Here Is What Happens When You Cast Lindsay Lohan in Your Movie

you and me both bro

oh don't mistake my sentiments. i just want a working environment where I can be naked all the time.

  On 1/11/2013 at 6:21 PM, lumpenprol said:

she will die this year, mark my words

Marked!

This looks like a good movie where the subtext is more interesting than the movie itself.

Good trailer, which means exactly nothing about whether the movie will be shit or great

the trailer is trying to make her look sexy, if your idea of sexy is a girl who looks like she's been punched in the face 20 times really hard and then covered it up with concealer.

is the fact that James Dean is the most popular new male porn star right similar to how Justin Bieber is the most popular new male musician?

Not in my opinion. Deen is a pretty passionate dom, and despite not seeming very articulate, he writes like a kind and humble person. I think he actually gives porn stars a pretty good name. Also, I was intrigued by his facial expression in the trailer, for whatever that's worth.

*Impresses the shit out of A/D with facial expressions*

i like POV, so if i've ever watched anything that dean was in, i wouldn't know it.

;-p; yeah, it's like dat..

*feverishly awaits gordo's next artistic endeavor*

So the production company has posted pretty much every nude shot and scene Lindsay does in this movie online. They know what people wanna see.

watched it last night. it was like a reverse hallmark channel movie.

script was a pretty low quality but i think this is a real positive showcase for james deen who really does a believable psychopath. he has a magically natural body language and when his lines weren't sucky he gave some excellent delivery

lindsay lohan looked constipated and sticky and isn't totally wasted on the film

I don't know how people put up with this kind of shit. Making a film is hard enough already without people acting up and being unprofessional. I'd never cast her.

  On 1/16/2013 at 8:17 AM, ghOsty said:

I agree lumpy, It's been a while but I remember reading through that AMA, the one thing that struck me is that despite being dubbed as "sensitive" and "professional", that there seems to be this very strong sense of detachment from him. I don't remember the exact quote but somewhere in there he said something along the lines of "whoever I'm doing a scene with during those hours we're shooting they are the love of my life"... But even that just seemed like I guy who was just overly used to "going through the motions." The other answers just gave of this cold vibe of detachment and lonliness. Perhaps a little Bateman is exactly what it is, whatever it is I'm sure the guy has quite a few inner demons.

Well, all pornstars have issues. They give up the possibility of real personal relationships and if they decide to leave the business they're met with derision pretty much anywhere they go. Unless you're James Deen or something.

the description of the article makes lohan out to be a real idiot, i guess that must be the new cool these days though.

It's called addiction, she's just completed 3 months of lockdown rehab, will continue intensive court-ordered therapy for at least the next 15 months, and besides, practically everyone involved in the production has gone on the record saying they would work with her again in a heartbeat and that it wasn't nearly as bad as that article made it seem. I guess the positive stories just don't get that kind of exposure.

  On 8/3/2013 at 7:04 AM, Rubin Farr said:

They know what people wanna see.

lol

i was in the lane at the grocery some years back when lohan and jared leto came twisting through acting like complete twits. she's a nice girl though

i just watched the first 30 minutes of this movie and had to stop.

the acting is terrible. the script is terrible. the set looked great though. the colour effect looked great also... kinda like the exact opposite of a malick film in that way (very dull).

it actually seemed like lohan was doing a decentish job of the shit lines but I couldn't do it anymore.

i still hope for little lindsay lohan in my thumping heart parts. i can't help but think she'll come out the other side of all this with a massively good performance in something and ride her wave of endless, worldwide media publicity safely into shore. she was decent in one or two films. 'bobby' was bearable, she was actually fairly well behaved in that

oop, my goodness, would u look at that http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2361317/

His wife should be worried, he might get kooties from kissing lohan.

Currently watching it 30mins in and can't help but wondering about all the different layers. Sure the acting is awkward. The dialogues as well. The characters and the story likewise. But somehow, it's all too orchestrated. Like the article in the topic starter is part of the concept. The leaked nudes from the movie. And the movie itself has obviously leaked as well. It's all part of the concept: the scam of Hollywood.

So the question is: is this the Bret Easton Ellis behind the wheel?

This is either incredibly stupid, or insanely brilliant.

It's better watching it the second time, btw.

And it helps watching it like a David Lynch movie. Like a Mullholland Drive perhaps?

Don't get me wrong I wish her all the very best, but just because you're an "artist" doesn't mean you can act like a Dickhead. Hopefully she's sober now and will go on to make the most of her talent.

  On 1/12/2013 at 12:47 AM, Deer said:

That part when the bottle almost felt to the floor but she grabbed it mid-air, wosh! i thought i was watching spider-wowan there for a second.

Best bottle-falling-off-shelf-catch scene in any film ever

let's hope her recent stint in rehab causes her to pull a Cory Monteith

  On 8/4/2013 at 4:04 PM, lumpenprol said:

let's hope her recent stint in rehab causes her to pull a Cory Monteith

let's not