quality and was what I was going for when taking the pic.

 

Got a link to a collection of your stuff?

  On 2/7/2016 at 12:18 AM, Jev said:

 

 

Anyone here who prefer not using filters/post-process at all (or knows about anyone really good)? Would love to see some outstanding dry pictures.

 

but....all digital photos are processed by the JPEG converters inside them (if you're shooting in JPEG mode, if in RAW mode then they're not processed) and thusly are 'filtered' through whatever colour curves they have.

 

but hey-ho

Lovely played osc but you know what I meant :-*

 

I will clarify my question.

 

Anyone here or on the internet (you know about) with a fairly neutral camera and with no filters/post-process?

 

Don't get me wrong, I enjoy good processed pictures. I am just curious.

I shoot in raw but that requires tweaking in Lightroom, if nothing other than to provide enough sharpening to make the image not look like poo on a screen.

 

I usually tweak by Lightroom fader beyond that, though. Control over processing is the only reason to shoot raw over jpeg.

 

But I don't think osc was just being facetious; it's really hard to know where to draw the "purity" line in photography.

 

I've uploaded stuff straight from my camera, and did that a lot more before I got a steep discount on Lightroom a few years back, but looking back the tweaked stuff is probably closer to what "I saw," if that's a basic requirement for naturalistic photos.

 

Tl;dr is basically "I unno." Probably the easiest way to see something like what you want is to set some narrow official parameters and get submissions? Because basic exposure and sharpening and white balance points etc are maybe necessary if you're not shooting jpeg?

Edited February 7, 2016 by baph